Biological therapies in the systemic management of psoriasis: International Consensus Conference

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder that usually requires long-term treatment for control. Approximately 25% of patients have moderate to severe disease and require phototherapy, systemic therapy or both. Despite the availability of numerous therapeutic options, the long-term management of psoriasis can be complicated by treatment-related limitations. With advances in molecular research and technology, several biological therapies are in various stages of development and approval for psoriasis. Biological therapies are designed to modulate key steps in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Collectively, biologicals have been evaluated in thousands of patients with psoriasis and have demonstrated significant benefit with favourable safety and tolerability profiles. The limitations of current psoriasis therapies, the value of biological therapies for psoriasis, and guidance regarding the incorporation of biological therapies into clinical practice are discussed.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72815/1/j.1365-2133.2004.06070.x.pd

German evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris (short version)

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and chronic inflammatory skin disease which has the potential to significantly reduce the quality of life in severely affected patients. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5 to 2%. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed insufficient satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of medication non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. The guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults. The short version of the guidelines reported here consist of a series of therapeutic recommendations that are based on a systematic literature search and subsequent discussion with experts in the field; they have been approved by a team of dermatology experts. In addition to the therapeutic recommendations provided in this short version, the full version of the guidelines includes information on contraindications, adverse events, drug interactions, practicality, and costs as well as detailed information on how best to apply the treatments described (for full version, please see Nast et al., JDDG, Suppl 2:S1–S126, 2006; or http://www.psoriasis-leitlinie.de)

Definition of the post-thrombotic syndrome, differences between existing classifications

AbstractBackgroundAccepted diagnostic criteria exist for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, no uniform definition for the diagnosis and treatment of the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) exists. We examined the various definitions of PTS that are used and their relationships with invasive venous pressure measurement.MethodsPatients who had previously suffered a documented DVT underwent clinical evaluation of both lower limbs in which we used five clinical definitions to grade PTS. We included the definition of Widmer, the CEAP classification, the venous clinical severity score (also without compression therapy), and the definitions according to Prandoni and Brandjes in the evaluation. We compared all the clinical scoring systems with invasive ambulatory venous pressure measurement.ResultsIn total 124 patients were enrolled in whom both legs were evaluated. Thirteen patients had previously suffered bilateral DVT and nine patients had had an ipsilateral recurrent DVT. In the limbs with DVT, 10 (7%) to 29 (21%) were defined as severe PTS, compared to 0–4 (4%) in the control legs. Mild-to-moderate PTS in the DVT legs ranged from 23 to 49%, compared to 13–34% in the control legs. Overall the presence of any PTS in the DVT legs varied from 30% (VCS without compression) to 66% (Brandjes). The scoring systems of Brandjes and VCS showed a tendency towards more legs to be defined as severe PTS. Absolute frequencies of PTS in DVT legs were highest for the classifications according to Widmer, Prandoni and Brandjes. Differences in proportions of any PTS calculated between DVT and control legs varied from 18 to 39%, while odds ratios varied between 2.2 and 5.2 for the different definitions.The CEAP classification and definition of Brandjes show a moderate relation to Widmer, κ=0.53 and 0.52, respectively. The VCS shows in all comparisons a poor correlation (κ 0.22–0.41). Prandoni has a moderate correlation with most definitions (κ 0.40–0.44).ConclusionAll clinical definitions of PTS were highly associated with the reference standard of ambulatory venous pressure, with higher AVPs observed in the more severely affected groups. The ability of the scoring systems to discriminate between DVT and control legs as well as the observed prevalence of PTS differed substantially. In part this is due to the considerable overlap in AVP in the different clinical groups, reflecting the fact that our reference standard has substantial deficiencies. No clear advantage was found in any one system of classification over the rest