39 research outputs found
Debating Buchanan's "Our Moral Fate"
AbstractThis contribution has two main goals which might be labelled for convenience as apars construensandpars denstruensreversing the usual order of these terms. The first aim is to offer an overview of the main tenets of the book, while the second aim is to raise some critical concerns while remaining sympathetic to the author's overall project. With regard to the first point, I present the context of intellectual debate where Buchanan's contribution fits comfortably: Darwin's evolutionary theory, anthropology, psychology, moral analysis etc. The target here is to show the internal complexity and different layers of analysis of the book. These initial reconstructions are, next, used to formulate some thoughts on what I consider possible problematic points in need of clarification. In particular, first, I hold that Buchanan presents too narrow oppositional views between intergroup relations whereupon the notion of "tribalism" is constructed. Such strong identitarian conception does not seem to depict adequately the sociological dynamics of intergroup relations. Second, I consider the terms in which it can be addressed the notion of the rise of the moral mind in evolutionary terms. The suggestion is to consider in a milder form the author's key concept of a "Great Uncoupling" for the moral reason
Justification and Application of Human Rights : Author's Reply to Critics
In this reply I explain the philosophical project behind the book and the reasons for its expansion in occasion of the second edition. I respond to the challenging remarks of my critics and clarify in which terms I adopt a Hegelian approach to a theory of human rights. Hopefully, this should guide the reader through the requested clarifications I provide with regard to functional aspects and possible applications of the theory
The “war” against Covid-19: state of exception, state of siege, or constitutional emergency powers?: the Italian case in comparative perspective
What Does Cultural Difference Require of Human Rights
Th e contemporary right to freedom of thought together with all its further
declinations into freedom of speech, religion, conscience and expression,
had one of its earliest historical recognitions at the end of the Wars
of Religion with the Edict of Nantes (1598). In several respects one can saythat the right to freedom of thought is virtually “co-original” with the endof the Wars of Religion. Following this thought further, one might think that human rights defi ne the boundaries of our social coexistence and are inextricably connected to the “fact” of cultural pluralism