Task‐specific strength increases after lower‐limb compound resistance training occurred in the absence of corticospinal changes in vastus lateralis

Neural adaptations subserving strength increases have been shown to be task‐specific, but responses and adaptation to lower‐limb compound exercises such as the squat are commonly assessed in a single‐limb isometric task. This two‐part study assessed neuromuscular responses to an acute bout (Study A) and 4 weeks (Study B) of squat resistance training at 80% of one‐repetition‐maximum, with measures taken during a task‐specific isometric squat (IS) and non‐specific isometric knee extension (KE). Eighteen healthy volunteers (25 ± 5 years) were randomised into either a training (n = 10) or a control (n = 8) group. Neural responses were evoked at the intracortical, corticospinal and spinal levels, and muscle thickness was assessed using ultrasound. The results of Study A showed that the acute bout of squat resistance training decreased maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) for up to 45 min post‐exercise (−23%, P < 0.001). From 15–45 min post‐exercise, spinally evoked responses were increased in both tasks (P = 0.008); however, no other evoked responses were affected (P ≥ 0.240). Study B demonstrated that following short‐term resistance training, participants improved their one repetition maximum squat (+35%, P < 0.001), which was reflected by a task‐specific increase in IS MVC (+49%, P = 0.001), but not KE (+1%, P = 0.882). However, no training‐induced changes were observed in muscle thickness (P = 0.468) or any evoked responses (P = 0.141). Adjustments in spinal motoneuronal excitability are evident after acute resistance training. After a period of short‐term training, there were no changes in the responses to central nervous system stimulation, which suggests that alterations in corticospinal properties of the vastus lateralis might not contribute to increases in strength

Cross-education of wrist extensor strength is not influenced by non-dominant training in right-handers

Purpose Cross-education of strength has been proposed to be greater when completed by the dominant limb in right handed humans. We investigated whether the direction of cross-education of strength and corticospinal plasticity are different following right or left limb strength training in right-handed participants. Methods Changes in strength, muscle thickness and indices of corticospinal plasticity were analyzed in 23 adults who were exposed to 3-weeks of either right-hand strength training (RHT) or left-hand strength training (LHT). Results Maximum voluntary wrist extensor strength in both the trained and untrained limb increased, irrespective of which limb was trained, with TMS revealing reduced corticospinal inhibition. Conclusions Cross-education of strength was not limited by which limb was trained and reduced corticospinal inhibition was not just confined to the trained limb. Critically, from a behavioral perspective, the magnitude of cross-education was not limited by which limb was trained

Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training

Synaptic plasticity in the motor cortex (M1) is associated with strength training and can be modified by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The M1 responses to strength training increase when anodal-tDCS is applied during training due to gating. An additional approach to improve the M1 responses to strength training, which has not been explored, is to use anodal-tDCS to prime the M1 before a bout of strength training. We examined the priming effects of anodal-tDCS of M1 on the acute corticospinal responses to strength training. In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, changes in isometric strength, corticospinal-excitability and inhibition (assessed as area under the recruitment curve [AURC] using transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]) were analysed in 13 adults exposed to 20-min of anodal and sham-tDCS followed by a strength training session of the right elbow-flexors. We observed a significant decrease in isometric elbow-flexor strength immediately following training (11-12%; P < 0.05) which was not different between anodal-tDCS and sham-tDCS. TMS revealed a 24% increase in AURC for corticospinal-excitability following anodal-tDCS and strength training; this increase was not different between conditions. However, there was a 14% reduction in AURC for corticospinal inhibition when anodal-tDCS was applied prior to strength training when compared to sham-tDCS and strength training (all P < 0.05). Priming anodal-tDCS had a limited effect in facilitating corticospinal-excitability following an acute bout of strength training. nterestingly, the interaction of anodal-tDCS and strength training appears to affect the excitability of intracortical inhibitory circuits of the M1 via non-homeostatic mechanisms

Adaptations in corticospinal excitability and inhibition are not spatially confined to the agonist muscle following strength training

