17 research outputs found
Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium and Zinc Utilization of Humans as Affected by Consumption of Black, Decaffeinated Black and Green Teas
Preparation Method and Final Internal Temperature Influences on Boneless Pork Loin Roast Quality Characteristics
Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms
Nous nous sommes demandĂ©s, dans cette Ă©tude, si les groupes Ă©taient mieux Ă mĂȘme de respecter les dĂ©lais quand leurs membres partageaient les mĂȘmes cognitions temporelles, câest-Ă -dire quand ils sâaccordaient sur les dimensions temporelles de leur tĂąche. Dans une Ă©tude longitudinale portant sur 31 groupes, nous avons Ă©tudiĂ© lâeffet des cognitions temporelles partagĂ©es sur le respect dâun dĂ©lai et explorĂ© deux antĂ©cĂ©dents des cognitions temporelles partagĂ©es: la cohĂ©rence des rythmes des membres du groupe et lâĂ©change des rappels concernant le temps. Nos rĂ©sultats montrent que ces deux facteurs ont un impact sur les cognitions temporelles partagĂ©es et cela Ă diffĂ©rentes Ă©tapes du travail collectif. De plus, il est apparu que les cognitions temporelles partagĂ©es pouvaient aussi bien faciliter que contrecarrer le respect des dĂ©lais: cela dĂ©pend des rythmes des membres du groupe. In this study, we examined whether groups were better able to meet deadlines when group members had shared temporal cognitions, that is, when they agreed on the temporal aspects of their task. In a longitudinal study involving 31 groups, we studied the effect of shared temporal cognitions on meeting a deadline and explored two antecedents of shared temporal cognitions: the similarity in group membersâ pacing styles and the exchange of temporal reminders. Our findings suggest that both antecedents are relevant to shared temporal cognitions, be it at different stages of group collaboration. Furthermore, we found that shared temporal cognitions may either facilitate or impede meeting a deadline, depending on the content of group membersâ pacing styles