10 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
An algal enzyme required for biosynthesis of the most abundant marine carotenoids.
Fucoxanthin and its derivatives are the main light-harvesting pigments in the photosynthetic apparatus of many chromalveolate algae and represent the most abundant carotenoids in the world's oceans, thus being major facilitators of marine primary production. A central step in fucoxanthin biosynthesis that has been elusive so far is the conversion of violaxanthin to neoxanthin. Here, we show that in chromalveolates, this reaction is catalyzed by violaxanthin de-epoxidase-like (VDL) proteins and that VDL is also involved in the formation of other light-harvesting carotenoids such as peridinin or vaucheriaxanthin. VDL is closely related to the photoprotective enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase that operates in plants and most algae, revealing that in major phyla of marine algae, an ancient gene duplication triggered the evolution of carotenoid functions beyond photoprotection toward light harvesting
Implementing Precision Approaches Supported by Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems in the Austrian Alps
A COMPARISON OF THE N-ALKYL GROUP SPECIFICITY OF CHOLINE ACETYLTRANSFERASE FROM DIFFERENT SPECIES.
Joint estimation of vertical total electron content (VTEC) and satellite differential code biases (SDCBs) using low-cost receivers
Vertical total electron content (VTEC) parameters estimated using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data are of great interest for ionosphere sensing. Satellite differential code biases (SDCBs) account for one source of error which, if left uncorrected, can deteriorate performance of positioning, timing and other applications. The customary approach to estimate VTEC along with SDCBs from dual-frequency GNSS data, hereinafter referred to as DF approach, consists of two sequential steps. The first step seeks to retrieve ionospheric observables through the carrier-to-code leveling technique. This observable, related to the slant total electron content (STEC) along the satelliteâreceiver line-of-sight, is biased also by the SDCBs and the receiver differential code biases (RDCBs). By means of thin-layer ionospheric model, in the second step one is able to isolate the VTEC, the SDCBs and the RDCBs from the ionospheric observables. In this work, we present a single-frequency (SF) approach, enabling the joint estimation of VTEC and SDCBs using low-cost receivers; this approach is also based on two steps and it differs from the DF approach only in the first step, where we turn to the precise point positioning technique to retrieve from the single-frequency GNSS data the ionospheric observables, interpreted as the combination of the STEC, the SDCBs and the biased receiver clocks at the pivot epoch. Our numerical analyses clarify how SF approach performs when being applied to GPS L1 data collected by a single receiver under both calm and disturbed ionospheric conditions. The daily time series of zenith VTEC estimates has an accuracy ranging from a few tenths of a TEC unit (TECU) to approximately 2 TECU. For 73â96% of GPS satellites in view, the daily estimates of SDCBs do not deviate, in absolute value, more than 1 ns from their ground truth values published by the Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe
Possible ionospheric anomalies associated with the 2009 Mw 6.4 Taiwan earthquake from DEMETER and GNSS TEC
GNSS TEC-Based Detection and Analysis of Acoustic-Gravity Waves From the 2012 Sumatra Double Earthquake Sequence
International audienceThe Wharton Basin earthquake sequence on April 11, 2012, offshore Sumatra, represents the two largest (Mw > 8.0) strike-slip earthquakes ever recorded. Ground fault displacements generated a spectrum of acoustic-gravity waves due to solid Earth-atmosphere coupling. Wave-like perturbations in Total Electron Content (TEC) were therefore observed in ground-based Global Positioning System data. The waves arrive about 10 min after each earthquake and their spectral analysis reveals the presence of acoustic resonance frequencies of 3.8 and 4.4 mHz. The acoustic wave speeds of 0.9-1.2 km/s suggest coseismic ground movement as the primary wave generating mechanism instead of seismic Rayleigh waves. Gravity waves with frequencies below 2 mHz traveling with lower speeds of 0.21 km/s are also detected. Ray tracing using a simple numerical model traced the source of observed ionospheric perturbations to within 150 km distance of the epicenters. Large amplitude ionospheric disturbances were found to travel mostly in a north-south direction, an observation explained by the orientation of Earth's geomagnetic field
Ionosphere Monitoring
Global navigation satellite system (GSSS)-based
monitoring of the ionosphere is important in
a twofold manner. Firstly, GNSS measurements
provide valuable ionospheric information for correcting
and mitigating ionospheric range errors or
to warn users in particular in precise and safety
of life (SoL) applications. Secondly, spatial and
temporal resolution of ground- and space-based
measurements is high enough to explore the dynamics
of ionospheric processes such as the origin
and propagation of ionospheric storms.
It is discussed how ground- and space-based
GNSS measurements are used to create globalmaps
of total electron content (TEC) and to reconstruct
the highly variable three-dimensional (3-D) electron
density distribution on global scale under
perturbed conditions. Thus, the monitoring results
can be used for correcting ionospheric errors in
single-frequency applications as well as for studying
the driving forces of space weather-induced
perturbation features at a broad range of temporal
and spatial scales. Whereas large- and mediumscale
perturbations affect accuracy and reliability
of GNSS measurements, small-scale plasma irregularities
and plasma bubbles have a direct impact
on the continuity of GNSS availability by causing
strong and rapid fluctuations of the signal
strength, known as radio scintillations.
It is discussed how better understanding of
space weather-related phenomena may help to
model and forecast ionospheric behavior even
under perturbed conditions. Hence, ionospheric
monitoring contributes to the successful mitigation
of range errors or performance degradation
associated with the ionospheric impact on a broad
spectrum of GNSS applications