Corticosteroid-induced spinal epidural lipomatosis in the pediatric age group: report of a new case and updated analysis of the literature

Spinal epidural lipomatosis is a rare complication of chronic corticosteroid treatment. We report a new pediatric case and an analysis of this and 19 pediatric cases identified in the international literature. The youngest of these combined 20 patients was 5 years old when lipomatosis was diagnosed. Lipomatosis manifested after a mean of 1.3 (+/- 1.5) years (SD) (median, 0.8 years; range, 3 weeks - 6.5 years) of corticosteroid treatment. The corticosteroid dose at the time of presentation of the lipomatosis ranged widely, between 5 and 80 mg of prednisone/day. Back pain was the most common presenting symptom. Imaging revealed that lipomatosis almost always involved the thoracic spine, extending into the lumbosacral region in a subset of patients. Predominantly lumbosacral involvement was documented in only two cases. Although a neurological deficit at presentation was documented in about half of the cases, surgical decompression was not performed in the cases reported after 1996. Instead, reducing the corticosteroid dose (sometimes combined with dietary restriction to mobilize fat) sufficed to induce remission. In summary, pediatric spinal epidural lipomatosis remains a potentially serious untoward effect of corticosteroid treatment, which, if recognized in a timely manner, can have a good outcome with conservative treatment

Test–retest reliability of an infectious disease questionnaire and evaluation of self-assessed vulnerability to infections

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Large scale population-based studies focusing on infectious diseases are scarce. This may be explained by methodological obstacles concerning ascertainment of data on infectious diseases requiring, e.g. collection of data on relatively short-termed symptoms and/or collection of biosamples for pathogen identification during a narrow time window. In the German National Cohort (GNC), a novel self-administered questionnaire will be used in addition to biosampling to collect data on selected infectious diseases and symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate in Pretest 2 of the GNC newly added items on self-assessed vulnerability to several infectious diseases and to assess test–retest reliability of the questionnaire. METHODS: The study was conducted in two study centres (Hamburg and Hanover) during Pretest 2 of the GNC. A self-administered paper questionnaire was applied. In Hamburg, participants were asked to fill in the questionnaire during their regular visit at the study centre. For test–retest reliability, participants in Hanover filled in the same questionnaire at home twice. To evaluate agreement, item-related percentage agreement and kappa (κ) were calculated. In addition, we computed Bennet’s S and Krippendorf’s alpha (α). Items on self-assessed vulnerability to infections were evaluated by comparing them with the corresponding self-reported frequency of infections. An explanatory factor analysis was applied to construct the scores of self-reported infection frequency and self-assessed vulnerability to infections. RESULTS: The evaluation of the internal consistency of the five-item instrument of self-assessed vulnerability to infections resulted in a Cronbach’s α of 0.78. The factor analysis yielded evidence of one factor. The factor was divided into three groups (lowest quintile classified as “less prone to infections” compared to peers; second, middle and fourth quintiles classified as “similarly prone to infections” and highest quintile classified as “more prone to infections”). Participants classified as “less prone to infections” reported fewer infections than participants classified as “more prone to infections”. Spearman’s correlation of the two scores (self-reported infection frequency and self-assessed vulnerability to infection) was 0.50 (p < 0.0001). For quantifying reliability, 88 participants with a median time of 8 days between filling in both questionnaires could be included in the analysis; for items sensitive to disease occurrence between both questionnaires only participants with no relevant disease in this time interval were included (n = 75). The weighted κ ranged between 0.65 and 0.87 for the items on infectious disease frequency in the last 12 months, for items on symptom frequency in the past 12 months between 0.77 and 0.90, and for items on vulnerability compared to peers between 0.68 and 0.76. CONCLUSION: A five-item instrument on self-assessed vulnerability to infections seems to be promising, but requires further evaluation. Overall, the questionnaire on self-reported infectious diseases used in Pretest 2 of the GNC is a moderately reliable instrument and, thus, can be applied in future studies on infectious diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-2045-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Systemic Type I IFN Inflammation in Human ISG15 Deficiency Leads to Necrotizing Skin Lesions

