23 research outputs found
LI-RADS: A Conceptual and Historical Review from Its Beginning to Its Recent Integration into AASLD Clinical Practice Guidance
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology, technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection of liver observations in individuals at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS is supported and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Upon its initial release in 2011, LI-RADS applied only to liver observations identified at CT or MRI. It has since been refined and expanded over multiple updates to now also address ultrasound-based surveillance, contrast-enhanced ultrasound for HCC diagnosis, and CT/MRI for assessing treatment response after locoregional therapy. The LI-RADS 2018 version was integrated into the HCC diagnosis, staging, and management practice guidance of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). This article reviews the major LI-RADS updates since its 2011 inception and provides an overview of the currently published LI-RADS algorithms
Recommended from our members
A multicenter assessment of interreader reliability of LI-RADS version 2018 for MRI and CT
Background: Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement
for Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).
Purpose: To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multi-center, multireader setting using scrollable images.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used de-identified clinical multiphase
CT and MRI examinations and reports with at least one untreated observation from six
institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted.
Examination dates were October 2017 – August 2018 at the coordinating center. One
untreated observation per examination was randomly selected using observation
identifiers, and its clinically assigned features were extracted from the report. The
corresponding LI-RADS v2018 category was computed as a re-scored clinical read. Each
examination was randomly assigned to two of 43 research readers who independently
scored the observation. Agreement for an ordinal modified four-category LI-RADS scale
(LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5/M/tumor in vein) was computed using intra-class correlation
coefficients (ICC). Agreement was also computed for dichotomized malignancy (LR-4/LR5/LR-M/LR-tumor in vein), LR-5, and LR-M. Agreement was compared between researchversus-research reads and research-versus-clinical reads.
Results: 484 patients (mean age, 62 years ±10 [SD]; 156 women; 93 CT, 391 MRI) were
included. ICCs for ordinal LI-RADS, dichotomized malignancy, LR-5, and LR-M were 0.68
(95% CI: 0.62, 0.74), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.71), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.66), and 0.46 (95%
CI: 0.31, 0.61) respectively. Research-versus-research reader agreement was higher
than research-versus-clinical agreement for modified four-category LI-RADS (ICC, 0.68
vs. 0.62, P = .03) and for dichotomized malignancy (ICC, 0.63 vs. 0.53, P = .005), but not
for LR-5 (P = .14) or LR-M (P = .94).
Conclusion: There was moderate agreement for Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data
System v2018 overall. For some comparisons, research-versus-research reader
agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical reader agreement, indicating
differences between the clinical and research environments that warrant further study
Hepatocellular carcinoma imaging systems: why they exist, how they have evolved, and how they differ.
Over the past 16Â years, several scientific organizations have proposed systems that incorporate imaging for surveillance, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and monitoring of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These systems are needed to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of liver imaging examinations; help differentiate benign from malignant observations; improve consistency between radiologists; and provide guidance for management of HCC. This review article discusses the historical evolution of HCC imaging systems. We indicate the features differentiating these systems, including target population, screening and surveillance algorithm, diagnostic imaging modalities, diagnostic scope, expertise and technical requirements, terminology, major and ancillary imaging features, staging and transplant eligibility, and assessment of treatment response. We highlight the potential benefits of unifying the systems, which we anticipate will enable sharing, pooling, and meta-analysis of data; facilitate multi-center trials; and accelerate dissemination of knowledge
Recommended from our members
Hepatocellular carcinoma imaging systems: why they exist, how they have evolved, and how they differ.
Over the past 16Â years, several scientific organizations have proposed systems that incorporate imaging for surveillance, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and monitoring of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These systems are needed to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of liver imaging examinations; help differentiate benign from malignant observations; improve consistency between radiologists; and provide guidance for management of HCC. This review article discusses the historical evolution of HCC imaging systems. We indicate the features differentiating these systems, including target population, screening and surveillance algorithm, diagnostic imaging modalities, diagnostic scope, expertise and technical requirements, terminology, major and ancillary imaging features, staging and transplant eligibility, and assessment of treatment response. We highlight the potential benefits of unifying the systems, which we anticipate will enable sharing, pooling, and meta-analysis of data; facilitate multi-center trials; and accelerate dissemination of knowledge
Recommended from our members
Understanding LI-RADS: a primer for practical use.
The Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardized interpretation and reporting of computed tomography and magnetic resonance examinations performed in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. LI-RADS includes a diagnostic algorithm, lexicon, and atlas as well as suggestions for reporting, management, and imaging techniques. This primer provides an introduction to LI-RADS for radiologists including an explanation of the diagnostic algorithm, descriptions of the categories, and definitions of the major imaging features used to categorize observations with case examples
Understanding LI-RADS: a primer for practical use.
The Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardized interpretation and reporting of computed tomography and magnetic resonance examinations performed in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. LI-RADS includes a diagnostic algorithm, lexicon, and atlas as well as suggestions for reporting, management, and imaging techniques. This primer provides an introduction to LI-RADS for radiologists including an explanation of the diagnostic algorithm, descriptions of the categories, and definitions of the major imaging features used to categorize observations with case examples
Recommended from our members
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Review of Ancillary Imaging Features.
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Review of Ancillary Imaging Features.
The American College of Radiology supported Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardized interpretation and reporting of imaging examinations performed in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As reviewed in the first article of a two-part series, LI-RADS uses 5 major imaging features to categorize LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5 observations. The major features are arterial phase enhancement, washout appearance, capsule appearance, diameter, and threshold growth. In addition to the major imaging features, LI-RADS uses ancillary imaging features to adjust the LI-RADS category to increase or decrease the suspicion for HCC. In this second article of a two-part series, we would discuss and illustrate a selection of LI-RADS ancillary imaging features