Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic management of splenic artery aneurysms: a 10-year study

Abstract BACKGROUND: The literature does not support the choice between open and laparoscopic management of splenic artery aneurysms (SAA). METHODS: We designed a prospective, randomized comparison between open and laparoscopic surgery for SAA. Primary end points were types of surgical procedures performed and clinical outcomes. Analysis was developed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were allocated to laparotomy (group A) and 15 to laparoscopy (group B). Groups displayed similar patient- and aneurysm-related characteristics. The conversion rate to open surgery was 13.3 %. The type of surgical procedure performed on the splenic artery was similar in the two groups: aneurysmectomy with splenic artery ligature or direct anastomosis was performed in 51 % and 21 % of patients in group A and in 60 % and 20 % in group B, respectively. The splenectomy rate was similar (14 % vs. 20 %). Postoperative splenic infarction was observed in one case in each group. Laparoscopy was associated with shorter procedures (p = 0.0003) and lower morbidity (25 % vs. 64 %, p = 0.045). Major morbidity requiring interventional procedures and blood transfusion was observed only in group A. Laparoscopy was associated with quicker resumption of oral diet (p < 0.001), earlier drain removal (p = 0.046), and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01). During a mean follow-up of 50 months, two patients in group A required hospital readmission. In group B, two patients developed a late thrombosis of arterial anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that laparoscopy permits multiple technical options, does not increase the splenectomy rate, and reduces postoperative complications. It confirms the supposed clinical benefits of laparoscopy when ablative procedures are required but laparoscopic anastomoses show poor long-term results

Conversion of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Results in Restoration of the Positive Effect on Weight Loss and Co-morbidities: Evaluation of 101 Patients

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a widely used restrictive procedure in bariatric surgery. However, the re-operation rate after this operation is high. In the case of VBG failure, a conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is an option. A study was undertaken to evaluate the results of the conversion from VBG to RYGBP. METHODS: 101 patients had conversion from VBG to RYGBP. Patients were separated into 3 groups, based on the indication for conversion: weight regain (group 1), excessive weight loss (group 2) and severe eating difficulties (group 3). Data for the study were collected by retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data. RESULTS: Weight regain (group 1) was the reason for conversion in 73.3% of patients. Staple-line disruption was the most important cause for the weight regain (74.3%). Excessive weight loss (group 2) affected 14% of patients and was caused by outlet stenosis in 78.6% of patients. The remaining 13% had severe eating difficulties as a result of outlet stenosis (46.1%), pouch dilatation (30.8%) and pouch diverticula (23.1%). Mean BMI before conversion to RYGBP was 40.5, 22.3 and 29.8 kg/m2 in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Minor or major direct postoperative complications were observed in 2.0% to 7.0%. Long-term complications were more frequent, and consisted mainly of anastomotic stenosis (22.7%) and incisional hernia (16.8%). Follow-up after conversion was achieved in all patients (100%), with a mean period of 38 +/- 29 months. BMI decreased from 40.5 to 30.1 kg/m2, increased from 22.3 to 25.3 kg/m2. and decreased slightly from 29.8 to 29.0 kg/m2 in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. All patients in group 3 noticed an improvement in eating difficulties. CONCLUSION: Complications after conversion from failed VBG to RYGBP are substantial and need to be considered. However, the conversion itself is a successful operation in terms of effect on body weight and treating eating difficulties after VBG

A biodegradeable membrane from porcine intestinal submucosa to reinforce the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Preliminary report

Background: A Silastic ring has been used to prevent dilation of the gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), The use of a bio-membrane may prevent dilation of the anastomosis without the risks associated with prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of applying such a bio-membrane around the gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic RYGBP (LRYGBP).Methods: We used a new bio-membrane, that is derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and acts as a scaffolding for the ingrowth of connective tissue. Over a 4-month period, 14 LRYGBP patients had their proximal anastomosis wrapped with 10 x 2.5 cm SIS by a single surgeon. We compared these patients to a control group of LRYGBP patients matched for BMI.Results: The average age of the patients was 35.0 years (control group: 45.1 years),The patients had a mean initial BMI of 44.7 kg/m(2) (+/-5.9) standard error, and the control subjects had a mean initial BMI of 46.7 kg/m(2) (+/-6.5). SIS application took a mean time of 11 (+/-3) minutes without any intraoperative complication. The median hospital stay was 3.5 days in the experimental group and 3.7 days in controls. Three patients developed a symptomatic stenosis at the gastrojejunostomy following surgery. In the control group there were two stenoses, At an average followup of 87 days (controls: 95 days), the mean reduction in BMI was 7.8 (+/-0.8) kg/m(2) [controls 8.6 kg/m(2) (+/-1.5)].Conclusion: Application of SIS around the gastrojejunostomy in patients undergoing LRYGBP is feasible and safe. Further follow-up is required, however, to evaluate the effectiveness in preventing dilation of the anastomosis

Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: Experience from 27 consecutive patients

Background: 10 to 25% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery will require a revision, either for unsatisfactory weight loss or for complications. Reoperation is associated with a higher morbidity and has traditionally been done in open fashion. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of reoperative surgery using a laparoscopic approach.Methods: A retrospective review of medical records over a 22-month period was conducted. 27 consecutive obesity surgery patients, who had undergone a laparoscopic revision, were identified. 26 of the 27 patients were women. The average age was 40.3 years (range 20 to 58 years) and average original preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 51.6 kg/m(2) (range 42 to 66.5). The 27 primary bariatric operations consisted of vertical banded gastroplasty (12), gastric band placement (9) and gastric bypass (6). 17 of them were open procedures. After the primary surgery, the lowest average BMI was 37.6 kg/m(2) (range 21 to 52), which increased to 42.7 kg/m(2) (range 29 to 56) before reoperation. 24 of the 27 reoperations were indicated for insufficient weight loss. On average, revision was undertaken 52 months after the primary procedure (range 12 to 240 months).Results: 24 of the 27 laparoscopic reoperations were conversions to a gastric bypass. A second reoperation was indicated for insufficient weight loss on four occasions. In one case, conversion to open surgery was required. The average operative time was 232 +/- 18.5 minutes (range 120 to 480) and length of hospital stay was 3.7 days (range 1 to 9). 22% percent of patients (6) experienced complications, including pneumothorax, gastric remnant dilation, gastrojejunostomy stenosis, port-site hernia and protein malnutrition. There was no mortality in the study. The average BMI was 35.9 kg/m(2) (range 27 to 45.5) 8 months after surgery (range 1 to 22 months). Compared with a preoperative BMI of 42.7 kg/m(2), the weight loss was statistically significant (p&lt;0.001).Conclusion: Our results compare favorably with those reported for open reoperative bariatric surgery. A laparoscopic approach may be considered a feasible and safe alternative to an open operation