10 research outputs found
Strain-Induce Shift of the Crystal-Field Splitting of SrTiO(3) Embedded in Scandate Multilayers
Strained SrTiO₃ layers have become of interest, since the paraelectric-to-ferroelectric transition temperature can be increased to room temperature. A linear relationship between strain and energy splitting of the fundamental transitions in the fine structure of Ti L(₂,₃) and O K edges is observed, that can be exploited to measure strain from electronic transitions, complementary to measuring local strain directly via high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images. In particular, for both methods, the geometrical phase analysis performed on high-resolution images and the measurement of the energy splitting by energy loss spectroscopy, tensile strain of SrTiO₃ layers was measured when grown on DyScO₃ and GdScO₃ substrates. The effect of strain on the electron loss near edge structure (ELNES) of the Ti L(₂,₃) edge in comparison to unstrained samples is analyzed. Ab initio calculations of the Ti L(₂,₃) and O K edge show a linear variation of the crystal field splitting with strain. Calculated and experimental values of the crystal field splitting show a very good agreement
Lithium ion storage in 1D and 2D redox active metal-organic frameworks
The lithium ion storage properties of a series of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with formula {[M(L)(H2O)2]H2O}n and [M(CA)(Pyz)]n (where L refers to the tetraoxolene ligands: CA = chloranilate and DHBQ = dihydroxybenzoquinone; Pyz = pyrazine; M = Fe and Mn) and exhibiting a 1D and 2D structure, respectively, have been studied. The 1D MOFs ({[M(L)(H2O)2]H2O}n) show higher reversible capacity values for lithium ion insertion with respect to 2D structures containing two organic ligands (M(CA)(Pyz)]n). The gravimetric capacity for the 1D Fe-CA MOF is 75 mAh/g at 2.16 mA/g (∼ 1 lithium atom per formula unit) higher than for the Mn complexes which is 65 mAh/g at 2.12 mA/g, though isostructural. Lithium ion insertion in the 1D Mn-CA chains takes place at 2.4 V vs. Li+/Li which is ∼700 mV higher than what is recorded for the Fe analogue. This result is most probably due to much more stable d5 electronic configuration of Mn2+ than d6 of Fe2+ in its isostructural Fe-based framework analogue of the final reduced phases. The 1D Fe-DHBQ capacity is higher than its manganese analogue 75 mAh/g at 2.5 mA/g (0.8 lithiums) against 40 mAh/g. In general, the high voltages of reaction in these 1D MOFs suggest that they involve the participation of the ligand on the redox processes along with the reduction of the transition metal if any. In fact, the potential of ion insertion changed depending on the metal. This fact along with the absence of evidence of conversion reaction by x-ray diffraction of cycled electrodes suggests that the charge delocalization may be all along the metal-ligand molecular framework participating as a whole hybrid unit in the lithium storage