Machine Learning for QoS Prediction in Vehicular Communication: Challenges and Solution Approaches

As cellular networks evolve towards the 6th generation, machine learning is seen as a key enabling technology to improve the capabilities of the network. Machine learning provides a methodology for predictive systems, which can make networks become proactive. This proactive behavior of the network can be leveraged to sustain, for example, a specific quality of service requirement. With predictive quality of service, a wide variety of new use cases, both safety- and entertainment-related, are emerging, especially in the automotive sector. Therefore, in this work, we consider maximum throughput prediction enhancing, for example, streaming or high-definition mapping applications. We discuss the entire machine learning workflow highlighting less regarded aspects such as the detailed sampling procedures, the in-depth analysis of the dataset characteristics, the effects of splits in the provided results, and the data availability. Reliable machine learning models need to face a lot of challenges during their lifecycle. We highlight how confidence can be built on machine learning technologies by better understanding the underlying characteristics of the collected data. We discuss feature engineering and the effects of different splits for the training processes, showcasing that random splits might overestimate performance by more than twofold. Moreover, we investigate diverse sets of input features, where network information proved to be most effective, cutting the error by half. Part of our contribution is the validation of multiple machine learning models within diverse scenarios. We also use explainable AI to show that machine learning can learn underlying principles of wireless networks without being explicitly programmed. Our data is collected from a deployed network that was under full control of the measurement team and covered different vehicular scenarios and radio environments.Comment: 18 pages, 12 Figures. Accepted on IEEE Acces

Towards an AI-enabled Connected Industry: AGV Communication and Sensor Measurement Datasets

This paper presents two wireless measurement campaigns in industrial testbeds: industrial Vehicle-to-vehicle (iV2V) and industrial Vehicle-to-infrastructure plus Sensor (iV2I+), together with detailed information about the two captured datasets. iV2V covers sidelink communication scenarios between Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), while iV2I+ is conducted at an industrial setting where an autonomous cleaning robot is connected to a private cellular network. The combination of different communication technologies within a common measurement methodology provides insights that can be exploited by Machine Learning (ML) for tasks such as fingerprinting, line-of-sight detection, prediction of quality of service or link selection. Moreover, the datasets are publicly available, labelled and prefiltered for fast on-boarding and applicability.Comment: 7 pages, 3 figures. Submitted to a magazine. Datasets available at https://ieee-dataport.org/open-access/ai4mobile-industrial-wireless-datasets-iv2v-and-iv2

Berlin V2X: A Machine Learning Dataset from Multiple Vehicles and Radio Access Technologies

The evolution of wireless communications into 6G and beyond is expected to rely on new machine learning (ML)-based capabilities. These can enable proactive decisions and actions from wireless-network components to sustain quality-of-service (QoS) and user experience. Moreover, new use cases in the area of vehicular and industrial communications will emerge. Specifically in the area of vehicle communication, vehicle-to-everything (V2X) schemes will benefit strongly from such advances. With this in mind, we have conducted a detailed measurement campaign that paves the way to a plethora of diverse ML-based studies. The resulting datasets offer GPS-located wireless measurements across diverse urban environments for both cellular (with two different operators) and sidelink radio access technologies, thus enabling a variety of different studies towards V2X. The datasets are labeled and sampled with a high time resolution. Furthermore, we make the data publicly available with all the necessary information to support the onboarding of new researchers. We provide an initial analysis of the data showing some of the challenges that ML needs to overcome and the features that ML can leverage, as well as some hints at potential research studies.Comment: 5 pages, 6 figures. Accepted for presentation at IEEE conference VTC2023-Spring. Available dataset at https://ieee-dataport.org/open-access/berlin-v2

Squalene Synthase Deficiency: Clinical, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterization of a Defect in Cholesterol Biosynthesis

Item does not contain fulltex

Target-Site Investigation for the Plasma Prolactin Response: Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Risperidone and Paliperidone in the Rat

To understand the drivers in the biological system response to dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, a mechanistic semiphysiologically based (PB) pharmacokinetic-pharmacodymanic (PKPD) model was developed to describe prolactin responses to risperidone (RIS) and its active metabolite paliperidone (PAL). We performed a microdialysis study in rats to obtain detailed plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of PAL and RIS. To assess the impact of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) functioning on brain distribution, we performed experiments in the absence or presence of the P-gp inhibitor tariquidar (TQD). PK and PKPD modeling was performed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Plasma, brain ECF, and CSF PK values of RIS and PAL were well described by a 12-compartmental semi-PBPK model, including metabolic conversion of RIS to PAL. P-gp efflux functionality was identified on brain ECF for RIS and PAL and on CSF only for PAL. In the PKPD analysis, the plasma drug concentrations were more relevant than brain ECF or CSF concentrations to explain the prolactin response; the estimated EC50 was in accordance with reports in the literature for both RIS and PAL. We conclude that for RIS and PAL, the plasma concentrations better explain the prolactin response than do brain ECF or CSF concentrations. This research shows that PKPD modeling is of high value to delineate the target site of drugs.Pharmacolog