Purpose: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to determine the corticospinal responses from an agonist and synergist muscle following strength training of the right elbow flexors. Methods: Motor evoked potentials were recorded from the Biceps Brachii and Flexor Carpi Radialis during a submaximal contraction from 20 individuals (10 women, 10 men, aged 18-35 years; training group; n = 10 and control group; n = 10) before and after three weeks of strength training at 80% of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM). To characterise the input-output properties of the corticospinal tract, stimulus-response curves for corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the right Biceps Brachii and Flexor Carpi Radialis were constructed and assessed by examining the area under the recruitment curve (AURC). Results: Strength training resulted in a 29% (P < 0.001) increase in 1-RM Biceps Brachii strength and this was accompanied by a 19% increase in isometric strength of the wrist flexors (P = 0.001). TMS revealed an increase in corticospinal excitability AURC and a decrease in silent period duration AURC for the Biceps Brachii and Flexor Carpi Radialis following strength training (all P < 0.05). However, the changes in corticospinal function were not associated with increased muscle strength. Conclusion: These findings show that the corticospinal responses to strength training of a proximal upper limb muscle is not spatially restricted, but rather, results in a change in connectivity, among an agonist and a synergistic muscle relevant to force production

Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Optimal strategies for enhancing strength and improving motor skills are vital in athletic performance and clinical rehabilitation. Initial increases in strength and the acquisition of new motor skills have long been attributed to neurological adaptations. However, early increases in strength may be predominantly due to improvements in inter-muscular coordination rather than the force-generating capacity of the muscle. Despite the plethora of research investigating neurological adaptations from motor skill or resistance training in isolation, little effort has been made in consolidating this research to compare motor skill and resistance training adaptations. The findings of this review demonstrated that motor skill and resistance training adaptations show similar short-term mechanisms of adaptations, particularly at a cortical level. Increases in corticospinal excitability and a release in short-interval cortical inhibition occur as a result of the commencement of both resistance and motor skill training. Spinal changes show evidence of task-specific adaptations from the acquired motor skill, with an increase or decrease in spinal reflex excitability, dependant on the motor task. An increase in synaptic efficacy of the reticulospinal projections is likely to be a prominent mechanism for driving strength adaptations at the subcortical level, though more research is needed. Transcranial electric stimulation has been shown to increase corticospinal excitability and augment motor skill adaptations, but limited evidence exists for further enhancing strength adaptations from resistance training. Despite the logistical challenges, future work should compare the longitudinal adaptations between motor skill and resistance training to further optimise exercise programming

Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training

Purpose The motor cortex (M1) appears to be a primary site of adaptation following both a single session, and repeated strength-training sessions across multiple weeks. Given that a single session of strength-training is sufficient to induce modification at the level of the M1 and corticospinal tract, this study sought to determine how these acute changes in M1 and corticospinal tract might accumulate across the course of a 2-week heavy-load strength-training program. Methods Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to infer corticospinal excitability (CSE), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) and silent period duration prior to and following each training session during a 2-week heavy-load strength-training period. Results Following 2-weeks of strength-training, increases in strength (15.5%, P = 0.01) were accompanied by an increase in CSE (44%, P = 0.006) and reductions in both silent period duration (14%, P < 0.0001) and SICI (35%, P = 0.0004). Early training sessions acutely increased CSE and ICF, and acutely reduced silent period duration and SICI. However, later training sessions failed to modulate SICI and ICF, with substantial adaptations occurring offline between training sessions. No acute or retained changes in LICI were observed. Co-contraction of antagonists reduced by 36% following 2-weeks of strength-training. Conclusions Collectively, these results indicate that corticospinal plasticity occurs within and between training sessions throughout a training period in distinct early and later stages that are modulated by separate mechanisms of plasticity. The development of strength is akin to the previously reported changes that occur following motor skill training

