Synthesis of Lessons Learned from Initial Implementation of the CGIAR Pilot Challenge Programs

Joint report prepared by the CGIAR Secretariat and the Science Council Secretariat to synthesize lessons learned from the CGIAR pilot challenge programs and to make recommendations on the programs. This document was discussed at the CGIAR Business Meeting during AGM 2004

Experiences of the ExCo Ad Hoc Committee from the First Cycle of the New CGIAR Nomination Process

The new CGIAR nominee process was approved by the CGIAR in 2004 and subsequently launched in early 2005. Although the new process is scheduled to be piloted for two years, some lessons can be drawn at this early stage . The ExCo Ad Hoc Committee, acting on behalf of ExCo in the nomination process, identified three major weaknesses in the agreed procedures: (1) inconsistency in the criteria applied for the selection of CGIAR nominees, (2) lack of awareness and knowledge about the new process, and (3) tight tentative time schedule for each step in the nomination. As a result, two options for taking the exercise forward have been identified: 1. Pilot another cycle using the same procedures, and introduce refinements only after two or more cycles are completed, consistent with the CGIAR decision of AGM 04. 2. Pilot another cycle, benefiting from the lessons learnt so far and make amendments to the procedures which will be implemented in the second cycle. The ExCo Ad Hoc Committee suggests following option 2. This document contains a note from Uwe Werblow, ILRI Board Chair. This document was discussed at the Business Meeeting at AGM2005

Information on cooperation between the CMEA member countries in the field of environmental protection and improvement and the related rational use of natural resources

Meeting: World Commission on Environment and Development, Public Hearing, 24-25 June 1985, Oslo, NORelated to DAP 87-4249 under which IDRC supported the WCED to acquire and duplicate original papers, submissions, tapes and transcripts, became the depository of all original archival materials and received the right to microfiche the collection for broader disseminatio

Tackling Women's Vulnerabilities through Integrating a Gender Perspective into Disaster Risk Reduction in the Built Environment

The majority of human and direct economic losses from natural hazards occur as a result of damage to the built environment due to the vital role that the built environment performs in serving human endeavours. One of the key reasons for people in developing countries to be more vulnerable to natural disasters than their wealthier counterparts is the limited capacities in their construction industries. Among the people in developing countries, women are evidently even more vulnerable to natural disasters. Due to higher disaster vulnerability of women, recognising the different roles, capacities, vulnerabilities and needs of women, and considering them in disaster risk reduction in the built environment is significant to reduce women’s disaster vulnerabilities. Gender mainstreaming as a way of bringing a gender perspective into disaster risk reduction can be applied to recognise the varying needs and capacities of women, and integrate them into disaster risk reduction in the built environment. The paper in this context aims to demonstrate how gender mainstreaming helps to bring a women’s perspective into disaster risk reduction in the built environment. It identifies two main steps which involve in the process, identification of women’s DRR knowledge and needs, and integration of the identified DRR knowledge and needs into DRR in the built environment. The paper provides an account of the process that the study established to incorporate a gender perspective into disaster risk reduction in the built environment based on a case study conducted in Sri Lanka. It further discusses how the social, economic, political and environmental context influences the process of gender mainstreaming in disaster risk reduction in the built environmen

Bacteriophages to control Shiga toxin-producing E. coli safety and regulatory challenges

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are usually found on food products due to contamination from the fecal origin, as their main environmental reservoir is considered to be the gut of ruminants. While this pathogen is far from the incidence of other well-known foodborne bacteria, the severity of STEC infections in humans has triggered global concerns as far as its incidence and control are concerned. Major control strategies for foodborne pathogens in food-related settings usually involve traditional sterilization/disinfection techniques. However, there is an increasing need for the development of further strategies to enhance the antimicrobial outcome, either on food-contact surfaces or directly in food matrices. Phages are considered to be a good alternative to control foodborne pathogens, with some phage-based products already cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in the food industry. In European countries, phage-based food decontaminants have already been used. Nevertheless, its broad use in the European Union is not yet possible due to the lack of specific guidelines for the approval of these products. Furthermore, some safety concerns remain to be addressed so that the regulatory requirements can be met. In this review, we present an overview of the main virulence factors of STEC and introduce phages as promising biocontrol agents for STEC control. We further present the regulatory constraints on the approval of phages for food applications and discuss safety concerns that are still impairing their use.The authors thank the Portuguese Foundation for Scienceand Technology (FCT) through the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2019 unit, and the project PhageSTEC [PTDC/CVT-CVT/29628/2017], under the scope of COMPETE 2020 [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029628]. The author GP acknowledges theFCT grant [SFRH/BD/117365/2016].info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Power, Connected Coalitions, and Efficiency: Challenges to the Council of the European Union

This article is concerned with challenges to reforming the voting procedures of the Council of the European Union (EU). The next major waves of EU enlargement will cause the Union to increase to a membership of first twenty-one, and then twenty-six or possibly even more states. How does enlargement affect the Council's inherent "capacity to act" under the currently used qualified majority voting rule? It is demon strated here that the expected increase in EU membership will most likely induce a larger "status quo bias" as compared to the present situation in the Council if the crucial majority decision quota is not lowered. In addition, the article is responding to some criticism that has been applied against assessing the leverage of EU governments in one of the EU's most important institutions: the Council of the EU. By resorting to techniques that capture the influence of a priori coalitions on the one hand and "connected coalitions" among EU governments on the other—applying n- person cooperative game theory—the piece illustrates how the assessment of relative voting leverage in the framework of weighted voting systems may be extended and applied to situations in which the specific distribu tion of members' preferences is known. These calculations are again relevant in the face of the upcoming rounds of EU enlargement and projects for institutional reform.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68064/2/10.1177_019251219902000404.pd