Adenomyoepithelial tumours and myoepithelial carcinomas of the breast – a spectrum of monophasic and biphasic tumours dominated by immature myoepithelial cells

BACKGROUND: Adenomyoepithelial tumours and myoepithelial carcinomas of the breast are primarily defined by the presence of neoplastic cells with a myoepithelial immunophenotype. Current classification schemes are based on purely descriptive features and an assessment of individual prognosis is still problematic. METHODS: A series of 27 adenomyoepithelial tumours of the breast was analysed immunohistochemically with antibodies directed against various cytokeratins, p63, smooth muscle alpha-actin (SMA) and vimentin. Additionally, double immunofluorescence and comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) was performed. RESULTS: Immunohistochemically, all the tumours showed a constant expression of high molecular weight cytokeratins (Ck) Ck5 and Ck14, p63, SMA and vimentin. With exception of one case diagnosed as myoepithelial carcinoma, all tested tumours expressed low molecular weight cytokeratin Ck18 in variable proportions of cells. Even in monophasic tumours lacking obvious glandular differentiation in conventional staining, a number of neoplastic cells still expressed those cytokeratins. Double immunofluorescence revealed tumour cells exclusively staining for Ck5/Ck14 in the presence of other cell populations that co-expressed high molecular weight Ck5/Ck14 as well as either low molecular weight Ck8/18 or SMA. Based on morphology, we assigned the series to three categories, benign, borderline and malignant. This classification was supported by a stepwise increase in cytogenetic alterations on CGH. CONCLUSION: Adenomyoepithelial tumours comprise a spectrum of neoplasms consisting of an admixture of glandular and myoepithelial differentiation patterns. As a key component SMA-positive cells co-expressing cytokeratins could be identified. Although categorisation of adenomyoepithelial tumours in benign, borderline and malignant was supported by results of CGH, any assessment of prognosis requires to be firmly based on morphological grounds. At present it is not yet clear, if and to what extent proposed Ck5-positive progenitor cells contribute to the immunohistochemical and morphological heterogeneity of these neoplasms of the breast

Derivation of Myoepithelial Progenitor Cells from Bipotent Mammary Stem/Progenitor Cells

There is increasing evidence that breast and other cancers originate from and are maintained by a small fraction of stem/progenitor cells with self-renewal properties. Recent molecular profiling has identified six major subtypes of breast cancer: basal-like, ErbB2-overexpressing, normal breast epithelial-like, luminal A and B, and claudin-low subtypes. To help understand the relationship among mammary stem/progenitor cells and breast cancer subtypes, we have recently derived distinct hTERT-immortalized human mammary stem/progenitor cell lines: a K5+/K19− type, and a K5+/K19+ type. Under specific culture conditions, bipotent K5+/K19− stem/progenitor cells differentiated into stable clonal populations that were K5−/K19− and exhibit self-renewal and unipotent myoepithelial differentiation potential in contrast to the parental K5+/K19− cells which are bipotent. These K5−/K19− cells function as myoepithelial progenitor cells and constitutively express markers of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and show high invasive and migratory abilities. In addition, these cells express a microarray signature of claudin-low breast cancers. The EMT characteristics of an un-transformed unipotent mammary myoepithelial progenitor cells together with claudin-low signature suggests that the claudin-low breast cancer subtype may arise from myoepithelial lineage committed progenitors. Availability of immortal MPCs should allow a more definitive analysis of their potential to give rise to claudin-low breast cancer subtype and facilitate biological and molecular/biochemical studies of this disease

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: A proposal for classification

