What does the structure-function relationship of the HIV-1 Tat protein teach us about developing an AIDS vaccine?

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) trans-activator of transcription protein Tat is an important factor in viral pathogenesis. In addition to its function as the key trans-activator of viral transcription, Tat is also secreted by the infected cell and taken up by neighboring cells where it has an effect both on infected and uninfected cells. In this review we will focus on the relationship between the structure of the Tat protein and its function as a secreted factor. To this end we will summarize some of the exogenous functions of Tat that have been implicated in HIV-1 pathogenesis and the impact of structural variations and viral subtype variants of Tat on those functions. Finally, since in some patients the presence of Tat-specific antibodies or CTL frequencies are associated with slow or non-progression to AIDS, we will also discuss the role of Tat as a potential vaccine candidate, the advances made in this field, and the importance of using a Tat protein capable of eliciting a protective or therapeutic immune response to viral challenge

Tat-specific binding IgG and disease progression in HIV type 1-infected Ugandans.

There are data to suggest that both the humoral and cellular immune responses directed against Tat are beneficial in delaying HIV disease progression. We examined the association between the occurrence of Tat-specific binding antibodies (Abs) and different parameters of HIV-1 disease progression. We generated eight Tat proteins, derived from HIV-1 subtypes A, B, C, and D, and circulating recombinant form CRF01_AE. These proteins were used to screen for Tat-specific binding Abs by an ELISA. Using five Tat proteins, we investigated whether the occurrence of Tat-specific Abs within 2 years after seroconversion for the majority, affected disease progression over time among 126 participants using survival analysis and rate of CD4 decline. Of these, 52 participants with a sample at 1.5 and 4.5 years after seroconversion were further examined to study the effect of Tat-specific Ab loss or maintenance on disease progression. Finally, using all the eight Tat proteins, we also investigated whether specific Abs to these Tat proteins among 48 participants, grouped as rapid progressors (RP, n = 26) and long-term survivors (LTS, n = 22) according to their CD4 decline over time, affected disease progression. Survival analysis did not reveal any evidence of protection from progression by Tat-specific Abs. Comparison of rate of CD4 declines between individuals with and without Abs to any Tat protein showed only a small and borderline significant advantage of having Tat-specific Abs (p = 0.043). There was no correlation between either loss or maintenance of Tat-specific Abs and disease progression. Comparison of LTS with RP showed no evidence that Tat-specific Abs slows participants' disease progression. This study showed no evidence of a protective effect of having Tat-specific Abs among these Ugandan subjects

Association between different anti-Tat antibody isotypes and HIV disease progression: data from an African cohort

Background: The presence of IgG and IgM against Tat, an HIV protein important for viral replication and immune dysfunction, is associated with slow disease progression in clade B HIV-infected individuals. However, although Tat activities strictly depend on the viral clade, our knowledge about the importance of anti-Tat antibodies in non-clade B HIV infection is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with disease progression in non-clade B HIV-infected subjects and to study the relationship between anti-Tat humoral responses and immunological abnormalities. Methods: Anti-clade B and - clade C Tat IgG, IgM and IgA titers were assessed in serum samples from 96 cART-naive subjects with chronic HIV infection from Mbeya, Tanzania, and associated with CD4(+) T cell count, plasma viremia and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell phenotypes. Results: Anti-Tat IgM were preferentially detected in chronic HIV-infected subjects with low T cell activation (p-value = 0.03) and correlated with higher CD4(+) T cell counts and lower viral loads irrespective of the duration of infection (p-value = 0.019 and p-value = 0.037 respectively). Conversely, anti-Tat IgA were preferentially detected in individuals with low CD4(+) T cell counts and high viral load (p-value = 0.02 and p-value < 0.001 respectively). The simultaneous presence of anti-Tat IgG and IgM protected from fast CD4(+) T cell decline (p-value < 0.01) and accumulation of CD38(+) HLADR(+) CD8(+) T cells (p-value = 0.029). Conclusions: Anti-Tat IgG alone are not protective in non-clade B infected subjects, unless concomitant with IgM, suggesting a protective role of persistent anti-Tat IgM irrespective of the infecting clade