24 research outputs found

    Craniodental Affinities of Southeast Asia\u27s Negritos and the Concordance with Their Genetic Affinities

    Get PDF
    Genetic research into Southeast Asia\u27s negritos has revealed their deep-rooted ancestry, with time depth comparable to that of Southwest Pacific populations. This finding is often interpreted as evidence that negritos, in contrast to other Southeast Asians, can trace much of their ancestry directly back to the early dispersal of Homo sapiens in the order of 70 kya from Africa to Pleistocene New Guinea and Australia. One view on negritos is to lump them and Southwest Pacific peoples into an Australoid race whose geographic distribution had included Southeast Asia prior to the Neolithic incursion of Mongoloid farmers. Studies into Semang osteology have revealed some hints of Southwest Pacific affinities in cranial shape, dental morphology, and dental metrical shape. On the other hand, the Andamanese have been shown to resemble Africans in their craniometrics and South Asians in their dental morphology, while Philippine negritos resemble Mongoloid Southeast Asians in these respects and also in their dental metrics. This study expands the scope of negrito cranial comparisons by including Melayu Malays and additional coverage of South Asians. It highlights the distinction between the Mongoloid-like Philippine negritos and the Andamanese and Semang (and Senoi of Malaya) with their non-Mongoloid associations. It proposes that the early/mid-Holocene dispersal of the B4a1a mitochondrial DNA clade across Borneo, the Philippines, and Taiwan may be important for understanding the distinction between Philippine and other negritos

    Les ossements humains de la grotte de Tabon (Palawan, Philippines) : RĂ©partition spatiale et Ă©tude d’une collection d’ossements inĂ©dite

    No full text
    La renommĂ©e de la grotte de Tabon provient de la dĂ©couverte dans les annĂ©es 1960 de 3 fossiles d’Homo sapiens datant de la fin du PlĂ©istocĂšne supĂ©rieur. En dĂ©pit de leur importance, aucune publication n’a jamais dĂ©crit le contexte de dĂ©couverte de ces ossements ni des centaines d’autres restes humains mis au jour. A partir de la redĂ©couverte rĂ©cente de documents d’archive crĂ©Ă©s au moment des fouilles et d’une collection de 204 ossements humains dans les rĂ©serves du National Museum of the Philippines, nous avons crĂ©Ă© un systĂšme d’information gĂ©ographique permettant d’étudier la rĂ©partition spatiale de l’ensemble du matĂ©riel mis au jour dans les annĂ©es 1960 et d’en dĂ©duire le contexte de dĂ©couverte de l’ensemble des restes humains. Cette Ă©tude a permis de relocaliser la dĂ©couverte de 2 des 3 fossiles cĂ©lĂšbres et de repĂ©rer des ossements humains anciens supplĂ©mentaires mis au jour en association avec une industrie lithique datĂ©e d’environ 20000 BP. Par ailleurs, une sĂ©lection de 14 ossements potentiellement anciens (PlĂ©istocĂšne ?) a Ă©tĂ© rĂ©alisĂ©e en combinant l’analyse de la rĂ©partition spatiale avec l’état de conservation des ossements. S’ils sont confirmĂ©s, ces rĂ©sultats permettraient d’augmenter drastiquement le nombre d’ossements humains prĂ©- HolocĂšne connus en Asie du Sud-Est insulaire

    Homo sapiens

    No full text
    International audiencenon communiqu

    Genomic and cranial phenotype data support multiple modern human dispersals from Africa and a Southern route into Asia.

    No full text
    Despite broad consensus on Africa as the main place of origin for anatomically modern humans, their dispersal pattern out of the continent continues to be intensely debated. In extant human populations, the observation of decreasing genetic and phenotypic diversity at increasing distances from sub-Saharan Africa has been interpreted as evidence for a single dispersal, accompanied by a series of founder effects. In such a scenario, modern human genetic and phenotypic variation was primarily generated through successive population bottlenecks and drift during a rapid worldwide expansion out of Africa in the Late Pleistocene. However, recent genetic studies, as well as accumulating archaeological and paleoanthropological evidence, challenge this parsimonious model. They suggest instead a “southern route” dispersal into Asia as early as the late Middle Pleistocene, followed by a separate dispersal into northern Eurasia. Here we test these competing out-of-Africa scenarios by modeling hypothetical geographical migration routes and assessing their correlation with neutral population differentiation, as measured by genetic polymorphisms and cranial shape variables of modern human populations from Africa and Asia. We show that both lines of evidence support amultiple-dispersals model in which Austro-Melanesian populations are relatively isolated descendants of an early dispersal, whereas other Asian populations are descended from, or highly admixed with, members of a subsequent migration event

    Genomic and cranial phenotype data support multiple modern human dispersals from Africa and a southern route into Asia

    No full text
    International audienc
    corecore