The digestive performance of mammalian herbivores: why big may not be that much better

1. A traditional approach to the nutritional ecology of herbivores is that larger animals can tolerate a diet of lesser quality due to a higher digestive efficiency bestowed on them by comparatively long ingesta retention times and lower relative energy requirements. 2. There are important physiological disadvantages that larger animals must compensate for, namely a lower gut surface : gut volume ratio, larger ingesta particle size and greater losses of faecal bacterial material due to more fermentation. Compensating adaptations could include an increased surface enlargement in larger animals, increased absorption rates per unit of gut surface, and increased gut motility to enhance mixing of ingesta. 3. A lower surface : volume ratio, particularly in sacciform forestomach structures, could be a reason for the fact that methane production is of significant scope mainly in large herbivores and not in small herbivores with comparably long retention times; in the latter, the substrate for methanogenesis – the volatile fatty acids – could be absorbed faster due to a more favourable gut surface : volume ratio. 4. Existing data suggest that in herbivores, an increase in fibre digestibility is not necessarily accompanied by an increase in overall apparent dry matter digestibility. This indicates a comparative decrease of the apparent digestibility of non-fibre material, either due to a lesser utilization of non-fibre substrate or an increased loss of endogenous/bacterial substance. Quantitative research on these mechanisms is warranted in order to evaluate whether an increase in body size represents a net increase of digestive efficiency or just a shift of digestive focus

Sincronização da ovulação em fêmeas suínas submetidas ao desmame precoce Synchronization of ovulation in sows in early weaning system

Verificou-se a eficiência de protocolos para sincronizar a ovulação em porcas desmamadas precocemente. Trinta porcas com média de 4,4± 2,0 partos e estádio de lactação de 14,8± 0,7 dias foram distribuídas em três grupos de 10 animais: 1- nenhum tratamento hormonal; 2- 1000 UI de PMSG, via intramuscular (IM), 48h pós-desmame e 0,25mg de GnRH, IM, 72h após a aplicação do PMSG; 3- 1000 UI de PMSG, IM, 48h pós-desmame e 500 UI de hCG, IM, 72h após o PMSG. O momento da ovulação foi detectado por ultra-sonografia transretal. A taxa de sincronização (ovulação até 48h após aplicação de hCG ou GnRH) dos grupos 2 e 3 (94,7%) foi maior (P<0,01) que no grupo controle (40%). Com o uso dos protocolos de sincronização de ovulação, as fêmeas tratadas apresentaram, em relação ao grupo controle, tendência de maior taxa de prenhez (95% vs. 70%; P<0,10) e similares intervalo do desmame ao estro (96,5± 3,0 vs. 130,2± 31,4h) e número de leitões nascidos vivos por fêmea gestante no primeiro cio pós-desmame (10,9± 0,8 vs. 12,0± 0,9). Dessa maneira, os protocolos de sincronização usados neste estudo foram eficientes em sincronizar a ovulação, e podem viabilizar o uso da inseminação artificial em horários predeterminados.<br>The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of two protocols in synchronize the ovulation of sows in early weaning system. Thirty multiparous crossbred (Large-White x Landrace) sows with a mean± SD of 4.4± 2.0 parturitions and 14.8± 0.7 days in lactation were divided into three groups of 10 animals each: group 1- control; group 2- received 1000 IU of PMSG (FOLLIGON® , INTERVET) IM, 48 hours after weaning + 0.25mg of GnRH (FERTAGIL® , INTERVET) IM, 72h after PMSG; group 3- received 1000 IU of PMSG 48 hours after weaning + 500 IU of hCG (PROFASI® , SERONO) IM, 72h after PMSG. Time of ovulation was monitored by transrectal ultrasound. Synchronization of ovulation rates (ovulated within 48 hours after the treatment with hCG or GnRH) in groups 2 and 3 were higher (94.7%; P< 0.01) than in group 1 (40%). Sows from groups 2 and 3 showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate than those from group 1 (95% vs. 70%; P<0.10), but similar weaning-to-estrus interval (96.5± 3.0h vs. 130.2± 31.4h) and similar litter size (10.9± 0.8 vs. 12.0± 0.9), respectively. The data show that the protocols used in the current study were efficient in synchronize time of ovulation and render possible the use of AI at a predetermined moment