Aged Rats Exhibit Altered Behavior-Induced Oscillatory Activity, Place Cell Firing Rates, and Spatial Information Content in the CA1 Region of the Hippocampus

Hippocampal gamma and theta oscillations are associated with mnemonic and navigational processes and adapt to changes in the behavioral state of an animal to optimize spatial information processing. It has been shown that locomotor activity modulates gamma and theta frequencies in rats, although how age alters this modulation has not been well studied. Here, we examine gamma and theta local-field potential and place cell activity in the hippocampus CA1 region of young and old male rats as they performed a spatial eye-blink conditioning task across 31 d. Although mean gamma frequency was similar in both groups, gamma frequency increased with running speed at a slower rate in old animals. By contrast, theta frequencies scaled with speed similarly in both groups but were lower across speeds in old animals. Although these frequencies scaled equally well with deceleration and speed, acceleration was less correlated with gamma frequency in both age groups. Additionally, spike phase-locking to gamma, but not theta, was greater in older animals. Finally, aged rats had reduced within-field firing rates but greater spatial information per spike within the field. These data support a strong relationship between locomotor behavior and local-field potential activity and suggest that age significantly affects this relationship. Furthermore, observed changes in CA1 place cell firing rates and information content lend support to the hypothesis that age may result in more general and context-invariant hippocampal representations over more detailed information. These results may explain the observation that older adults tend to recall the gist of an experience rather than the details.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hippocampal oscillations and place cell activity are sensitive to sensorimotor input generated from active locomotion, yet studies of aged hippocampal function often do not account for this. By considering locomotion and spatial location, we identify novel age-associated differences in the scaling of oscillatory activity with speed, spike-field coherence, spatial information content, and within-field firing rates of CA1 place cells. These results indicate that age has an impact on the relationship between locomotion and hippocampal oscillatory activity, perhaps indicative of alterations to afferent input. These data also support the hypothesis that aged hippocampal place cells, compared with young, may more often represent more general spatial information. If true, these results may help explain why older humans tend to recall less specific and more gist-like information. Copyright © 2022 the authors.6 month embargo; published 01 June 2022This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Afatinib plus vinorelbine versus trastuzumab plus vinorelbine in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on one previous trastuzumab treatment (LUX-Breast 1): An open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

