Model-based analyses: Promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control

We discuss a recent approach to investigating cognitive control, which has the potential to deal with some of the challenges inherent in this endeavour. In a model-based approach, the researcher defines a formal, computational model that performs the task at hand and whose performance matches that of a research participant. The internal variables in such a model might then be taken as proxies for latent variables computed in the brain. We discuss the potential advantages of such an approach for the study of the neural underpinnings of cognitive control and its pitfalls, and we make explicit the assumptions underlying the interpretation of data obtained using this approach

Plane-wave impulse approximation extraction of the neutron magnetic form factor from quasielastic 3He(e,e′) at Q2=0.3 to 0.6 (GeV/c)2

A high precision measurement of the transverse spin-dependent asymmetry AT′ in 3He(e,e′) quasielastic scattering was performed in Hall A at Jefferson Lab at values of the squared four-momentum transfer, Q2, between 0.1 and 0.6 (GeV/c)2. AT′ is sensitive to the neutron magnetic form factor, GMn. Values of GMn at Q2=0.1 and 0.2 (GeV/c)2, extracted using Faddeev calculations, were reported previously. Here, we report the extraction of GMn for the remaining Q2 values in the range from 0.3 to 0.6 (GeV/c)2 using a plane-wave impulse approximation calculation. The results are in good agreement with recent precision data from experiments using a deuterium target

Plane-wave impulse approximation extraction of the neutron magnetic form factor from quasielastic 3He(e,e′) at Q2=0.3 to 0.6 (GeV/c)2

A high precision measurement of the transverse spin-dependent asymmetry AT′ in 3He(e,e′) quasielastic scattering was performed in Hall A at Jefferson Lab at values of the squared four-momentum transfer, Q2, between 0.1 and 0.6 (GeV/c)2. AT′ is sensitive to the neutron magnetic form factor, GMn. Values of GMn at Q2=0.1 and 0.2 (GeV/c)2, extracted using Faddeev calculations, were reported previously. Here, we report the extraction of GMn for the remaining Q2 values in the range from 0.3 to 0.6 (GeV/c)2 using a plane-wave impulse approximation calculation. The results are in good agreement with recent precision data from experiments using a deuterium target

Extraction of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor from Quasi-Elastic 3He(pol)(e(pol),e') at Q^2 = 0.1 - 0.6 (GeV/c)^2

We have measured the spin-dependent transverse asymmetry, A_T', in quasi-elastic inclusive electron scattering from polarized 3He with high precision at Q^2 = 0.1 to 0.6 (GeV/c)^2. The neutron magnetic form factor, GMn, was extracted at Q^2 = 0.1 and 0.2 (GeV/c)^2 using a non-relativistic Faddeev calculation that includes both final-state interactions (FSI) and meson-exchange currents (MEC). In addition, GMn was extracted at Q^2 = 0.3 to 0.6 (GeV/c)^2 using a Plane Wave Impulse Approximation calculation. The accuracy of the modeling of FSI and MEC effects was tested and confirmed with a precision measurement of the spin-dependent asymmetry in the breakup threshold region of the 3He(pol)(e(pol),e') reaction. The total relative uncertainty of the extracted GMn data is approximately 3%. Close agreement was found with other recent high-precision GMn data in this Q^2 range.Comment: Archival paper, 17 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables, submitted to Physical Review C. v2: shortened considerably, updated comparison to theor

Synthesis and characterization of gallium(III) dithiocarbamates as suitable nano-gallium(III) sulfide precursors

Gallium(III) complexes [Ga(chmdtc) 3 ] (1) and [Ga(chedtc) 3 ] (2) (where chmdtc = cyclohexylmethyldithiocarbamate and chedtc = cyclohexylethyldithiocarbamate) have been prepared and characterized by infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H and 13 C) spectra, thermo- gravimetry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and single crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). The thermogravimetric curves obtained for both complexes are almost similar. The final residue corresponded to gallium sulfide (Ga 2 S 3 ) above 700°C for complexes (1) and (2). In the single crystal X-ray structure of [Ga(chedtc) 3 ] (2), Ga-S bonds, and the associated C-S bonds show asymmetry as a requirement of packing. The complex shows distorted octahedral geometry due to its bite angle variations. Nano-α-Ga 2 S 3 was prepared from single source precursors [Ga(chmdtc) 3 ] (1) and [Ga(chedtc) 3 ] (2). Prepared nano-Ga 2 S 3 have been characterized by powder XRD, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy technique, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)-selected area electron diffraction analysis showing the nano-sized nature of Ga 2 S 3 . TEM micrographs confirmed the size of the particles to be 50 nm