Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report on the Operations and Accomplishments of the Office of the General Counsel

[Excerpt] The Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) to give litigation authority to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and provide for a General Counsel, appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 4-year term, with responsibility for conducting the Commission\u27s litigation program. Following transfer of enforcement functions from the U.S. Department of Labor to the Commission under a 1978 Presidential Reorganization Plan, the General Counsel became responsible for conducting Commission litigation under the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). With the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), the General Counsel became responsible for conducting Commission litigation under the employment provisions of that statute (Title I; effective July 1992). The mission of EEOC’s Office of General Counsel (OGC) is to conduct litigation on behalf of the Commission to obtain relief for victims of employment discrimination and ensure compliance with the statutes that EEOC is charged with enforcing. Under Title VII and the ADA, the Commission can sue nongovernmental employers with 15 or more employees. The Commission’s suit authority under the ADEA (20 or more employees) and the EPA (no employee minimum) includes state and local governmental employers as well as private employers. Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA also cover labor organizations and employment agencies, and the EPA prohibits labor organizations from attempting to cause an employer to violate that statute. OGC also represents the Commission on administrative claims and litigation brought by agency applicants and employees, and provides legal advice to the agency on employment-related matters

CGIAR Intellectual Assets Report 2013

2013 CGIAR Intellectual Assets Repor

Proposed HSC Governance Regents Policy Revisions

Attached is a packet of proposed revised Regents policies pertaining to the HSC Governance reorganization proposal. After careful review, the Policy Office concluded that the earlier format of proposed revisions to Regent Policy 2.13 (which was originally presented to the Regents on November 16, 2010 and integrated a range of policy modifications into a single and very lengthy policy), was confusing and administratively burdensome. Therefore, the previously circulated Regent Policy 2.13 has been replaced by four separate proposed Regent policies, RPM\xa7\xa7 3.4 through 3.7. The general structure of the Health Sciences Center, as well as the role of the new Chancellor for Health Sciences, is now addressed in proposed Regent Policy 3.4. The UNM Health Sciences Board of Directors, the new governance body for the Health Sciences Center and the UNM Health System, is created through proposed Regent Policy 3.5. The UNM Hospital Board of Trustees is now addressed in proposed Regent Policy 3.6. Proposed Regent Policy 3.7 delineates the University\\u27s Institutional Compliance Program. We have included a track changes version of the draft Regent Policy 2.13 sent to the Regents on November 16th for your convenience

CGIAR Intellectual Assets (IA) Report for 2012

This CGIAR Intellectual Assets Report covers the year 2012 and is the first public report submitted by the Consortium to the Fund Council in accordance with Article 10.3 of the CGIAR Principles on the Management of Intellectual Assets (“CGIAR IA Principles”). It was developed after consultation with the Centers involved and the FC IP Group. The report is structured in accordance with the template contained in Annex 4 of the Implementation Guidelines for the CGIAR IA Principles approved by the Consortium Board on 14 June 2013

Presidential Succession and Delegation in Case of Disability

Memo issued four days after the Reagan assassination attempt.https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_executive_materials/1003/thumbnail.jp

Amici Curiae Brief on Behalf of Chief Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy, and the Anti-Defamation League, In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Fighting Arizona\u27s Attack on Ethnic Studies - Maya Arce, et al. v. John Huppenthal, et. a

Brief of the National Education Association and Arizona Education Association as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Fighting Arizona\u27s Attack on Ethnic Studies - Maya Arce, et al. v. John Huppenthal, et. a

Brief of the National Education Association and Arizona Education Association as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Fighting Arizona\u27s Attack on Ethnic Studies - Maya Arce, et al. v. John Huppenthal, et. a

Brief of Amicus Curiae Latina and Latino Critical Legal Theory, Inc. Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellants Urging Reversal

Fighting Arizona\u27s Attack on Ethnic Studies - Maya Arce, et al. v. John Huppenthal, et. a

Brief of Freedom to Read Foundation, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Supporting Reversal

Fighting Arizona\u27s Attack on Ethnic Studies - Maya Arce, et al. v. John Huppenthal, et. a