PubMed ID: 26822398Background: Trastuzumab resistance is a key therapeutic challenge in metastatic breast cancer. We postulated that broader inhibition of ErbB receptors with afatinib would improve clinical outcomes compared with HER2 inhibition alone in patients who had progressed on previous trastuzumab treatment. LUX-Breast 1 compared afatinib plus vinorelbine with trastuzumab plus vinorelbine for such patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods: We did this open-label trial at 350 hospitals in 41 countries worldwide. We enrolled female patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on or following adjuvant trastuzumab or first-line treatment of metastatic disease with trastuzumab. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) plus intravenous vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 per week) or intravenous trastuzumab (2 mg/kg per week after 4 mg/kg loading dose) plus vinorelbine. Randomisation was done centrally and stratified by previous trastuzumab treatment (adjuvant vs first-line treatment), hormone receptor status (oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive vs others), and region. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01125566. Findings: Between Aug 26, 2010, and April 26, 2013, we enrolled 508 patients: 339 assigned to the afatinib group and 169 assigned to the trastuzumab group. Recruitment was stopped on April 26, 2013, after a benefit-risk assessment by the independent data monitoring committee was unfavourable for the afatinib group. Patients on afatinib plus vinorelbine had to switch to trastuzumab plus vinorelbine, afatinib monotherapy, vinorelbine monotherapy, or receive treatment outside of the trial. Median follow-up was 9·3 months (IQR 3·7-16·0). Median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 5·4-5·6) in the afatinib group and 5·6 months (5·3-7·3) in the trastuzumab group (hazard ratio 1·10 95% CI 0·86-1·41; p=0·43). The most common drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (190 [56%] of 337 patients in the afatinib group vs 102 [60%] of 169 patients in the trastuzumab group), leucopenia (64 [19%] vs 34 [20%]), and diarrhoea (60 [18%] vs none). Interpretation: Trastuzumab-based therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on trastuzumab. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.Novartis AstraZeneca Boehringer Ingelheim Eisai KoreaWe showed that afatinib plus vinorelbine did not improve progression-free survival or objective response and was also associated with shorter overall survival compared with trastuzumab plus vinorelbine. Afatinib was also less well tolerated than was trastuzumab. Cross-signalling by other members of the ErbB family is thought to be an important mechanism through which HER2 can remain activated, despite HER2-targeted therapy. We therefore expected that broader inhibition of the ErbB family with afatinib might improve efficacy compared with trastuzumab in patients who were anticipated to have trastuzumab resistance (based on progression during or shortly after trastuzumab treatment). However, the results show that continuation of trastuzumab beyond progression conferred better outcomes than did switching to an ErbB family blocker. Our findings also suggest that the definition of trastuzumab resistance remains challenging. Despite progressing on or shortly after trastuzumab treatment, a proportion of patients may retain some sensitivity to this drug, which could have implications for future studies in this area. Our findings accord with those from studies of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. In the MA.31 trial, 23 a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus lapatinib was associated with shorter median progression-free survival than was a taxane plus trastuzumab for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (9·0 months vs 11·3 months; HR 1·37 [95% CI 1·13–1·65]; p=0·001), resulting in early closure of the trial. Overall survival did not significantly differ between lapatinib plus taxane and trastuzumab plus taxane in the intention-to-treat group (HR 1·28 [95% CI 0·95–1·72]; p=0·11); however, overall survival was worse with lapatinib than with trastuzumab in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive disease (HR 1·47 [95% CI 1·03–2·09]; p=0·03). 23 In the CEREBEL trial, 24 median progression-free survival and overall survival were shorter with lapatinib plus capecitabine than with trastuzumab plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, although the difference was not significant for overall survival (progression-free survival was 6·6 months vs 8·1 months; HR 1·30 [95% CI 1·04–1·64]; p=0·021; overall survival was 22·7 months vs 27·3 months; HR 1·34 [95% CI 0·95–1·90]; p=0·095). In MA.31, roughly 40% of patients had a primary diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and thus had not received any previous anti-HER2 treatment. By contrast, to our knowledge, our study is the first to compare trastuzumab-based treatment in multiple lines versus switching to an alternative treatment on progression. Furthermore, although MA.31 and CEREBEL assessed lapatinib (an EGFR and HER2 inhibitor), we used a second-generation irreversible ErbB family inhibitor to provide broader inhibition. By contrast with the CEREBEL trial, which included patients without brain metastases at baseline, our study enrolled those with inactive, asymptomatic brain metastases. In this small subgroup of patients, there was no evidence that switching to irreversible ErbB family inhibition was beneficial compared with remaining on trastuzumab-based therapy. Similarly, a retrospective subgroup analysis of EMILIA 25 showed that the rate of CNS progression was similar for patients receiving trastuzumab emtansine and those receiving lapatinib plus capecitabine. In the present study, the incidence of drug-related adverse events was consistent with the safety profiles of each drug; however afatinib plus vinorelbine was less well tolerated than was trastuzumab plus vinorelbine. More patients in the afatinib group than in the trastuzumab group had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, serious adverse events, and fatal adverse events. The incidence and severity of haematological adverse events (including neutropenia) were generally similar between treatment groups; however, more patients in the afatinib group had fatal infections than did those in the trastuzumab group. One potential explanation for poorer tolerability could be a negative pharmacological interaction between afatinib and vinorelbine. However, extensive investigation of the combination in phase 1 studies, 26,27 based on plasma exposure, did not suggest any pharmacokinetic interaction between these two compounds. LUX-Breast 1 was a large randomised multicentre trial; nevertheless, there were some limitations. First, recruitment was terminated early and patients receiving afatinib were required to switch to alternative treatments, which only enables an adequate comparison of efficacy and safety results between the randomised treatment groups up to the point of the treatment switch. The findings for overall survival could be affected by subsequent treatments, the data for which are still being collected, and many patients have still not had an overall survival event, which could render the findings immature. Additionally, second-generation antibodies, such as pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine (not available at the time of study design), are now standard treatments in many countries. As such, use of trastuzumab across multiple lines or trastuzumab plus vinorelbine as first-line treatment is limited in clinical practice. However, trastuzumab-based therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer failing on trastuzumab. Contributors NH, C-SH, ZS, R-GG, MU-F, BX, and MP-G designed the study. NH, C-SH, SH, D-CY, KHJ, KS, JR, Y-HI, MW, QS, and BX recruited patients. NH, C-SH, SH, D-CY, ZS, S-AI, KHJ, KS, JR, JJ, QZ, Y-HI, MW, QS, S-CC, MU-F, BX, and MP-G collected data. NH, C-SH, SH, S-AI, KHJ, JR, JJ, QZ, Y-HI, S-CC, R-GG, MU-F, and BX analysed and interpreted data. MU-F provided administrative and technical support. All authors drafted and reviewed the report, and approved the final version for submission. Declaration of interests NH has received research fees to her institution for conducting studies from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Roche and Novartis. C-SH has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. SH has received research funds to her institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Lilly, OBI Pharmaceuticals, Merrimack, PUMA, Biomarin, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen; personal fees for reimbursement for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Lilly, OBI Pharmaceuticals, and Merrimack; honoraria for leading an advisory board from Boehringer Ingelheim; and honoraria for speaking at a conference from Genentech/Roche. S-AI has received research funding from AstraZeneca and has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Roche. KHJ has received a grant from Eisai Korea. JJ has held an advisory role with Boehringer Ingelheim. R-GG and MU-F are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments This study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions, were involved at all stages of manuscript development and have approved the final version. We thank the patients, their families, and all of the investigators who participated in this study. Additionally, we thank the Boehringer Ingelheim trial manager Annick Lahogue for her excellent support throughout the trial. Medical writing assistance, supported financially by Boehringer Ingelheim, was provided by Caroline Allinson of GeoMed, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare, during the preparation of this Article. -

