Pattern of disocclusion in patients with complete cleft lip and palate Padrão de desoclusão em indivíduos com fissura lábio-palatina completa

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the pattern of disocclusion during excursive mandibular movements and presence or absence of occlusal interferences and occlusal pathologies (gingival recession and abfraction). METHOD: examination of 120 individuals divided into two groups, as follows: Group 1 - 90 patients with complete cleft lip and palate (study group), subdivided into 30 patients with complete left unilateral cleft lip and palate, 30 patients with complete right unilateral cleft lip and palate and 30 patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate; Group 2 - 30 individuals without clefts (control group). RESULTS: 58.8% of patients in Group 1 presented unilateral or bilateral canine guidance, 26.6% presented unilateral or bilateral group function and 54.4% presented lateral movements through the posterior teeth. Regarding protrusive movements, 80% presented anterior guidance and 20% presented posterior guidance. In Group 2, 69.6% of individuals presented unilateral or bilateral canine guidance, 43.2% presented unilateral or bilateral group function and only 13.3% presented lateral movements through the posterior teeth; 3.4% presented protrusion through the posterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: there was no difference in the pattern of disocclusion between subgroups of patients with clefts. Group 2 presented predominance of bilateral group function, whereas Group 1 presented a higher prevalence of posterior guidance during lateral movements. Protrusion occurred primarily through anterior guidance in Group 2 and through the posterior teeth in Group 1. There was high prevalence of occlusal interferences at the molar area for both groups, yet with no correlation with occlusal pathologies (recession and abfraction).<br>OBJETIVO: avaliar o padrão de desoclusão apresentado nos movimentos excursivos mandibulares e a presença ou não de interferências oclusais e patologias relacionadas à oclusão (recessão gengival e abfração). MÉTODO: exame de 120 indivíduos, divididos em 2 grupos: Grupo 1 - 90 pacientes com fissura completa de lábio e palato, subdivididos em 30 pacientes com fissura completa de lábio e palato unilateral esquerda, 30 pacientes com fissura completa de lábio e palato unilateral direita e 30 com fissura completa de lábio e palato bilateral; e Grupo 2 - 30 indivíduos sem fissuras (grupo controle). RESULTADOS: 58,8% do Grupo 1 apresentaram guia canina uni ou bilateralmente, 26,6% apresentaram desoclusão com função em grupo uni ou bilateral e 54,4% realizaram estes movimentos laterais através dos dentes posteriores; 80% dos pacientes do Grupo 1 realizava protrusão pelos dentes anteriores e 20 % pelos posteriores. Para o Grupo 2, guia canina uni ou bilateral foi observada em 69,6% dos indivíduos, 43,2% apresentaram função em grupo uni ou bilateral e somente 13,3% realizaram os movimentos laterais pelos dentes posteriores. Apenas 3,4% dos indivíduos do Grupo 2 apresentaram protrusão pelos dentes posteriores. CONCLUSÕES: não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa no padrão de desoclusão entre os subgrupos de pacientes com fissuras. O Grupo 2 apresentou predominância de função em grupo bilateral, enquanto o Grupo 1 apresentou maior prevalência de guia posterior durante os movimentos laterais. A protrusão ocorreu principalmente por guia anterior no Grupo 2 e pelos dentes posteriores no Grupo 1. Houve alta prevalência de interferências oclusais na região de molares para ambos os grupos, entretanto sem correlação com patologias oclusais (recessão e abfração)

