Charité Caesarean Birth Improves Birth Experience in Planned and Unplanned Caesarean Sections While Maintaining Maternal and Neonatal Safety: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of a modified caesarean delivery (Charite caesarean birth) in an extended frame of indications, and to examine its impact on parents' birth experience and long-term effects. Methods: This prospective cohort study was performed from January to June 2019. A standardized questionnaire was given to all women who gave birth as an inpatient delivery. Eight months after hospital discharge, all women who gave consent were sent a follow-up questionnaire including questions on current feelings, breast feeding, bonding, and support system, as well as a screening for postnatal depression. Indications for caesarean delivery included preterm birth, fetal malpresentation, fetal malformation, twin pregnancy, and maternal pre-existing conditions. Results: The study cohort included 110 women. The mode of delivery was spontaneous in 49%, per vacuum extraction in 15%, conventional caesarean section in 7%, and Charite caesarean birth in 29%. The groups with Charite versus conventional caesarean delivery did not significantly differ in neonatal admission rates, umbilical cord parameters, maternal blood loss, or duration of surgery. Compared to conventional caesarean delivery, women who underwent a Charite caesarean delivery were significantly more satisfied with their birth experience. At follow-up, the mode of delivery was not associated with significant differences in postnatal depression, breast feeding, or bonding parameters. Conclusions: Outside of emergency situations, Charite caesarean birth improves patients' well-being, without increased maternal and neonatal morbidity

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: an evaluation of obstetric management in German maternity units

Purpose Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcome. Evidence for improvement by obstetric management is sparse. Common international guidelines recommend induction of labor before term, however, they differ in recommendations of monitoring the disease and time point of active management. So far, an official guideline for treatment and management of ICP in Germany does not exist. This study aims to compile common practice and policy in obstetric management of ICP in German maternity units. The objective is to gather obstetricians' opinion on management of ICP, and to estimate the need for standardization of current practice in Germany on the background of existing evidence. Conclusions Opinions on the management of ICP in German maternity units differ widely and partly deviate by large from international standards. Reasons for this may be the lack of a national guideline and the low awareness due to the rarity of the disease on the one hand and the very slow dynamics in evidence generation and thus the uncertainty about the actual risks and optimal management on the other. The present data highlight the need for further research and clinical guidelines to standardize and optimize treatment based on the best available evidence

3D ultrasound as a surgical quality control of conization in patients with severe dysplasia: a prospective study

Purpose: To compare the techniques for cone measurement with ultrasound to determine the size of the resected tissue and to evaluate parameters which may be relevant for stratifying women at risk who need surveillance when pregnant. Methods: The present study included women with a pathological cervical biopsy. Cervical length and volume were determined by transvaginal ultrasound prior to conization. The pathologist measured the volume of the removed tissue by the fluid displacement technique and using a ruler. A repeat transvaginal ultrasound was performed during a follow-up visit. Factors affecting cone volume as well as the correlation between measurement techniques were analyzed. Results: A total of 28 patients underwent cervical excision treatment. The mean cervical volumes measured sonographically before and after the operation were 17.72 ± 7.34 and 13.21 ± 5.43 cm3, respectively. The proportion of volume excised was 25.50 ± 17.43%. A significant correlation was found between the cone depth and the cone volume measured by the fluid displacement technique, and histopathologically and sonographically measured difference in cervical volume. The interobserver reliability coefficient was > 0.9. Analyzing influential parameters, only age affected the extent of cone volume and the correlation between the three measurement techniques. Conclusion: Commonly applied techniques of cervical and cone measurement are equivalent and interchangeable. Our ultrasound data show variety in the volume and length of the cervix, and in the proportion of the volume excised at conization. Ultrasound measurements may help the surgeon to estimate not only the dimension of the remaining cervix but also its function

Performance of OncoE6 cervical test with collection methods enabling self-sampling

Abstract Background The paradigm shift from cytological screening to Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening for cervical cancer allows the introduction of new technologies in sample collection and diagnostics. The OncoE6™ Cervical Test (OncoE6 Test) is a rapid, easy-to-use lateral flow method detecting HPV16/18 E6 oncoproteins that has proven to detect high-grade cervical lesions with high specificity. If compatible with self-collection samples, this technology might allow for decentralized screening of hard-to-reach populations. Methods For technical validation, cervicovaginal lavages were collected from 20 patients with confirmed HPV16+ or HPV18+ invasive cervical cancer. Cervical smears were collected by polyester-tipped swabs and cytobrushes. All samples were applied to the OncoE6 Test and cytobrush samples additionally genotyped. Results Lavage, swab, and cytobrush revealed concordant outcome in 18/20 samples. HPV types corresponded with the HPV genotyping by GP5+/6+ PCR analyses. Due to a rare mutation found in the E6 antibody binding site one sample was not detected, another sample had very low cellularity. Conclusions Overall, vaginal lavages are technically adequate for the OncoE6 Test. Combining self-sampling with oncoprotein rapid testing to detect women with highest risk for severe dysplasia or cancer may allow for secondary cancer prevention in settings where other screening modalities were unsuccessful to date