22 research outputs found
Effectiveness of an intervention to facilitate prompt referral to memory clinics in the United Kingdom: Cluster randomised controlled trial
Background
Most people with dementia do not receive timely diagnosis, preventing them from making informed plans about their future and accessing services. Many countries have a policy to increase timely diagnosis, but trials aimed at changing general practitioner (GP) practice have been unsuccessful. We aimed to assess whether a GP’s personal letter, with an evidence-based leaflet about overcoming barriers to accessing help for memory problems—aimed at empowering patients and families—increases timely dementia diagnosis and patient presentation to general practice.
Methods and finding
Multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial with raters masked to an online computer-generated randomisation system assessing 1 y outcome. We recruited 22 general practices (August 2013–September 2014) and 13 corresponding secondary care memory services in London, Hertfordshire, and Essex, United Kingdom. Eligible patients were aged ≥70 y, without a known diagnosis of dementia, living in their own homes. There were 6,387 such patients in 11 intervention practices and 8,171 in the control practices. The primary outcome was cognitive severity on Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Main secondary outcomes were proportion of patients consulting their GP with suspected memory disorders and proportion of those referred to memory clinics. There was no between-group difference in cognitive severity at diagnosis (99 intervention, mean MMSE = 22.04, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 20.95 to 23.13; 124 control, mean MMSE = 22.59, 95% CI = 21.58 to 23.6; p = 0.48). GP consultations with patients with suspected memory disorders increased in intervention versus control group (odds ratio = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.28, 1.54). There was no between-group difference in the proportions of patients referred to memory clinics (166, 2.5%; 220, 2.7%; p = .077 respectively). The study was limited as we do not know whether the additional patients presenting to GPs had objective as well as subjective memory problems and therefore should have been referred. In addition, we aimed to empower patients but did not do anything to change GP practice.
Conclusions
Our intervention to access timely dementia diagnosis resulted in more patients presenting to GPs with memory problems, but no diagnoses increase. We are uncertain as to the reason for this and do not know whether empowering the public and targeting GPs would have resulted in a successful intervention. Future interventions should be targeted at both patients and GPs.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN1921687
Recommended from our members
Remaking the Pitch: Reuse Strategies in Entrepreneurs' Pitch Decks
Examination of how Korean entrepreneurs in an entrepreneurship program revised their English-language slide decks for their competitive presentations (“pitches”) by reusing content from professional communication genres, including their own documents and feedback from potential stakeholders in their target markets. Research question: As entrepreneurs learn to pitch ideas to unfamiliar markets, how do they revise their slide decks by reusing content from other professional communication genres? Specifically, what strategies do they follow when reusing content? Literature review: The professional communication literature demonstrates that reuse tends to take place in documentation cycles where documents are set in interaction with each other and that reuse itself involves rhetorical choices. Yet such reuse strategies have not been examined in existing studies of entrepreneurial pitches in marketing and technology commercialization. Methodology: In an exploratory qualitative study, researchers textually analyzed 14 sets of five related document genres in the archives of an entrepreneurship program. These genres represented a full cycle of activity: application to the program, initial pitches, initial feedback from program personnel, detailed feedback from representative stakeholders in the target market, and revised pitches. Interviews and surveys of program personnel further contextualize the data. Results and conclusions: Entrepreneurs reused content from professional communication genres, including those that they had generated as well as those generated by market stakeholders. However, reuse went simply beyond accepting and copying feedback; as they learned to make their pitch arguments, these entrepreneurs had to weigh this feedback and engage with it critically. This reuse can be characterized as Accepting (repeating verbatim or in close paraphrase); Continuing (extending lines of argument); and Resisting (rebutting lines of argument). These findings suggest that entrepreneurs need all three strategies as they refine their pitches for their target markets.IC2 Institut
Making the Pitch: Examining Dialogue and Revisions in Entrepreneurs’ Pitch Decks
The question: How Korean entrepreneurs in an entrepreneurship program revised
their slide decks for their presentations (“pitches”) in response to professional communication genres representing
feedback from potential stakeholders in their target markets is examined. Research questions: As entrepreneurs
learn to pitch ideas to unfamiliar markets, how do they revise their slide decks for their pitches when interacting with
other professional communication genres that represent the concerns of market stakeholders? Specifically, what
changes do entrepreneurs make to the claims, evidence, and complexity of arguments in their pitches? Literature
review: The professional communication literature demonstrates that the revision process tends to take place in
documentation cycles where documents are set in interaction with each other. Yet such revision processes are not
studied in detail in existing studies of entrepreneurial pitches in marketing and technology commercialization.
Methodology: In this exploratory qualitative study, researchers textually analyzed 14 sets of five related document
genres in the archives of an entrepreneurship program. These genres represented a full cycle of activity: application
to the program, initial pitches, initial feedback from program personnel, detailed feedback from representative
stakeholders in the target market, and revised pitches. Interviews and surveys of program personnel further
contextualize the data. Results and conclusions: Entrepreneurs revised their claims and evidence based on their
dialogue with their target market. Some of the entrepreneurs altered their slides to make more complex arguments
rebutting stakeholders’ concerns. These findings suggest that entrepreneurs engage in dialogue with their target
markets, but their engagement tends to be guided by tacit, situated experience rather than through an explicit,
systematized approach.Writin
How Do Entrepreneurs Hone Their Pitches?: Analyzing How Pitch Presentations Develop in a Technology Commercialization Competition
Technology innovators must pitch their technology and its business value to potential buyers, partners, and distributors: to make claims that will create interest in the appropriate audiences and offer evidence that those audiences recognize as credible and applicable. Such pitches typically involve a spoken presentation and a slide deck, both of which must persuade stakeholders. The pitch represents a rhetorically complex argument backed by many interconnected genres.
The authors examine how innovators in an entrepreneurship development program, structured as a competition, developed pitches in response to feedback. They examine pitch changes in terms of overall structure, individual claims and evidence, and engagement tactics. Their findings suggest that presenters found this task of adjusting their pitches to be difficult, partly because the training program's current feedback does not separate out these different aspects. They recommend developing a heuristic to better structure arguments.IC2 Institut