Most monogenic disorders have a primary clinical presentation. Inherited ISG15 deficiency, however, has manifested with two distinct presentations to date: susceptibility to mycobacterial disease and intracranial calcifications from hypomorphic interferon-II (IFN-II) production and excessive IFN-I response, respectively. Accordingly, these patients were managed for their infectious and neurologic complications. Herein, we describe five new patients with six novel ISG15 mutations presenting with skin lesions who were managed for dermatologic disease. Cellularly, we denote striking specificity to the IFN-I response, which was previously assumed to be universal. In peripheral blood, myeloid cells display the most robust IFN-I signatures. In the affected skin, IFN-I signaling is observed in the keratinocytes of the epidermis, endothelia, and the monocytes and macrophages of the dermis. These findings define the specific cells causing circulating and dermatologic inflammation and expand the clinical spectrum of ISG15 deficiency to dermatologic presentations as a third phenotype co-dominant to the infectious and neurologic manifestations.Fil: Martin Fernandez, Marta. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados Unidos. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Bravo García Morato, María. Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de la Paz.; EspañaFil: Gruber, Conor. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados Unidos. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Murias Loza, Sara. Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de la Paz.; EspañaFil: Malik, Muhammad Nasir Hayat. Twincore; Alemania. University Of Lahore; Países Bajos. Leibniz Universitat Hannover; Alemania. Helmholtz Gemeinschaft; AlemaniaFil: Alsohime, Fahad. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Alakeel, Abdullah. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Valdez, Rita. Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos Doctor Cosme Argerich; ArgentinaFil: Buta, Sofija. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados UnidosFil: Buda, Guadalupe. Bitgenia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Biología Celular e Histología; ArgentinaFil: Marti, Marcelo Adrian. Bitgenia; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Biología Celular e Histología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Larralde, Margarita. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Ramos Mejía"; ArgentinaFil: Boisson, Bertrand. L'institut Des Maladies Génétiques Imagine; Francia. The Rockefeller University; Estados Unidos. Universite de Paris; FranciaFil: Feito Rodriguez, Marta. Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de la Paz.; EspañaFil: Qiu, Xueer. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados UnidosFil: Chrabieh, Maya. L'institut Des Maladies Génétiques Imagine; FranciaFil: Al Ayed, Mohammed. Najran University; Arabia SauditaFil: Al Muhsen, Saleh. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Desai, Jigar V.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Ferre, Elise M.N.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Rosenzweig, Sergio D.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Amador-Borrero, Blanca. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados UnidosFil: Bravo-Gallego, Luz Yadira. Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de la Paz.; EspañaFil: Olmer, Ruth. Hannover Medical School; Alemania. German Center for Lung Research; AlemaniaFil: Merkert, Sylvia. Hannover Medical School; Alemania. German Center for Lung Research; AlemaniaFil: Bret, Montserrat. Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de la Paz.; EspañaFil: Sood, Amika K.. University of North Carolina; Estados UnidosFil: Al-rabiaah, Abdulkarim. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Temsah, Mohamad Hani. King Saud University; Arabia SauditaFil: Halwani, Rabih. University of Sharjah; Emiratos Arabes UnidosFil: Hernandez, Michelle Marilyn. University of North Carolina; Estados UnidosFil: Pessler, Frank. Twincore; Alemania. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research; AlemaniaFil: Casanova, Jean Laurent. The Rockefeller University; Estados Unidos. Necker Hospital for Sick Children; Francia. Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Estados Unidos. Universite de Paris; FranciaFil: Bustamante, Jacinta. The Rockefeller University; Estados Unidos. Necker Hospital for Sick Children; Francia. Universite de Paris; FranciaFil: Lionakis, Michail S.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Bogunovic, Dusan. Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai; Estados Unido

RLIP76, a Glutathione-Conjugate Transporter, Plays a Major Role in the Pathogenesis of Metabolic Syndrome

PURPOSE: Characteristic hypoglycemia, hypotriglyceridemia, hypocholesterolemia, lower body mass, and fat as well as pronounced insulin-sensitivity of RLIP76⁻/⁻ mice suggested to us the possibility that elevation of RLIP76 in response to stress could itself elicit metabolic syndrome (MSy). Indeed, if it were required for MSy, drugs used to treat MSy should have no effect on RLIP76⁻/⁻ mice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood glucose (BG) and lipid measurements were performed in RLIP76⁺/⁺ and RLIP76⁻/⁻ mice, using Ascensia Elite Glucometer® for glucose and ID Labs kits for cholesterol and triglycerides assays. The ultimate effectors of gluconeogenesis are the three enzymes: PEPCK, F-1,6-BPase, and G6Pase, and their expression is regulated by PPARγ and AMPK. The activity of these enzymes was tested by protocols standardized by us. Expressions of RLIP76, PPARα, PPARγ, HMGCR, pJNK, pAkt, and AMPK were performed by Western-blot and tissue staining. RESULTS: The concomitant activation of AMPK and PPARγ by inhibiting transport activity of RLIP76, despite inhibited activity of key glucocorticoid-regulated hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes like PEPCK, G6Pase and F-1,6-BP in RLIP76⁻/⁻ mice, is a salient finding of our studies. The decrease in RLIP76 protein expression by rosiglitazone and metformin is associated with an up-regulation of PPARγ and AMPK. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All four drugs, rosiglitazone, metformin, gemfibrozil and atorvastatin failed to affect glucose and lipid metabolism in RLIP76⁻/⁻ mice. Studies confirmed a model in which RLIP76 plays a central role in the pathogenesis of MSy and RLIP76 loss causes profound and global alterations of MSy signaling functions. RLIP76 is a novel target for single-molecule therapeutics for metabolic syndrome