Determining the Sites of Neural Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Resistance-training causes changes in the central nervous system (CNS); however, the sites of these adaptations remain unclear. Objective: To determine sites of neural adaptation to resistance-training by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis on the cortical and subcortical responses to resistance-training. Methods: Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on neural adaptations to resistance-training was pooled to assess effect estimates for changes in strength, cortical, and subcortical adaptations. Results: The magnitude of strength gain in 30 RCTs (n = 623) reported a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.41, 0.94; P < 0.001) that measured at least one cortical/subcortical neural adaptation which included: motor-evoked potentials (MEP; 19 studies); silent period (SP; 7 studies); short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI; 7 studies); cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEP; 1 study); transcranial magnetic stimulation voluntary activation (VATMS; 2 studies); H-reflex (10 studies); and V-wave amplitudes (5 studies). The MEP amplitude during voluntary contraction was greater following resistance-training (SMD 0.55; 95% CI 0.27, 0.84; P < 0.001, n = 271), but remained unchanged during rest (SMD 0.49; 95% CI -0.68, 1.66; P = 0.41, n = 114). Both SP (SMD 0.65; 95% CI 0.29, 1.01; P < 0.001, n = 184) and active SICI (SMD 0.68; 95% CI 0.14, 1.23; P = 0.01, n = 102) decreased, but resting SICI remained unchanged (SMD 0.26; 95% CI − 0.29, 0.81; P = 0.35, n = 52). Resistance-training improved neural drive as measured by V-wave amplitude (SMD 0.62; 95% CI 0.14, 1.10; P = 0.01, n = 101), but H-reflex at rest (SMD 0.16; 95% CI − 0.36, 0.68; P = 0.56; n = 57), during contraction (SMD 0.15; 95% CI − 0.18, 0.48; P = 0.38, n = 142) and VATMS (MD 1.41; 95% CI − 4.37, 7.20; P = 0.63, n = 44) remained unchanged. Conclusion: There are subtle neural adaptations following resistance-training involving both cortical and subcortical adaptations that act to increase motoneurone activation and likely contribute to the training-related increase in muscle strength

Identifying the role of the reticulospinal tract for strength and motor recovery: A scoping review of nonhuman and human studies

In addition to the established postural control role of the reticulospinal tract (RST), there has been an increasing interest on its involvement in strength, motor recovery, and other gross motor functions. However, there are no reviews that have systematically assessed the overall motor function of the RST. Therefore, we aimed to determine the role of the RST underpinning motor function and recovery. We performed a literature search using Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus to retrieve papers using key words for RST, strength, and motor recovery. Human and animal studies which assessed the role of RST were included. Studies were screened and 32 eligible studies were included for the final analysis. Of these, 21 of them were human studies while the remaining were on monkeys and rats. Seven experimental animal studies and four human studies provided evidence for the involvement of the RST in motor recovery, while two experimental animal studies and eight human studies provided evidence for strength gain. The RST influenced gross motor function in two experimental animal studies and five human studies. Overall, the RST has an important role for motor recovery, gross motor function and at least in part, underpins strength gain. The role of RST for strength gain in healthy people and its involvement in spasticity in a clinical population has been limitedly described. Further studies are required to ascertain the role of the RST's role in enhancing strength and its contribution to the development of spasticity

Increased cross-education of muscle strength and reduced corticospinal inhibition following eccentric strength training

AIM: Strength training of one limb results in a substantial increase in the strength of the untrained limb, however, it remains unknown what the corticospinal responses are following either eccentric or concentric strength training and how this relates to the cross-education of strength. The aim of this study was to determine if eccentric or concentric unilateral strength training differentially modulates corticospinal excitability, inhibition and the cross-transfer of strength. METHODS: Changes in contralateral (left limb) concentric strength, eccentric strength, motor-evoked potentials, short-interval intracortical inhibition and silent period durations were analyzed in groups of young adults who exercised the right wrist flexors with either eccentric (N=9) or concentric (N=9) contractions for 12 sessions over 4weeks. Control subjects (N=9) did not train. RESULTS: Following training, both groups exhibited a significant strength gain in the trained limb (concentric group increased concentric strength by 64% and eccentric group increased eccentric strength by 62%) and the extent of the cross-transfer of strength was 28% and 47% for the concentric and eccentric group, respectively, which was different between groups (P=0.031). Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed that eccentric training reduced intracortical inhibition (37%), silent period duration (15-27%) and increased corticospinal excitability (51%) compared to concentric training for the untrained limb (P=0.033). There was no change in the control group. CONCLUSION: The results show that eccentric training uniquely modulates corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the untrained limb to a greater extent than concentric training. These findings suggest that unilateral eccentric contractions provide a greater stimulus in cross-education paradigms and should be an integral part of the rehabilitative process following unilateral injury to maximize the response