Breast lesions with a prominent myoepithelial cell component constitute a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations. These lesions are often dual epithelial‐myoepithelial but may be purely myoepithelial cell in nature. Benign epithelial‐myoepithelial lesions typically maintain the morphology and immunophenotype of the normal bilayer epithelial myoepithelial structures. However, the distinction between the two cell components is not always clear‐cut in malignant lesions in which the histogenesis of myoepithelial cells remains uncertain. Neoplastic biphasic epithelial‐myoepithelial lesions of the breast include adenomyoepithelioma (AME), pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Four histological patterns of classical AME have been described: tubular, lobulated, spindle cell and adenosis variants. Overlapping patterns occur and some AMEs display an intraductal papillary pattern that may represent a fifth variant. AME can be benign or malignant. Classical AME may show atypical features, which are not sufficient for the diagnosis of malignancy (atypical AME). Atypical AME is recognised as a lesion of uncertain malignant potential with limited metastatic capability. Based on the histological features, we propose a classification of malignant AME (M‐AME) into three variants: M‐AME in situ, M‐AME invasive and AME with invasive carcinoma. In this review, we provide an overview of myoepithelial lesions of the breast focusing on the classification of AME to improve not only the consistency of reporting but also help guide further management decision making

Persistent Triple-Negative Phenotype Is Associated with Poorest Outcome among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (BC) - Results of the Retrospective Multicenter PriMet Study Comparing Molecular BC Phenotypes in Primary Tumors and Corresponding Recurrences

Abstract Background: Patients with triple negative (TN) breast cancer (BC), defined by lack of both ER/PR expression and HER2 overexpression, have an unfavorable prognosis. Although phenotype changes between primary tumor (PT) and disease recurrence (DR) have been described, their clinical significance is still unclear. Methods: We conducted PriMet, a retrospective multicenter (n=11) study to compare BC phenotype in PT and corresponding DR. Inclusion criteria comprised (1) unilateral BC with subsequent/synchronous local/regional/distant DR and (2) immunohistochemical confirmation of DR. Our aim was to (a) evaluate discordance rates between PT/DR, (b) find predictors for discordance, and (c) analyze the impact of discordance on patient outcome. Results: 436 patients were entered into PriMet; 414 had no evidence of primary metastatic disease (M0). Median follow-up in patients alive at time of analysis was 73. 1 (4.4-293.6) months. Triple receptor status for PT and DR was available in 377 patients; 68 patients (18.0 %) showed TNBC in PT, 40 patients (10.6 %) had TNBC in both PT and DR (i.e. TNBC persistence); 28 patients (7.4 %) changed from TNBC to non-TNBC (15 became HER2 positive (4.0 %)). Status changes for ER and PR were significantly positively associated (P&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with either persistent TNBC or non-TNBC had a median age at diagnosis of 52.0 compared to 55.5 yrs for patients with discordant TN status (p=0.04). Compared to differing constellations, persistent TNBC was associated with higher tumor grade (p=0.018) as well as with both decreased disease-free survival (DFS) (see figure) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) in M0 patients. In multivariate analysis containing pT stage, nodal stage, tumor grade in PT, TNBC in PT and TNBC persistence, TNBC persistence remained significantly associated with decreased DFS and PRS. Conclusion: PriMet provides substantial evidence regarding potential phenotype changes in PT vs. DR and underlines the importance of immunohistochemical DR verification even in initially TN disease. TNBC persistence was significantly associated with adverse patient outcome. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-22.</jats:p

Genomic and transcriptomic characterization of desmoplastic small round cell tumors

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a highly aggressive soft tissue tumor primarily affecting children and young adults. Most cases display a pathognomonic EWSR1-WT1 gene fusion, presumably constituting the primary driver event. Little is, however, known about secondary genetic changes that may affect tumor progression. We here studied 25 samples from 19 DSRCT patients using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and found that all samples had copy number alterations. The most common imbalances were gain of chromosomes/chromosome arms 1/1q and 5/5p and loss of 6/6q and 16/16q, all occurring in at least eight of the patients. Five cases showed homozygous deletions, affecting a variety of known tumor suppressor genes, for example, CDKN2A and NF1. As almost all patients died of their disease, the impact of individual imbalances on survival could not be evaluated. Global gene expression analysis using mRNA sequencing on fresh-frozen samples from seven patients revealed a distinct transcriptomic profile, with enrichment of genes involved in neural differentiation. Two genes - GJB2 and GAL - that showed higher expression in DSRCT compared to control tumors could be further investigated for their potential as diagnostic markers at the protein level