MRSA prevalence in european healthcare settings: a review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the past two decades, methicillin-resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>(MRSA) has become increasingly common as a source of nosocomial infections. Most studies of MRSA surveillance were performed during outbreaks, so that results are not applicable to settings in which MRSA is endemic. This paper gives an overview of MRSA prevalence in hospitals and other healthcare institutions in non-outbreak situations in Western Europe.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A keyword search was conducted in the Medline database (2000 through June 2010). Titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies on MRSA prevalence in patients in non-outbreak situations in European healthcare facilities. Each study was assessed using seven quality criteria (outcome definition, time unit, target population, participants, observer bias, screening procedure, swabbing sites) and categorized as 'good', 'fair', or 'poor'.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>31 observational studies were included in the review. Four of the studies were of good quality. Surveillance screening of MRSA was performed in long-term care (11 studies) and acute care (20 studies). Prevalence rates varied over a wide range, from less than 1% to greater than 20%. Prevalence in the acute care and long-term care settings was comparable. The prevalence of MRSA was expressed in various ways - the percentage of MRSA among patients (range between 1% and 24%), the percentage of MRSA among <it>S. aureus </it>isolates (range between 5% and 54%), and as the prevalence density (range between 0.4 and 4 MRSA cases per 1,000 patient days). The screening policy differed with respect to time points (on admission or during hospital stay), selection criteria (all admissions or patients at high risk for MRSA) and anatomical sampling sites.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This review underlines the methodological differences between studies of MRSA surveillance. For comparisons between different healthcare settings, surveillance methods and outcome calculations should be standardized.</p

Colonização pelo Staphylococcus aureus em profissionais de enfermagem de um hospital escola de Pernambuco

O presente estudo foi realizado com o objetivo de identificar a prevalência de colonização pelo Staphylococcus aureus em profissionais de enfermagem de um hospital universitário de Pernambuco, bem como avaliar o perfil de resistência deles isoladamente. Para isso, foi realizado um estudo transversal, no qual foram coletadas amostras biológicas das mãos e da cavidade nasal. A identificação do S. aureus foi realizada por meio do semeio em agar-sangue, agar manitol-salgado e através dos testes de catalase e coagulase. O perfil de sensibilidade foi determinado pela técnica de Kirby Bauer e para determinação da resistência à meticilina foi realizado o screening em placa com oxacilina com adição de 4% de NaCl. Dos 151 profissionais avaliados, 39 se encontravam colonizados, o que demonstrou uma prevalência de 25,8%. Dentre as variáveis estudadas, a faixa etária e a quantidade de EPI apresentaram-se associadas à colonização pelo microrganismo. De todas as linhagens isoladas, apenas cinco apresentaram resistência à meticilina

Surveillance on secular trends of incidence and mortality for device–associated infection in the intensive care unit setting at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, 2000–2008: A retrospective observational study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Device–associated infection (DAI) plays an important part in nosocomial infection. Active surveillance and infection control are needed to disclose the specific situation in each hospital and to cope with this problem effectively. We examined the rates of DAI by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and 30–day and in–hospital mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Prospective surveillance was conducted in a mixed medical and surgical ICU at a major teaching hospital from 2000 through 2008. Trend analysis was performed and logistic regression was used to assess prognostic factors of mortality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The overall rate of DAIs was 3.03 episodes per 1000 device–days. The most common DAI type was catheter–associated urinary tract infection (3.76 per 1000 urinary catheter–days). There was a decrease in DAI rates in 2005 and rates of ventilator–associated pneumonia (VAP, 3.18 per 1000 ventilator–days) have remained low since then (<it>p</it> < 0.001). The crude rates of 30–day (33.6%) and in–hospital (52.3%) mortality, as well as infection by antibiotic-resistant VAP pathogens also decreased<it>.</it> The most common antimicrobial-resistant pathogens were methicillin–resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> (94.9%) and imipenem–resistant <it>Acinetobacter baumannii</it> (<it>p</it> < 0.001), which also increased at the most rapid rate<it>.</it> The rate of antimicrobial resistance among <it>Enterobacteriaceae</it> also increased significantly (<it>p</it> < 0.05). After controlling for potentially confounding factors, the DAI was an independent prognostic factor for both 30–day mortality (OR 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99–3.17, <it>p</it> = 0.001) and in–hospital mortality (OR 3.61, 95% CI 2.10–3.25, <it>p</it> < 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The decrease in the rate of DAI and infection by resistant bacteria on the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome can be attributed to active infection control and improved adherence after 2003.</p