The Effect of Heat Acclimatization and Heat Acclimation on Endurance Trained Athlete Substrate Utilization

Heat acclimatization (HAz) and Heat Acclimation (HA) are important strategies to induce thermoregulatory adaptations to mitigate negative impact of heat stress. However, despite improving endurance performance, few studies explore their impact on substrate utilization. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of HAz and HA on endurance athlete substrate utilization during submaximal exercise in the heat. METHODS: Fourteen endurance-trained male athletes (mean ± SD; age, 33 ± 9 years; body mass, 70.9 ± 10.1 kg; height, 177.7 ± 6.4 cm; VO2max, 59.3 ± 7.4 ml·kg−1·min−1; % body fat, 8.5% ± 3.9%) participated in this study. Participants performed 60 mins bouts of submaximal exercise (58.9 ± 2.2% vVO2max) in the heat (ambient temperature [Tamb], 35.5 ± 0.2°C; %relative humidity [%RH], 46.4% ± 1.3%; wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT], 29.3 ± 0.3°C; wind speed 4.0 ± 0.1 km·h−1). Prior to heat exposure (baseline), following HAz (post-HAz), and post-HA. During 60 min exercise, oxygen consumption (VO2) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were measured at the beginning (5-10 min), middle (30-35 min), and ending stages (55-60 min) of the protocol. Following the baseline, participants underwent self-directed summer training (HAz). Following post-HAz trials, participants underwent 5 days of HA sessions, which involved exercising to induce hyperthermia (38.50°C-39.75°C) for 60 minutes in the heat (Tamb, 39.1 ± 0.5°C; %RH, 51.8% ± 2.6%; WBGT, 33.4 ± 0.8°C) over an eight-day stretch. RESULTS: RER was significantly higher post-HAz (mean ± standard error; 0.85 ± 0.01) compared to baseline (0.81 ± 0.01, p2 difference between baseline (38.9 ± 1.2 ml·kg−1·min−1), post-HAz (37.5 ± 1.3 ml·kg−1·min−1, p= 0.062), or post-HA (38.5 ± 1.3 ml·kg−1·min−1, p=0.668). CONCLUSION: Self-directed HAz may impact athlete substrate utilization when performing submaximal exercise in a heated environment. Additionally, RER decreases as time of submaximal exercise in the heat increases. Other factors such as, athlete fitness level and exercise intensity, should also be considered when drawing conclusions regarding RER

Morning versus Afternoon Body Mass in Free-Living or Controlled Euhydration

The standard protocol to assess hydration status is by measuring body mass in the early morning without controlling fluid intake. However, obtaining first-morning body mass is not necessarily feasible for many situations, for example, most physical activities take place in the afternoon. Thus, first-morning body mass might not be practical to assess hydration status. PURPOSE: To investigate first-morning body mass versus afternoon body mass in free- living and controlled euhydration. METHODS: 9 males (age: 21 ± 2; mass: 79.7 ± 17.8 kg) and 5 females (age: 22 ± 2; mass: 60.5 ± 13.6 kg) visited the laboratory in the morning (7:00-9:00am) and afternoon (2:00-4:00pm) for six days to measure their nude body mass and urine specific gravity (USG). Participants were in the free-living (FL) condition for the first three consecutive days, and then in a euhydrated (EUH) state (USGRESULTS: There were no interactions between FL and EUH with morning and afternoon in USG (Morning-FL, 1.017±0.005; Afternoon-FL, 1.012±0.006; Morning-EUH, 1.011±0.004; Afternoon-EUH, 1.007±0.004; p=0.390). No statistically significant differences were found between morning and afternoon in both FL and EUH controlled (Morning-FL, 72.7±18.3 kg; Afternoon-FL, 72.0±18.1 kg; Morning-EUH, 72.9±18.1 kg; Afternoon-EUH, 73.1±18.1 kg, p=0.661). CONCLUSION: There is no difference between morning and afternoon body mass, regardless of the hydration status. This means that first morning body mass is no more, or less, accurate than afternoon

The Effects of Heat Acclimatization, Heat Acclimation, and Intermittent Heat Training on Maximal Oxygen Uptake

