190 research outputs found

    ON THE APPLICATION OF MULTIGROUP DIFFUSION THEORY TO FAST CRITICAL ASSEMBLIES

    Full text link
    Multigroup diffusion theory predicts too high a critical mass for small, highly enriched, critical assemblies. An attempt to improve the accuracy of diffusion theory predictions for fast reactors is described. Transport cross sections were adjusted on the basis of multigroup comparison of the Lady Godiva Reactor by diffusion theory and by the asymptotic solution to the Boltzmann equation. In general, the predictions made by the adjusted cross sections were in very good agreement with experiment. The procedure described is not recommended as a panacea but indicates that modifications in elastic transport cross sections may make multigroup diffusion theory more applicable to a wide range of fast reactors. (T.R.H.

    SOME PHYSICS CALCULATIONS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LARGE FAST BREEDER POWER REACTORS

    Get PDF
    Critical mass, spectrum, breeding ratio, and coolant removal coefficients were calculated for a series of large Pu- U/sup 238/-fueled sodium- cooled fast-breeder power reactors, using a new 16-group cross-section set based in pant on recent miscroscopic cross-section measurements. The parameters studied include reactor size, plutonium isotopic content, and type of structural material. Reactors cooled with Pb - Bi eutectic and those contaiing U/sup 233/- Th fuel were examined. (auath

    What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?

    Get PDF
    There have been periodic claims that evolutionary biology needs urgent reform, and this article tries to account for the volume and persistence of this discontent. It is argued that a few inescapable properties of the field make it prone to criticisms of predictable kinds, whether or not the criticisms have any merit. For example, the variety of living things and the complexity of evolution make it easy to generate data that seem revolutionary (e.g. exceptions to well-established generalizations, or neglected factors in evolution), and lead to disappointment with existing explanatory frameworks (with their high levels of abstraction, and limited predictive power). It is then argued that special discontent stems from misunderstandings and dislike of one well-known but atypical research programme: the study of adaptive function, in the tradition of behavioural ecology. To achieve its goals, this research needs distinct tools, often including imaginary agency, and a partial description of the evolutionary process. This invites mistaken charges of narrowness and oversimplification (which come, not least, from researchers in other subfields), and these chime with anxieties about human agency and overall purpose. The article ends by discussing several ways in which calls to reform evolutionary biology actively hinder progress in the field
    corecore