Prevalence of pulp and periapical diseases in the endodontic postgraduate program at the national autonomous University of Mexico 2014-2019

Investigations on the prevalence of pulp and periradicular diseases in Mexican population produced few studies, conducted to specific age population. Considering the importance of epidemiological investigation.The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of pulp and periapical pathologies and their distribution according to sex, age, affected teeth, and etiological factors found in patients the DEPeI, FO, UNAM Endodontic Postgraduate Program during the period 2014–2019.The data collected were from the records of the Single Clinical File of patients treated at the Endodontic Specialization Clinic, DEPeI, FO, UNAM, period 2014–2019. The following variables were recorded for each endodontic file: diagnosed pulp and periapical pathology, sex, age, affected tooth, and etiological factor. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed with 95% CI (Confidence intervals).Of all the registers reviewed, irreversible pulpitis (34.58%) and chronic apical periodontitis (34.89%) proved to be the most prevalent pulp and periapical pathologies, respectively. The female sex predominated (65.36%). The age group that requested the most endodontic treatment, according to the records reviewed, was 60 or older (36.99%). The most treated teeth were the upper first molars (24.15%) and lower (36.71%), and the most prevalent etiological factor was dental caries (84.07%).Irreversible pulpitis and chronic apical periodontitis were the most prevalent pathologies. The predominant sex was female, and the age group was 60 years or older. The first upper and lower molars were the most endodontically treated teeth. The most prevalent etiological factor was dental caries

Oral health status in older adults with social security in Mexico City:latent class analysis

Objective: To explore the oral health status through a latent class analysis in elderly social security beneficiaries from Southwest Mexico City. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study of beneficiaries of the State Employee Social Security and Social Services Institute (ISSSTE, in Spanish) and the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS, in Spanish) aged 60 years or older. Oral health conditions such as edentulism, coronal and root caries (DMFT and DFT . 75 percentile), clinical attachment loss (. 4 mm), and healthy teeth (. 25 percentile) were determined. A latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to classify the oral health status of dentate patients. Results: In total, 336 patients were included (47.9% from the ISSSTE and 52.1% from the IMSS), with an average age of 74.4 (SD = 7.1) years. The 75th percentile of the DMFT = 23 and of the DFT = 2. Of the patients, 77.9% had periodontal disease. The 25th percentile of healthy teeth = 4. A three class model is adequate, with a high classification quality (Entropy = 0.915). The patients were classified as 'gEdentulous'h (15.2%), 'gClass 1 = Unfavorable'h (13.7%), 'gClass 2 = Somewhat favorable'h (10.4%), and 'gClass 3 = Favorable'h (60.7%). Using 'gClass 3 = Favorable'h as a reference, there was an association (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.8-6.4) between being edentulous and being 75 years of age and over, compared with the 60- to 74-year age group. Conclusion: The oral health in elderly social security beneficiaries is not optimal. The probability of becoming edentulous increases with age. A three-class model appropriately classifies the oral health dimensions in the elderly population

A novel scoring system to measure radiographic abnormalities and related spirometric values in cured pulmonary tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite chemotherapy, patients with cured pulmonary tuberculosis may result in lung functional impairment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel scoring system based on the degree of radiographic abnormalities and related spirometric values in patients with cured pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: One hundred and twenty seven patients with cured pulmonary tuberculosis were prospectively enrolled in a referral hospital specializing in respiratory diseases. Spirometry was performed and the extent of radiographic abnormalities was evaluated twice by each of two readers to generate a novel quantitative score. Scoring reproducibility was analyzed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman method. Multiple linear regression models were performed to assess the association of the extent of radiographic abnormalities with spirometric values. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement for scoring of radiographic abnormalities (SRA) showed an ICC of 0.81 (CI:95%, 0.67-0.95) and 0.78 (CI:95%, 0.65-0.92), for reader 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-observer reproducibility for the first measurement was 0.83 (CI:95%, 0.71-0.95), and for the second measurement was 0.74 (CI:95%, 0.58-0.90). The Bland-Altman analysis of the intra-observer agreement showed a mean bias of 0.87% and -0.55% and an inter-observer agreement of -0.35% and -1.78%, indicating a minor average systematic variability. After adjustment for age, gender, height, smoking status, pack-years of smoking, and degree of dyspnea, the scoring degree of radiographic abnormalities was significantly and negatively associated with absolute and percent predicted values of FVC: -0.07 (CI:95%, -0.01 to -0.04); -2.48 (CI:95%, -3.45 to -1.50); and FEV1 -0.07 (CI:95%, -0.10 to -0.05); -2.92 (CI:95%, -3.87 to -1.97) respectively, in the patients studied. CONCLUSION: The extent of radiographic abnormalities, as evaluated through our novel scoring system, was inversely associated with spirometric values, and exhibited good reliability and reproducibility. As intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of the SRA varied from good to excellent, the use of SRA in this setting appears acceptable

Association of absolute values and percentage of predicted of forced vital capacity (FVC) (A, B); for whom forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) (C, D) with the score of degree of radiographic abnormalities.

<p>(FEV₁).</p

Bland-Altman plot of measurement differences against measurements average with a 95% limit of agreement superimposed for pair-wise comparisons of scoring of radiographic abnormalities (SRA), for intra-observer agreement: A) between reader one for the first and second measurements, B) between reader two for the first and second measurements.

<p>Bland-Altman plot of measurement differences against measurements average with a 95% limit of agreement superimposed for pair-wise comparisons of scoring of radiographic abnormalities (SRA), for intra-observer agreement: A) between reader one for the first and second measurements, B) between reader two for the first and second measurements.</p