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is an important determinant of endurance performance. Heat acclimation/acclimatization (HA/HAz) strategies elicit improvements in endurance performance. When heat exposure is reduced, intermittent heat training (IHT) is potentially beneficial to alleviate HA/HAz adaptation decay, however corresponding VO2max responses are unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the effects of HA/HAz and IHT on VO2max in endurance runners and identify how long VO2max adaptations remain following removal of repeated heat exposure. METHODS: Twenty-seven male endurance runners (mean ± SD; age, 36 ± 12 years; body mass, 73.03 ± 8.97 kg; height, 178.81 ± 6.39 cm; VO2max, 57.48 ± 7.03 ml.kg-1.min-1) completed VO2max and exercise testing at five time points; baseline, pre-HA, post-HA, week 4 of IHT (IHT4), and week 8 of IHT (IHT8). Exercise testing and HA environmental conditions were the same (ambient temperature, 35.42 ± 1.06°C; relative humidity, 46.35 ± 2.48%). Following baseline testing, participants completed HAz, proceeded by 5 days of HA involving exercise to induce hyperthermia (38.50 - 39.50°C) for 60 minutes. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three IHT groups: once weekly (n = 9), twice weekly (n = 10), or no IHT (n = 8). Differences in VO2max and maximal heart rate at VO2max (HRmax) for baseline, pre-HA, post-HA, IHT4, and IHT8 were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni corrections post-hoc. RESULTS: No significant VO2max differences were observed between baseline (57.92 ± 6.82 ml.kg-1.min-1), pre-HA (59.65 ± 8.24 ml.kg-1.min-1), and post-HA (59.49 ± 7.18 ml.kg-1.min-1, p = 0.36). No significant group or time effects were identified for VO2max at post-HA, IHT4, and IHT8 (p = 0.67). However, significant HRmax differences were observed between baseline (180 ± 11 beats.min-1), pre-HA (177 ± 10 beats.min-1), and post-HA tests (175 ± 10 beats.min-1, p = 0.01). No significant group or time HRmax differences were shown for post-HA, IHT4, and IHT8 (p = 0.59). CONCLUSION: No changes in VO2max were identified among endurance runners following HA/HAz, potentially due to participants’ high aerobic fitness levels. As IHT maintained VO2max following 8 weeks without repeated heat exposure, it is potentially a beneficial strategy to minimize VO2max adaptation decay in endurance athletes

The Influence of Overbuilt Versus Game-Permitted American Football Facemasks on Peripheral Visuomotor Ability in NCAA Division I Football Athletes

Topics in Exercise Science and Kinesiology Volume 2: Issue 1, Article 9, 2021. Heavier facemask reinforcement has been shown to impair reaction time. While overbuilt facemasks are illegal for gameplay at all levels of competition, empirical rationale for this has not be realized and it is unknown if overbuilt facemasks are worse for peripheral vision than permitted ones. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of wearing an overbuilt facemask versus game permitted facemasks on peripheral visuomotor ability in collegiate football players. Male NCAA Division I football players (n=18) completed a 60-second peripheral visuomotor test on a Dynavision D2 visuomotor board under the following conditions: 1) Baseline (No helmet), 2) Helmet + Light reinforced facemask, 3) Helmet + Medium reinforced facemask, 4) Helmet + Heavy reinforced facemask, 5) Helmet + Overbuilt facemask. Overall peripheral reaction time (PRT) and PRT separated by rings and quadrants were analyzed. Points of application: 1) Regardless of facemask reinforcement, wearing protective headgear impairs peripheral reaction time (PRT) compared to baseline with no helmet. Addition of an overbuilt facemask significantly impairs PRT compared to NCAA permitted facemasks. 2) An overbuilt facemask exhibits the most visuomotor decrement in far peripheral visual fields. 3) Decreases in visuomotor ability while wearing an overbuilt facemask are most pronounced in lower regions of visual field

Deconstructing stereotypes: Stature, match-playing time, and performance in elite Women's World Cup soccer