Risk factors for hospitalized patients with resistant or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Identifying risk factors predicting acquisition of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa will aid surveillance and diagnostic initiatives and can be crucial in early and appropriate antibiotic therapy. We conducted a systematic review examining risk factors of acquisition of resistant P. aeruginosa among hospitalized patients. Methods MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central were searched between 2000 and 2016 for studies examining independent risk factors associated with acquisition of resistant P. aeruginosa, among hospitalized patients. Random effects model meta-analysis was conducted when at least three or more studies were sufficiently similar. Results Of the 54 eligible articles, 28 publications (31studies) examined multi-drug resistant (MDR) or extensively drug resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa and 26 publications (29 studies) examined resistant P. aeruginosa. The acquisition of MDR P. aeruginosa, as compared with non-MDR P. aeruginosa, was significantly associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission (3 studies: summary adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.2) or use of quinolones (4 studies: summary adjusted OR 3.59). Acquisition of MDR or XDR compared with susceptible P. aeruginosa was significantly associated with prior hospital stay (4 studies: summary adjusted OR 1.90), use of quinolones (3 studies: summary adjusted OR 4.34), or use of carbapenems (3 studies: summary adjusted OR 13.68). The acquisition of MDR P. aeruginosa compared with non-P. aeruginosa was significantly associated with prior use of cephalosporins (3 studies: summary adjusted OR 3.96), quinolones (4 studies: summary adjusted OR 2.96), carbapenems (6 studies: summary adjusted OR 2.61), and prior hospital stay (4 studies: summary adjusted OR 1.74). The acquisition of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa compared with susceptible P. aeruginosa, was statistically significantly associated with prior use of piperacillin-tazobactam (3 studies: summary adjusted OR 2.64), vancomycin (3 studies: summary adjusted OR 1.76), and carbapenems (7 studies: summary adjusted OR 4.36). Conclusions Prior use of antibiotics and prior hospital or ICU stay was the most significant risk factors for acquisition of resistant P. aeruginosa. These findings provide guidance in identifying patients that may be at an elevated risk for a resistant infection and emphasize the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and infection control in hospitals

Ajuste social em pacientes com transtorno afetivo bipolar, unipolar, distimia e depressão dupla Social disability in patients with bipolar and unipolar affective disorders, dysthymia and double depression

OBJETIVOS: Dados internacionais mostram que os transtornos afetivos têm uma prevalência de, aproximadamente, 11,3% da população. Além disso, são uma das doenças que mais geram perdas sociais e nos relacionamentos familiares. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o ajuste social e familiar de pacientes com transtornos afetivos (bipolar, unipolar, distimia e com depressão dupla), comparando o resultado entre as categorias diagnósticas, além de verificar quais variáveis estão associadas e conduzem ao pior ajuste. MÉTODOS: Foram feitos a caracterização socioeconômica e demográfica e um levantamento dos dados de evolução e de história da doença por meio de um questionário elaborado para essa finalidade. Para a avaliação de ajuste social, utilizou-se a Escala de Avaliação da Incapacitação Psiquiátrica (DAS/OMS, 1998). O relacionamento familiar foi avaliado pelo Global Assessment of Relational Functioning Scale (GARF/APA, 1994). Foram estudados 100 pacientes em tratamento, por pelo menos seis meses, no Ambulatório de Psiquiatria da Faculdade de Medicina Unesp, Botucatu, SP. RESULTADOS/CONCLUSÕES: Com predomínio de mulheres, a maioria dos pacientes tinha no mínimo dois anos de seguimento, idade acima de 50 anos, baixa escolaridade e nível socioeconômico baixo. Não houve diferença estatística significativa quanto aos dados socioeconômicos e demográficos. Na análise de regressão logística, o diagnóstico e o relacionamento familiar tiveram papel significativo no resultado de ajustamento social. Os pacientes unipolares e os distímicos tiveram melhores resultados no ajustamento social e no relacionamento familiar do que os bipolares e aqueles com depressão dupla.<br>OBJECTIVES: International data show that affective disorders have a prevalence of 11.3% in the general population. Besides that, they are responsible for social dysfunctioning and family relationship distress. The aim of this study was to assess social and family disability in affective disorder patients (bipolar and unipolar disorders, dysthymia, and double depression); and then compare the results among diagnostic groups to identify variables associated with an increased level of disability. METHODS: Socioeconomic and demographic data as well as evolution, outcome and disease history data were collected using a specific questionnaire. To assess social disability, the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS-WHO, 1988) was used. Family relationship distress was assessed through the Global Assessment of Relational Functioning Scale (GARF-APA, 1994). A hundred patients who were under treatment for at least 6 months at the university outpatient clinic were studied. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients were females, 50 years old or more, had at least 2 years of follow-up, and low educational and socioeconomic level. There was no statistical significant differences among demographic and socioeconomic levels and different diagnostic categories. Logistic regression analysis showed an important impact in social functioning due to the diagnosis and family relationship. Unipolar and dysthymic patients had better outcome in social and family functioning than bipolar and double depression ones