Measurement properties of patient‐reported outcome measures for eczema control: a systematic review

Atopic eczema (herein referred to as ‘eczema’) is a skin disease characterized by remitting and relapsing symptoms. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative was developed to establish a core outcome set (COS) for eczema to be measured for all future eczema trials. The core outcome set for atopic eczema clinical trials includes the domain for patient-reported eczema control, but a review of the validation of available eczema control instruments was lacking. We aimed to review the literature and systematically assess the measurement properties of validated patient-reported outcome instruments that capture eczema control. PubMed and Ovid EMBASE were searched up to 24 January 2020 for any study that reported on PROM instrument development or validation. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria were used to assess the quality of eligible studies. We screened 12 036 titles and abstracts and 58 full texts. A total of 12 papers were included, reporting on seven PROMS. These were assessed with respect to development, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. Two instruments, Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) and the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), have been developed and validated to a sufficient standard to support their recommendation as patient-reported outcome instruments for measuring control of atopic eczema as part of the HOME Core Outcome Set

Azathioprine in combination with methotrexate: a therapeutic alternative in severe and recalcitrant forms of alopecia areata?

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disfiguring autoimmune disease mediated by T lymphocytes targeting hair follicles.1 Its incidence increases almost linearly with age, corresponding to a cumulative lifetime incidence of 2.1%.2 Spontaneous regrowth is possible in patients with limited hair loss, whereas <25% of patients suffering of extensive forms of AA [alopecia totalis (AT)/alopecia universalis (AU) or severe multiple AA (MAA)] experience hair regrowth without any therapy.3 We tested azathioprine (AZA) plus methotrexate (MTX) as a rescue treatment in a group of patients with severe AA for whom a first‐line systemic treatment was ineffective (Table 1). All patients underwent to high‐dose pulsed corticosteroids (HDPCT) followed by MTX, as previously described.4 AZA was added to MTX after at least 6 months of total absence, or cosmetically inacceptable, of hair regrowth. Before starting AZA, thiopurine‐methyltransferase (TPMT) genetic testing was performed

The presence of sulfites in 'natural rubber latex' and 'synthetic' rubber gloves: an experimental pilot study

status: publishe

Efficacy and Safety of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Antagonists for Folliculitis Decalvans: A Retrospective Case-series Pilot Study

International audienceFolliculitis decalvans is a chronic inflammatory skin disease leading to scarring alopecia. Management of this disabling disease is difficult and no treatment is currently approved. Current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of folliculitis decalvans suggests the benefit of using anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α for management of folliculi-tis decalvans. A single-centre retrospective pilot study included patients with refractory folliculitis decalvans treated by tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. An Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score was de-signed and validated to assess the efficacy of the th-erapy. Response to treatment was considered good to excellent when an IGA ≤ 2 was obtained at month 12. Eleven patients were included, with a mean time from diagnosis of folliculitis decalvans to the introduction of infliximab (n = 9) or adalimumab (n = 2) of 8.55 ± 1.26 years. Nine patients had failed on at least 2 lines of systemic therapies before starting anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. The median IGA score at baseline was 3. At the end of follow-up, 5 patients were considered responders. Overall, the safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α was good. The results suggest that the clinical benefit of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α is obtained after at least 6 months of treatment. How-ever, further prospective studies are needed to con-firm these results