TP53 outperforms other androgen receptor biomarkers to predict abiraterone or enzalutamide outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Purpose: To infer the prognostic value of simultaneous androgen receptor (AR) and TP53 profiling in liquid biopsies from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) starting a new line of AR signaling inhibitors (ARSi). Experimental Design: Between March 2014 and April 2017, we recruited patients with mCRPC (n = 168) prior to ARSi in a cohort study encompassing 10 European centers. Blood samples were collected for comprehensive profiling of Cell Search-enriched circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Targeted CTC RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) allowed the detection of eight AR splice variants (ARV). Low-pass whole-genome and targeted gene-body sequencing of AR and TP53 was applied to identify amplifications, loss of heterozygosity, mutations, and structural rearrangements in ctDNA. Clinical or radiologic progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and independent associations were determined using multivariable Cox regression models. Results: Overall, no single AR perturbation remained associated with adverse prognosis after multivariable analysis. Instead, tumor burden estimates (CTC counts, ctDNA fraction, and visceral metastases) were significantly associated with PFS. TP53 inactivation harbored independent prognostic value [HR 1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-3.00; P = 0.008], and outperformed ARV expression and detection of genomic AR alterations. Using Cox coefficient analysis of clinical parameters and TP53 status, we identified three prognostic groups with differing PFS estimates (median, 14.7 vs. 7.51 vs. 2.62 months; P < 0.0001), which was validated in an independent mCRPC cohort (n = 202) starting first-line ARSi (median, 14.3 vs. 6.39 vs. 2.23 months; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: In an all-comer cohort, tumor burden estimates and TP53 outperform any AR perturbation to infer prognosis. See related commentary by Rebello et al., p. 169

Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.BACKGROUND: There are multiple existing and emerging therapeutic avenues for metastatic prostate cancer, with a common denominator, which is the need for predictive biomarkers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to cost-efficiently accelerate precision medicine trials to improve clinical efficacy and diminish costs and toxicity. However, comprehensive ctDNA profiling in metastatic prostate cancer to date has been limited. METHODS: A combination of targeted and low-pass whole genome sequencing was performed on plasma cell-free DNA and matched white blood cell germline DNA in 364 blood samples from 217 metastatic prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: ctDNA was detected in 85.9% of baseline samples, correlated to line of therapy and was mirrored by circulating tumor cell enumeration of synchronous blood samples. Comprehensive profiling of the androgen receptor (AR) revealed a continuous increase in the fraction of patients with intra-AR structural variation, from 15.4% during first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy to 45.2% in fourth line, indicating a continuous evolution of AR during the course of the disease. Patients displayed frequent alterations in DNA repair deficiency genes (18.0%). Additionally, the microsatellite instability phenotype was identified in 3.81% of eligible samples (≥ 0.1 ctDNA fraction). Sequencing of non-repetitive intronic and exonic regions of PTEN, RB1, and TP53 detected biallelic inactivation in 47.5%, 20.3%, and 44.1% of samples with ≥ 0.2 ctDNA fraction, respectively. Only one patient carried a clonal high-impact variant without a detectable second hit. Intronic high-impact structural variation was twice as common as exonic mutations in PTEN and RB1. Finally, 14.6% of patients presented false positive variants due to clonal hematopoiesis, commonly ignored in commercially available assays. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA profiles appear to mirror the genomic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer tissue and may cost-efficiently provide somatic information in clinical trials designed to identify predictive biomarkers. However, intronic sequencing of the interrogated tumor suppressors challenges the ubiquitous focus on coding regions and is vital, together with profiling of synchronous white blood cells, to minimize erroneous assignments which in turn may confound results and impede true associations in clinical trials.The Belgian Foundation Against Cancer (grant number C/2014/227); Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer), the Flemish Cancer Society (grant number 00000000116000000206); Royal College of Surgeons/Cancer Research UK (C19198/A1533); The Cancer Research Funds of Radiumhemmet, through the PCM program at KI (grant number 163012); The Erling-Persson family foundation (grant number 4-2689-2016); the Swedish Research Council (grant number K2010-70X-20430-04-3), and the Swedish Cancer Foundation (grant number 09-0677)

