Returns to Investment in Ontario University Education, 1960-1990, and Implications for Tuition Fee Policy

Because students' university enrolment decisions are influenced by expected returns to their educational investment, policy decisions should be informed by calculations of such returns. Private rates of return, by field of study, for Ontario university graduates in 1990 ranged from 7% (humanities) to 21% (medicine). Returns were generally higher for women than for men. The 1990 results were virtually unchanged from 1985 when there was a sharp reversal of the long-run decline in rates of return that occurred from 1960 to 1980. Alternative assumptions about tuition fee levels show that doubling tuition fees from 1990 levels, or abolishing fees, would change the rates of return by only about two percentage points in either direction. Doubling fees in the major professional faculties would leave rates of return still in excess of returns to arts and science at current fee levels.Les personnes, qui décident si elles veulent fréquenter l'université, tiennent compte du rendement du capital qu'elles auraient à investir aux fins de leurs études. Par conséquent, ce facteur devrait être pris en considération dans l'élaboration des politiques en matière d'enseignement supérieur. Selon la discipline de formation, les taux de rendement propres aux diplômés des universités ontariennes variaient en 1990 de 7% (lettres et sciences humaines) à 21% (médecine). Les taux en question étaient en général plus élevés chez les femmes que chez les hommes. Les résultats de 1990 étaient à peu près identiques à ceux de 1985, soit l'année où un net revirement s'était produit par rapport à la diminution constante des taux qui avait eu lieu de 1960 à 1980. Selon d'autres hypothèses sur les incidences du niveau des frais de scolarité, le fait de doubler les frais en vigueur en 1990 ou de carrément les abolir donnerait lieu à une variation du taux de rendement n'atteignant qu'environ deux pour cent dans un sens ou dans l'autre. Même si les frais de scolarité perçus par les principales faculté professionnelles étaient doublés, les taux de rendement de leurs diplômes seraient toujours supérieurs à ceux que les diplômes des programmes d'arts et de sciences obtiennent en fonction des frais de scolarité actuels

Full lifetime perspectives on the costs and benefits of lay date variation in tree swallows

Animals must balance various costs and benefits when deciding when to breed. The costs and benefits of breeding at different times have received much attention, but most studies have been limited to investigating short-term season-to-season fitness effects. However, breeding early, versus late, in a season may influence lifetime fitness over many years, trading off in complex ways across the breeder?s lifepan. In this study, we examined the complete life histories of 867 female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) breeding in Ithaca, New York, between 2002 and 2016. Earlier breeders outperformed later breeders in short-term measures of reproductive output and offspring quality. Though there were weak indications that females paid long-term future survival costs for breeding early, lifetime fledgling output was markedly higher overall in early-breeding birds. Importantly, older females breeding later in the season did not experience compensating life-history advantages that suggested an alternative equal-fitness breeding strategy. Rather, most or all of the swallows appear to be breeding as early as they can, and differences in lay dates appear to be determined primarily by differences in individual quality or condition. Lay date had a significant repeatability across breeding attempts by the same female, and the first lay date of females fledged in our population was strongly influenced by the first lay date of their mothers, indicating the potential for ongoing selection on lay date. By examining performance over the entire lifespan of a large number of individuals, we were able to clarify the relationship between timing of breeding and fitness and gain new insight into the sources of variability in this important life history trait.Fil: Winkler, David Ward. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Hallinger, Kelly K.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Pegan, Teresa M.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Taff, Conor C.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Verhoeven, Mo A.. University of Groningen; Países BajosFil: Van Oordt, David Chang. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Stager, Maria. University of Montana; Estados UnidosFil: Uehling, Jennifer J.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Vitousek, Maren N.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Andersen, Michael J.. University of New Mexico; Estados UnidosFil: Ardia, Daniel R.. Franklin & Marshall College; Estados UnidosFil: Belmaker, Amos. Tel Aviv University; IsraelFil: Ferretti, Valentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Forsman, Anna M.. University Of Central Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Gaul, Jennifer R.. International High School at La Guardia Community College; Estados UnidosFil: Llambias, Paulo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; ArgentinaFil: Orzechowski, Sophia C.. Harvard University; Estados UnidosFil: Shipley, Ryan. Max Planck Institute For Animal Behavior; AlemaniaFil: Wilson, Maya. Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Department Of Geological Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Yoon, Hyun Seok. University of Tennessee; Estados Unido