Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS): histopathologic classification, diagnostic workup, and therapeutic options

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) includes all kidney disorders caused by a monoclonal protein (M-protein) secreted by a small plasma cell clone or other B-cell clones in patients who do not meet the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma or other B-cell malignancies. The underlying disorder in patients with MGRS is generally consistent with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGRS-associated kidney disorders are various and the list is still expanding. The kidney disorders can manifest as glomerular diseases, tubulopathies, and vascular involvement with varying clinical presentations. Diagnosis is often challenging because of the wide spectrum of MGRS, and it is difficult to establish a pathogenic link between the presence of the M-protein or serum free light chains and kidney diseases; further complicating accurate diagnosis is the high incidence of MGUS and/or kidney disorders, independent of MGRS, in elderly patients. However, MGRS can significantly impair kidney function. Because treatment can stop and also reverse kidney disease, early recognition is of great importance. A combined haematologic and nephrologic approach is crucial to establish the causative role of the M-protein in the pathogenesis of kidney disease. Clone-directed therapy, which may include autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients, often results in improved outcomes. In this review, we discuss the histopathologic classification of MGRS lesions, provide a renal and haematologic diagnostic workup, discuss treatment options for MGRS, and introduce a Benelux MGRS Working Group.status: publishe

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed lymphoma results in accelerated haematopoietic reconstitution, improved quality of life and cost reduction compared with bone marrow transplantation: the Hovon 22 study

The present study analysed whether autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PSCT) improves engraftment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness when compared with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Relapsing progressive lymphoma patients (n = 204; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma n = 166; Hodgkin's disease n = 38) were, after induction treatment with the DHAP-VIM (cisplatin, cytarabine, dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, methotrexate) regimen, randomly (2:1) assigned to the harvest of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-mobilized stem cells after the second DHAP course or autologous bone marrow cells before the second DHAP course. These stem cells were reinfused following high-dose myeloblative chemotherapy. After induction, 118 patients obtained a partial or complete response and were eligible for randomization. In the PSCT arm (n = 76) significantly faster engraftment of neutrophils [greater than or equal to 0.1 and; greater than or equal to 0.5 x 10(9)/l: 10.7 d (7-36, median, range), 15 (9-45) versus 13 (8-25) and 26 (14-80), P <0.01] and thrombocytes [ 20 x 10(9)/l: 13 d (7-51) versus 18 (11-65), P <0.01] were observed. In addition, significantly fewer transfusions of red blood cells [6 (0-23) versus 8 (2-24), P <0.01] and platelets [4 (0-60) versus 8 (2-55), P = 0.01] were required in the PSCT arm. These findings were associated with a significant reduction in the median days of intravenous antibiotics in patients with fever [8.5 (0-30) versus 14 (0-34), P = 0.04] and hospital stay [27 (8-51) versus 34 (24-78), P <0.05]. Quality of life demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the PSCT arm. Total transplantation costs were significantly lower in the PSCT arm [$13 954 ($4913- 29 532) versus $17 668 ($10 170-44 083) P <0.05], as a result of the reduced hospital stay and lower antibiotic costs. In summary, these results indicate that PSCT is superior to ABMT with regard to engraftment, supportive care, quality of life and cost

Intranodal vaccination with mRNA-optimized dendritic cells in metastatic melanoma patients

Autologous dendritic cell (DC) therapy is an experimental cellular immunotherapy that is safe and immunogenic in patients with advanced melanoma. In an attempt to further improve the therapeutic responses, we treated 15 patients with melanoma, with autologous monocyte-derived immature DC electroporated with mRNA encoding CD40 ligand (CD40L), CD70 and a constitutively active TLR4 (caTLR4) together with mRNA encoding a tumor-associated antigen (TAA; respectively gp100 or tyrosinase). In addition, DC were pulsed with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) that served as a control antigen. Production of this DC vaccine with high cellular viability, high expression of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC class I and II and production of IL-12p70, was feasible in all patients. A vaccination cycle consisting of three vaccinations with up to 15×10(6) DC per vaccination at a biweekly interval, was repeated after 6 and 12 months in the absence of disease progression. mRNA-optimized DC were injected intranodally, because of low CCR7 expression on the DC, and induced de novo immune responses against control antigen. T cell responses against tyrosinase were detected in the skin-test infiltrating lymphocytes (SKIL) of two patients. One mixed tumor response and two durable tumor stabilizations were observed among 8 patients with evaluable disease at baseline. In conclusion, autologous mRNA-optimized DC can be safely administered intranodally to patients with metastatic melanoma but showed limited immunological responses against tyrosinase and gp10