Genetic testing in prostate cancer in clinical practice

Mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are relatively common in prostate cancer (PC), and may guide therapy selection. Approximately half of somatic DDR mutations are also present in the germline and lead to a heritable cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS), which informs on future risk, prostate cancer prognosis, and therapeutic options. In germline carriers, genetic counselling is essential to help psychosocial coping and to provide pre-symptomatic testing in relatives, who upon carrier identification can opt for intensified surveillance or – in some cases – prophylactic surgery

Evaluation and consequences of heterogeneity in the circulating tumor cell compartment

A growing understanding of the molecular biology of cancer and the identification of specific aberrations driving cancer evolution have led to the development of various targeted agents. Therapeutic decisions concerning these drugs are often guided by single biopsies of the primary tumor. Yet, it is well known that tumors can exhibit significant heterogeneity and change over time as a result of selective pressure. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are shed from various tumor sites and are thought to represent the molecular landscape of a patient's overall tumor burden. Moreover, a minimal-invasive liquid biopsy facilitates monitoring of clonal evolution during therapy pressure and disease progression in real-time. While more information becomes available regarding heterogeneity among CTCs, comparison between these studies is needed. In this review, we focus on the genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity found in the CTC compartment, and its significance for clinical decision making.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Using, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for therapy response assessment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an application of EAU/EANM recommendations in clinical practice.

peer reviewedFor patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), no reliable biomarkers are currently available that predict therapeutic response or assist in treatment selection and sequencing. Using the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EAU/EANM) recommendations, we aimed to (1) compare response assessment between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) and conventional imaging (CI) in mCRPC patients starting a first-line treatment with novel hormonal agents (NHA), and (2) perform a sequential comparative analysis of PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. Methods: Eighteen mCRPC patients who started NHA and underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before therapy initiation (baseline), at week 4 (W4) and week 12 (W12), in addition to CI (bone scintigraphy, CT) at baseline and W12, were retrospectively included. PET/CT images were quantitatively analyzed for maximum and mean standardized uptake value and total PSMA-ligand positive total lesion (PSMA-TL). Comparative analysis of PET/CT-derived parameters was performed, and patients were classified with non-progressive disease (non-PD) or progressive disease (PD) according to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, PSA and CI criteria. Results: Treatment response was evaluable by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 16/18 (89%) patients compared to 11/18 (61%) by CI. At W12, patients with PD by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT already met progression criteria at W4 (n = 5/16) and substantial agreement was observed between the W4 and W12 (κ = 0.74) 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Nonetheless, 2/16 (13%) patients were wrongly classified with PD due to a flare phenomenon on PSMA PET/CT, which disappeared at W12. Conclusion: Volumetric assessments of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging can improve response evaluation in NHA-treated patients with mCRPC. Although early response assessments at W4 need to be approached with caution due to flare, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging at 4 and 12 weeks revealed a substantial agreement in the therapy response assessment, which warrants further investigation to distinguish PD from flare at W4 and help improve our understanding of resistance to therapy

Automated enumeration and phenotypic characterization of CTCs and tdEVs in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) initially benefit from treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi), resistance inevitably occurs. Hence, we investigated the prognostic value of automated circulating tumor cell (CTC) and tumor-derived extracellular vesicle (tdEV) enumeration and their dynamics, in patients with mCRPC in the context of the initiation of treatment with ARSi. Furthermore, we hypothesize that CTC phenotypic heterogeneity might serve as a measurable biomarker under these circumstances. METHODS: Using an image analysis tool, we reanalyzed all CellSearch images previously acquired in the context of a prospective, multicenter clinical study for patients with mCRPC (n = 170) starting a new line of ARSi, for CTC and tdEV detection and enumeration. CTC (n = 19 129) phenotypic diversity was quantified by the Shannon index (SI). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups of patients stratified according to CTC, tdEV, and SI levels. RESULTS: Automated CTC enumeration provided similar clinical prognostication compared with operator-based counts. Patients demonstrating high CTC phenotypic heterogeneity before therapy had a shorter median PFS (4.82 vs. 8.49 months, HR 1.79; P = 0.03) and OS (12.6 months vs. not reached, HR 2.32; P = 0.03), compared to patients with low diversity, irrespective of CTC level. Multivariable analysis showed how the prognostic value of the baseline SI was lost by pretreatment chemotherapy status, CTC counts, and PSA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Automated CTC counts are a reliable substitute for reviewer-based enumeration, as they are equally informative for prognosis assessment in patients with mCRPC. Beyond enumeration, we demonstrated the added value of studying CTC phenotypic diversity for patient prognostication, warranting future investigation