Marrow versus peripheral blood for geno-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia: Influence of dose and stem cell source shows better outcome with rich marrow

Several studies have compared bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) as stem cell sources in patients receiving allografts, but the cell doses infused have not been considered, especially for BM. Using the ALWP/EBMT registry, we retrospectively studied 881 adult patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), who received a non-T-depleted allogeneic BM (n = 515) or mobilized PB (n = 366) standard transplant, in first remission (CR1), from an HLA-identical sibling, over a 5-year period from January 1994. The BM cell dose ranged from 0.17 to 29 × 108/kg with a median of 2.7 × 108/kg. The PB cell dose ranged from 0.02 to 77 × 10 8/kg with a median of 9.3 × 108/kg. The median dose for patients receiving BM (2.7 × 108/kg) gave the greatest discrimination. In multivariate analyses, high-dose BM compared to PB was associated with lower transplant-related mortality (RR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; P = .04), better leukemia-free survival (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P = .013), and better overall survival (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0. 92; P = .016). The present study in patients with AML receiving allografts in first remission indicates a better outcome with BM as compared to PB, when the dose of BM infused is rich. © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology

Marrow versus peripheral blood for geno-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia: Influence of dose and stem cell source shows better outcome with rich marrow

PubMed ID: 12829583Several studies have compared bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) as stem cell sources in patients receiving allografts, but the cell doses infused have not been considered, especially for BM. Using the ALWP/EBMT registry, we retrospectively studied 881 adult patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), who received a non-T-depleted allogeneic BM (n = 515) or mobilized PB (n = 366) standard transplant, in first remission (CR1), from an HLA-identical sibling, over a 5-year period from January 1994. The BM cell dose ranged from 0.17 to 29 × 10 8 /kg with a median of 2.7 × 10 8 /kg. The PB cell dose ranged from 0.02 to 77 × 10 8 /kg with a median of 9.3 × 10 8 /kg. The median dose for patients receiving BM (2.7 × 10 8 /kg) gave the greatest discrimination. In multivariate analyses, high-dose BM compared to PB was associated with lower transplant-related mortality (RR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; P = .04), better leukemia-free survival (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P = .013), and better overall survival (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0. 92; P = .016). The present study in patients with AML receiving allografts in first remission indicates a better outcome with BM as compared to PB, when the dose of BM infused is rich. © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology