5 research outputs found

    Concordance between SIVA, IVAN, and VAMPIRE software tools for semi-automated analysis of retinal vessel caliber

    Get PDF
    We aimed to compare measurements from three of the most widely used software packages in the literature and to generate conversion algorithms for measurement of the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) between SIVA and IVAN and between SIVA and VAMPIRE. We analyzed 223 retinal photographs from 133 human participants using both SIVA, VAMPIRE and IVAN independently for computing CRAE and CRVE. Agreement between measurements was assessed using Bland–Altman plots and intra-class correlation coefficients. A conversion algorithm between measurements was carried out using linear regression, and validated using bootstrapping and root-mean-square error. The agreement between VAMPIRE and IVAN was poor to moderate: The mean difference was 20.2 ”m (95% limits of agreement, LOA, −12.2–52.6 ”m) for CRAE and 21.0 ”m (95% LOA, −17.5–59.5 ”m) for CRVE. The agreement between VAMPIRE and SIVA was also poor to moderate: the mean difference was 36.6 ”m (95% LOA, −12.8–60.4 ”m) for CRAE, and 40.3 ”m (95% LOA, 5.6–75.0 ”m) for CRVE. The agreement between IVAN and SIVA was good to excellent: the mean difference was 16.4 ”m (95% LOA, −4.25–37.0 ”m) for CRAE, and 19.3 ”m (95% LOA, 0.09–38.6 ”m) for CRVE. We propose an algorithm converting IVAN and VAMPIRE measurements into SIVA-estimated measurements, which could be used to homogenize sets of vessel measurements obtained with different software packages

    Metabolic Adaptation of Ralstonia solanacearum during Plant Infection: A Methionine Biosynthesis Case Study

    Get PDF
    MetE and MetH are two distinct enzymes that catalyze a similar biochemical reaction during the last step of methionine biosynthesis, MetH being a cobalamin-dependent enzyme whereas MetE activity is cobalamin-independent. In this work, we show that the last step of methionine synthesis in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum is under the transcriptional control of the master pathogenicity regulator HrpG. This control is exerted essentially on metE expression through the intermediate regulator MetR. Expression of metE is strongly and specifically induced in the presence of plant cells in a hrpG- and metR-dependent manner. metE and metR mutants are not auxotrophic for methionine and not affected for growth inside the plant but produce significantly reduced disease symptoms on tomato whereas disruption of metH has no impact on pathogenicity. The finding that the pathogen preferentially induces metE expression rather than metH in the presence of plant cells is indicative of a probable metabolic adaptation to physiological host conditions since this induction of metE occurs in an environment in which cobalamin, the required co-factor for MetH, is absent. It also shows that MetE and MetH are not functionally redundant and are deployed during specific stages of the bacteria lifecycle, the expression of metE and metH being controlled by multiple and distinct signals

    Guide pour la mise en oeuvre de la gouvernance en appui au développement durable des territoires

    No full text
    Les multiples rĂ©formes des collectivitĂ©s et des politiques publiques, associĂ©es Ă  la croissance des pratiques participatives, induisent une complexitĂ© croissante des processus de dĂ©veloppement territorial. Celle-ci interroge les modalitĂ©s d'accompagnement de la gouvernance territoriale pour qu'elle ne soit ni un mythe, ni une figure rhĂ©torique, mais un outil d'intelligence territoriale en faveur d'un dĂ©veloppement partagĂ© et harmonieux des territoires. Ces Ă©volutions gĂ©nĂšrent d'importants besoins d'adaptation auxquels ce guide tente de rĂ©pondre en tant qu'"outil" facilitant l'apprentissage et stimulant la rĂ©flexivitĂ©. Il constitue en effet un "outil" de rĂ©flexivitĂ© et d'accompagnement pour la mise en oeuvre d'actions en appui Ă  la gouvernance territoriale. En cela, il contribue Ă  l'ingĂ©nierie de la gouvernance territoriale dĂ©finie comme "l'ensemble des mĂ©thodes et outils permettant la coordination, la participation et l'apprentissage des acteurs ainsi que le pilotage des projets de territoires". Cette ingĂ©nierie de la gouvernance intĂšgre ainsi une partie de l'ingĂ©nierie territoriale. L'ensemble des dimensions de la gouvernance est abordĂ©, et pas uniquement ses aspects relatifs Ă  la participation ou la concertation auxquels la gouvernance a trop souvent tendance Ă  ĂȘtre assimilĂ©e et pour lesquels il existe dĂ©jĂ  de nombreux guides
    corecore