6 research outputs found
What are the risk factors of failure of enhanced recovery after right colectomy? Results of a prospective study on 140 consecutive cases
Purpose Nausea and vomiting is the main cause of failure of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) after right hemicolectomy. Methods From January 2013 to January 2018, all patients undergoing right hemicolectomy were prospectively included. Patients undergoing emergency surgery, additional complex procedure or temporary stoma, nasogastric tube (NGT) maintenance, or abdominal drainage were excluded. Failure of ERP was defined as nausea/vomiting precluding oral feeding after POD3 and/or the occurrence of postoperative ileus requiring NGT and/or length of stay (LOS) ≥ 8 days except for patients awaiting admission in rehabilitation unit. Risk factors of failure of ERP were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results Among 306 patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, 140 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Postoperative morbidity was 31%, and the mortality rate was nil. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 2–30). Successful ERP was achieved in 83 patients (59%). Causes of failure were major nausea/vomiting precluding oral feeding after POD3 in 36, postoperative ileus requiring NGT in 16 and LOS ≥ 8 days in 36. On multivariate analysis, preoperative anemia (OR 5.2; CI 95%, 1.3–21.1, p = 0.02) and platelet anti-aggregant/anti-coagulant (OR 4.5; CI 95%, 1.7–12.1, p = 0.003) were associated with the risk of failure of ERP. Conclusion This study shows that anemia and medication with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy increase the risk of failure of ERP after right hemicolectomy that translates most of the time by nausea/vomiting and postoperative ileus. The presence of these factors should lead to adapt the strategy to improve outcome rather than be considered as contraindication to ERP
Surgical management of insulinoma over three decades
International audienceBackgroundThis paper reports our experience of the perioperative management of patients with sporadic, non-malignant, pancreatic insulinoma.MethodsA retrospective monocentric cohort study was performed from January 1989 to July 2019, including all the patients who had been operated on for pancreatic insulinoma. The preoperative work-up, surgical management, and postoperative outcome were analyzed.ResultsEighty patients underwent surgery for sporadic pancreatic insulinoma, 50 of which were female (62%), with a median age of 50 (36–70) years. Preoperatively, the tumors were localized in 76 patients (95%). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging allowed exact preoperative tumor localization in 76% of the patients (64–85 and 58–88 patients, respectively), increasing to 96% when endoscopic ultrasonography was performed. Forty-one parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies (PSP) (including enucleation, caudal pancreatectomy, and uncinate process resection) and 39 pancreatic resections were performed. The mortality rate was 6% (n = 5), with a morbidity rate of 72%, including 24 severe complications (30%) and 35 pancreatic fistulas (44%). No differences were found between formal pancreatectomy and PSP in terms of postoperative outcome procedures. The surgery was curative in all the patients.ConclusionCT used in combination with endoscopic ultrasonography allows accurate localization of insulinomas in almost all patients. When possible, a parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy should be proposed as the first-line surgical strategy