3,505 research outputs found
Chemical and forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullet lots: Is a second shooter possible?
The assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) traumatized the
nation. In this paper we show that evidence used to rule out a second assassin
is fundamentally flawed. This paper discusses new compositional analyses of
bullets reportedly to have been derived from the same batch as those used in
the assassination. The new analyses show that the bullet fragments involved in
the assassination are not nearly as rare as previously reported. In particular,
the new test results are compared to key bullet composition testimony presented
before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). Matches of bullets
within the same box of bullets are shown to be much more likely than indicated
in the House Select Committee on Assassinations' testimony. Additionally, we
show that one of the ten test bullets is considered a match to one or more
assassination fragments. This finding means that the bullet fragments from the
assassination that match could have come from three or more separate bullets.
Finally, this paper presents a case for reanalyzing the assassination bullet
fragments and conducting the necessary supporting scientific studies. These
analyses will shed light on whether the five bullet fragments constitute three
or more separate bullets. If the assassination fragments are derived from three
or more separate bullets, then a second assassin is likely, as the additional
bullet would not easily be attributable to the main suspect, Mr. Oswald, under
widely accepted shooting scenarios [see Posner (1993), Case Closed, Bantam, New
York].Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS119 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Too Much, Too Little: Religion in the Public Schools
The current state of religion in the nation\u27s public schools is odd indeed. On the one hand, the courts have consistently held that public school teachers may not lead their students in an organized prayer. Yet on the other hand, most people seem to agree that there is no problem with those same teachers leading their students in the Pledge of Allegiance, an exercise that asks students on a daily basis, not only to explicitly recognize the existence of a single god, but also to link the nation\u27s very identity to that highly contested theological proposition. Likewise, despite the fact that the courts have unanimously rejected attempts by state and local educational authorities to alter their science curricula to achieve religious purposes, school boards around the country continue to take constitutionally questionable steps to undermine the presentation of evolution, perhaps the most central and robust theory in all of biology. Even where school boards fail to take explicit steps to curtail the teaching of evolution, reports suggest that science teachers self-censor and teach less evolution (if any) than they should. Finally, although it is often said that schools should teach their students the knowledge and information they need to participate intelligently in the nation\u27s public affairs, these schools often fail to teach students anything at all about religion, despite its obvious importance and prevalence not only within our borders, but around the world as well
A method for assessing the success and failure of community-level interventions in the presence of network diffusion, social reinforcement, and related social effects
Prevention and intervention work done within community settings often face
unique analytic challenges for rigorous evaluations. Since community prevention
work (often geographically isolated) cannot be controlled in the same way other
prevention programs and these communities have an increased level of
interpersonal interactions, rigorous evaluations are needed. Even when the
`gold standard' randomized control trials are implemented within community
intervention work, the threats to internal validity can be called into question
given informal social spread of information in closed network settings. A new
prevention evaluation method is presented here to disentangle the social
influences assumed to influence prevention effects within communities. We
formally introduce the method and it's utility for a suicide prevention program
implemented in several Alaska Native villages. The results show promise to
explore eight sociological measures of intervention effects in the face of
social diffusion, social reinforcement, and direct treatment. Policy and
research implication are discussed.Comment: 18 pages, 5 figure
Evaluation of the cardiovascular system during various circulatory stresses Progress report, 1 Sep. 1968 - 1 May 1969
Cardiac response to chemotherapy after myocardial infraction and diagnostic methods of heart disease in man and animal
Evaluation of omniweave reinforcement for composite fabrication
Molded composites made from type-2 Morganite and/or boron are suitable for structural skins. Layered-in-depth omniweave construction yields higher in-plane strength characteristics than fiber-pitch angle construction, and strength and moduli data vary with fiber orientation
- …
