85 research outputs found

    Pharmacogenetic profiling and cetuximab outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We analyzed the influence of 8 germinal polymorphisms of candidate genes potentially related to EGFR signalling (<it>EGFR</it>, <it>EGF</it>, <it>CCND1</it>) or antibody-directed cell cytotoxicity (<it>FCGR2A </it>and <it>FCGR3A</it>) on outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving cetuximab-based therapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fifty-eight advanced CRC patients treated with cetuximab-irinotecan salvage therapy between 2001 and 2007 were analyzed (mean age 60; 50 PS 0-1). The following polymorphisms were analyzed on blood DNA: <it>EGFR </it>(CA repeats in intron 1, -216 G > T, -191C > A, R497K), <it>EGF </it>(A61G), <it>CCND1 </it>(A870G), <it>FCGR2A </it>(R131H), <it>FCGR3A </it>(F158V). Statistical analyses were conducted on the total population and on patients with wt KRas tumors. All SNPs were considered as ternary variables (wt/wt <it>vs </it>wt/mut <it>vs </it>mut/mut), with the exception of -191C > A <it>EGFR </it>polymorphism (AA patient merged with CA patients).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Analysis of skin toxicity as a function of EGFR intron 1 polymorphism showed a tendency for higher toxicity in patients with a low number of CA-repeats (p = 0.058). <it>CCND1 </it>A870G polymorphism was significantly related to clinical response, both in the entire population and in KRas wt patients, with the G allele being associated with a lack of response. In wt KRas patients, time to progression (TTP) was significantly related to <it>EGFR </it>-191C > A polymorphism with a longer TTP in CC patients as compared to others, and to <it>CCND1 </it>A870G polymorphism with the G allele being associated with a shorter TTP; a multivariate analysis including these two polymorphisms only retained <it>CCND1 </it>polymorphism. Overall survival was significantly related to <it>CCND1 </it>polymorphism with a shorter survival in patients bearing the G allele, and to <it>FCGR3A </it>F158V polymorphism with a shorter survival in VV patients (in the entire population and in KRas wt patients). <it>FCGR3A </it>F158V and <it>CCND1 </it>A870G polymorphisms were significant independent predictors of overall survival.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Present original data obtained in wt KRas patients corresponding to the current cetuximab-treated population clearly suggest that <it>CCND1 </it>A870G polymorphism may be used as an additional marker for predicting cetuximab efficacy, TTP and overall survival. In addition, <it>FCGR3A </it>F158V polymorphism was a significant independent predictor of overall survival.</p

    Patterns of illness in travelers visiting Mexico and Central America: the GeoSentinel experience

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: Mexico and Central America are important travel destinations for North American and European travelers. There is limited information on regional differences in travel related morbidity. METHODS: We describe the morbidity among 4779 ill travelers returned from Mexico and Central America who were evaluated at GeoSentinel network clinics during December 1996 to February 2010. RESULTS: The most frequent presenting syndromes included acute and chronic diarrhea, dermatologic diseases, febrile systemic illness, and respiratory disease. A higher proportion of ill travelers from the United States had acute diarrhea, compared with their Canadian and European counterparts (odds ratio, 1.9; P < .0001). During the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak from March 2009 through February 2010, the proportionate morbidity (PM) associated with respiratory illnesses in ill travelers increased among those returned from Mexico, compared with prior years (196.0 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers vs 53.7 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers; P < .0001); the PM remained constant in the rest of Central America (57.3 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers). We identified 50 travelers returned from Mexico and Central America who developed influenza, including infection due to 2009 H1N1 strains and influenza-like illness. The overall risk of malaria was low; only 4 cases of malaria were acquired in Mexico (PM, 2.2 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) in 13 years, compared with 18 from Honduras (PM, 79.6 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) and 14 from Guatemala (PM, 34.4 cases per 1000 ill returned travelers) during the same period. Plasmodium vivax malaria was the most frequent malaria diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Travel medicine practitioners advising and treating travelers visiting these regions should dedicate special attention to vaccine-preventable illnesses and should consider the uncommon occurrence of acute hepatitis A, leptospirosis, neurocysticercosis, acute Chagas disease, onchocerciasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, neurocysticercosis, HIV, malaria, and brucellosis
    corecore