Recruiting companies recommend elite female soccer players be ≥165 cm (5′5″) in stature. This study investigated if stature limits match-playing time and performance in elite World Cup soccer among players, positions, and countries. We hypothesized stature would not affect match-playing time or performance. Descriptive data were collected on 552 players from 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup. Odds ratios determined likelihood of starting for players <165 cm and ≥165 cm. ANOVAs compared playing time between stature groups, among positions, and between countries. Performance factors including assists, goals, attempts, corners, shots blocked, and defending blocks were reported. Independent t-tests compared differences between players (≥165 cm, < 165 cm). Data are reported, mean difference [95% confidence interval] [MD (95%CI)] and effect sizes (ES). On average, 32.3% of players were <165 cm. Of total players, no differences existed in total minutes (F = 0.98, p = 0.32), matches (F = 0.27 p = 0.59), or average minutes per match (F = 0.48, p = 0.49) between stature groups, regardless of position. No differences existed in playing time between players <165 cm and ≥165 cm among any positions (p > 0.05), or between countries (p > 0.05). Taller mid-fielders exhibited greater performance in goals, assists, attempts, shots blocked, and defending blocks (MD [95%CI] ES; assists, −0.44[−0.76,−0.11]0.59, p = 0.009; goals, −0.35[−0.69,−0.01]0.44, p = 0.047); attempts, 3.14[1.38, 4.90]0.80, p = 0.001; corners, 2.04[0.12, 3.95]0.48, p = 0.037; shots blocked, 0.96[0.40, 1.51]0.75, p = 0.001; defending blocks, 0.43[0.32,0.82]0.48, p = 0.035), however, actual differences were minimal. Our findings indicate stature does not inhibit playing and performing elite women's soccer, as nearly one-third of players were <165 cm

Deconstructing Stereotypes: Stature, Match-playing Time, and Performance in Elite Women\u27s World Cup Soccer

Recruiting companies recommend elite female soccer players be ≥165 cm (5\u275″) in stature. This study investigated if stature limits match-playing time and performance in elite World Cup soccer among players, positions, and countries. We hypothesized stature would not affect match-playing time or performance. Descriptive data were collected on 552 players from 2019 FIFA Women\u27s World Cup. Odds ratios determined likelihood of starting for players ≥165 cm. ANOVAs compared playing time between stature groups, among positions, and between countries. Performance factors including assists, goals, attempts, corners, shots blocked, and defending blocks were reported. Independent t-tests compared differences between players (≥165 cm, \u3c 165 cm). Data are reported, mean difference [95% confidence interval] [MD (95%CI)] and effect sizes (ES). On average, 32.3% of players were F = 0.98, p = 0.32), matches (F = 0.27 p = 0.59), or average minutes per match (F = 0.48, p = 0.49) between stature groups, regardless of position. No differences existed in playing time between players ≥165 cm among any positions (p \u3e 0.05), or between countries (p \u3e 0.05). Taller mid-fielders exhibited greater performance in goals, assists, attempts, shots blocked, and defending blocks (MD [95%CI] ES; assists, -0.44[-0.76,-0.11]0.59, p = 0.009; goals, -0.35[-0.69,-0.01]0.44, p = 0.047); attempts, 3.14[1.38, 4.90]0.80, p = 0.001; corners, 2.04[0.12, 3.95]0.48, p = 0.037; shots blocked, 0.96[0.40, 1.51]0.75, p = 0.001; defending blocks, 0.43[0.32,0.82]0.48, p = 0.035), however, actual differences were minimal. Our findings indicate stature does not inhibit playing and performing elite women\u27s soccer, as nearly one-third of players were \u3c165 \u3ecm

Heat Safety in the Workplace:Modified Delphi Consensus to Establish Strategies and Resources to Protect U.S Workers

The purpose of this consensus document was to develop feasible, evidence‐based occupational heat safety recommendations to protect the US workers that experience heat stress. Heat safety recommendations were created to protect worker health and to avoid productivity losses associated with occupational heat stress. Recommendations were tailored to be utilized by safety managers, industrial hygienists, and the employers who bear responsibility for implementing heat safety plans. An interdisciplinary roundtable comprised of 51 experts was assembled to create a narrative review summarizing current data and gaps in knowledge within eight heat safety topics: (a) heat hygiene, (b) hydration, (c) heat acclimatization, (d) environmental monitoring, (e) physiological monitoring, (f) body cooling, (g) textiles and personal protective gear, and (h) emergency action plan implementation. The consensus‐based recommendations for each topic were created using the Delphi method and evaluated based on scientific evidence, feasibility, and clarity. The current document presents 40 occupational heat safety recommendations across all eight topics. Establishing these recommendations will help organizations and employers create effective heat safety plans for their workplaces, address factors that limit the implementation of heat safety best‐practices and protect worker health and productivity

Pertinacity Spring Volume 5 Issue 10

Pertinacity is a biannual magazine that features stories and reports on recent Korey Stringer Institute\u27s initiatives.https://opencommons.uconn.edu/pertinacity/1010/thumbnail.jp