13 research outputs found

    Protein Phase Diagrams II: Nonideal Behavior of Biochemical Reactions in the Presence of Osmolytes

    Get PDF
    AbstractIn the age of biochemical systems biology, proteomics, and high throughput methods, the thermodynamic quantification of cytoplasmatic reaction networks comes into reach of the current generation of scientists. What is needed to efficiently extract the relevant information from the raw data is a robust tool for evaluating the number and stoichiometry of all observed reactions while providing a good estimate of the thermodynamic parameters that determine the molecular behavior. The recently developed phase-diagram method, strictly speaking a graphical representation of linkage or Maxwell Relations, offers such capabilities. Here, we extend the phase diagram method to nonideal conditions. For the sake of simplicity, we choose as an example a reaction system involving the protein RNase A, its inhibitor CMP, the osmolyte urea, and water. We investigate this system as a function of the concentrations of inhibitor and osmolyte at different temperatures ranging from 280K to 340K. The most interesting finding is that the protein-inhibitor binding equilibrium depends strongly on the urea concentration—by orders-of-magnitude more than expected from urea-protein interaction alone. Moreover, the m-value of ligand binding is strongly concentration-dependent, which is highly unusual. It is concluded that the interaction between small molecules like urea and CMP can significantly contribute to cytoplasmic nonideality. Such a finding is highly significant because of its impact on renal tissue where high concentrations of cosolutes occur regularly

    Hydrogen Exchange Kinetics of RNase A and the Urea:TMAO Paradigm †

    No full text

    Mixed osmolytes: The degree to which one osmolyte affects the protein stabilizing ability of another

    No full text
    Mixtures of organic osmolytes occur in cells of many organisms, raising the question of whether their actions on protein stability are independent or synergistic. To investigate this question it is desirable to develop a system that permits evaluation of the effect of one osmolyte on the efficacy of another to either force-fold or denature a protein. A means of evaluating the efficacy of an osmolyte is provided by its m-value, an experimental quantity that measures the ability of the osmolyte to force a protein to unfold or fold. An experimental system is presented that enables evaluations of the m-values of osmolytes in the presence and absence of a second osmolyte. The experimental system involves use of a marginally stable protein in 10 mM buffer (pH 7, 200 mM salt, and 34°C) that is at the midpoint of its native to denatured transition. These conditions enable determination of m-values for protecting and denaturing osmolytes in the presence and absence of a second osmolyte, permitting assessment of the extent to which the two osmolytes affect each other's efficacy. The two osmolytes investigated in this work are the denaturing osmolyte, urea, and the protecting osmolyte, sarcosine. Results show unequivocally that neither osmolyte alters the efficacy of the other in forcing the protein to fold or unfold—the osmolytes act independently on the protein despite their combined concentrations being in the multi-molar range. These osmolytes avoid altering one another's efficacy at these high concentrations because the number of osmolyte interaction sites on the protein is large and the binding constants are quite small. Consequently, the site occupancies are low enough in number that the two osmolytes neither compete nor cooperate in interacting with the protein
    corecore