55 research outputs found

    Soil Water Infiltration as Affected by the Use of the Paraplow

    Get PDF
    DOUBLE-RING infiltration measurements were made during the corn growing season to determine the effect of various tillage systems on 1- and 30-min cumulative infiltration at three locations in Iowa. The Paraplow*, a newly introduced tillage tool in North America, which loosens the soil but does not invert it, was compared with moldboard-plow, chisel-plow, and no-tillage treatments. The Paraplow treatment gave the highest 1- and 30-min cumulative infiltration throughout the growing season. Similar bulk densities to a depth of 10 cm were observed for all the tillage treatments except for immediately after fall tillage at one site where moldboard-plowed and chisel-plowed soils had the lowest bulk densities. No-tillage and Paraplow treatment plots generally had greater moisture contents in the top 10 cm. Deep, surface connected cracks enhanced soil water infiltration considerably, and residue cover, particularly on the surface of no-tillage and Paraplow treatment plots, seemed to prevent surface sealing that would restrict soil water infiltration

    Strip intercropping systems

    Get PDF
    Economic, environmental, and biological concerns prompt the search for alternative, sustainable, agricultural production systems. Farmers need cropping systems that reduce negative impacts on the environment while maintaining or even improving farm profitabilit

    Convergence of Agriculture and Energy: II. Producing Cellulosic Biomass for Biofuels

    Get PDF
    Global energy demand is increasing as known global petroleum supplies are decreas¬ing. Calls to supplement or replace the current fossil-based energy system with new, envi¬ronmentally and economically sustainable strategies continue to increase, especially in light of more expensive traditional energy sources. Various governmental agencies and working groups have set aggressive targets and timelines for decreasing fossil fuel consumption by substituting bio-based energy (Bush 2007; Foust et al. 2007; Perlack et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2004). The alignment and continuity of these goals is illustrated in Figure 1. Current biofuel production in the United States relies primarily on corn grain conver¬sion to ethanol, but future systems are expected to depend more intensively on plant biomass than on grain as a feedstock for production of ethanol and other biofuels. In addition, current cropping systems generally are designed to optimize grain production and are not designed to harvest all the aboveground portion of the plant for cellulose-containing biomass. Significant, immediate national investments are needed, along with changes in policy, to address chal¬lenges limiting the sustainable production and efficient use of cellulosic biomass as a fuel feedstock to meet anticipated U.S. demand. The Bush Administration outlined a portfolio of recommended technologies, pro¬cesses, and practices for bio-based energy production that targets improved rates of feedstock conversion and greater efficiency in energy use. The plan also states that a significant portion of the nation’s 2017 energy supply, especially transportation fuel, will come from conversion of biomass feedstock to liquid fuels. Considering just the biomass-derived fuels contribution, roughly 250 million tons or more of grain and cellulosic biomass per year will be needed to reach the 10-year goal, and 650 to 700 million tons per year of biomass to reach the 2025 goal (Figure 1)

    Local Difference Measures between Complex Networks for Dynamical System Model Evaluation

    Get PDF
    Acknowledgments We thank Reik V. Donner for inspiring suggestions that initialized the work presented herein. Jan H. Feldhoff is credited for providing us with the STARS simulation data and for his contributions to fruitful discussions. Comments by the anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged as they led to substantial improvements of the manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

    Thresher for Immature Soybeans 1

    No full text

    Hydraulic Core Extraction: Cutting Device for Soil–Root Studies

    Get PDF
    A critical objective of belowground research is to collect and process representative soil samples. Mechanical devices have been developed to quickly take soil cores in the field; however, techniques to rapidly process large-diameter soil cores are lacking. Our objective was to design and construct a soil extraction–cutting system that could effectively reduce processing time. Soil cores were extracted from large diameter steel core tubes using a custom hydraulic cylinder device that vertically pushes the soil core to a desired depth increment before cutting in a horizontal direction with another hydraulically driven device. As many as eight large cores per hour could be processed with this system. This system has been effectively used in processing soil samples from both agricultural and forestry sites to meet desired experimental goals

    Soil Water Infiltration as Affected by the Use of the Paraplow

    No full text
    DOUBLE-RING infiltration measurements were made during the corn growing season to determine the effect of various tillage systems on 1- and 30-min cumulative infiltration at three locations in Iowa. The Paraplow*, a newly introduced tillage tool in North America, which loosens the soil but does not invert it, was compared with moldboard-plow, chisel-plow, and no-tillage treatments. The Paraplow treatment gave the highest 1- and 30-min cumulative infiltration throughout the growing season. Similar bulk densities to a depth of 10 cm were observed for all the tillage treatments except for immediately after fall tillage at one site where moldboard-plowed and chisel-plowed soils had the lowest bulk densities. No-tillage and Paraplow treatment plots generally had greater moisture contents in the top 10 cm. Deep, surface connected cracks enhanced soil water infiltration considerably, and residue cover, particularly on the surface of no-tillage and Paraplow treatment plots, seemed to prevent surface sealing that would restrict soil water infiltration.This article is published as Mukhtar, S., J. L. Baker, R. Horton, and D. C. Erbach. "Soil water infiltration as affected by the use of the paraplow." Transactions of the ASAE 28, no. 6 (1985): 1811-1816. doi: 10.13031/2013.32524.</p
    • 

    corecore