Eccentric gaze direction in patients with central field loss

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE.: This study describes the binocular eccentric gaze direction (EGD) of 434 patients with binocular central field loss and presents a comparison with other studies on eccentric gaze behavior. METHODS.: We reviewed the records of 434 patients with bilateral central scotomas. Eligible patients had not received eccentric viewing training and demonstrated a spontaneously developed eccentric gaze behavior. Data were collected on monocular and binocular EGD, visual acuity, and underlying ocular pathology. Findings concerning the EGD were compared with other studies that evaluated gaze behavior in patients with central field loss. RESULTS.: In the group of 434 patients, age-related macular disease was the most frequent pathology (77%). The majority of these patients demonstrated a binocular EGD (bEGD) to the right (50%). In 25% of the patients, a superior bEGD was found. Less often, a bEGD to the left (14%) and to inferior (11%) were encountered. Review of the literature indicates that the majority of patients developed a monocular EGD in the superior direction. CONCLUSIONS.: This is a study on bEGD behavior in a large population of patients with bilateral central scotomas. The bEGD was guided by the gaze of the better-seeing eye. The preference for a bEGD to the right differs from findings of previous studies. Review of the literature suggests that not only the ocular pathology but also the method of investigation is most likely to influence the observed EGD. Most studies evaluated the location of the preferred retinal locus using a monocular technique; this may not reflect an individual's actual binocular behavior as it relates to activities of daily living

Crowded task performance in visually impaired children:Comparing magnifier and large print

<p>This study compares the influence of two different types of magnification (magnifier versus large print) on crowded near vision task performance.</p><p>Fifty-eight visually impaired children aged 4-8 years participated. Participants were divided in two groups, matched on age and near visual acuity (NVA): [1] the magnifier group (4-6 year olds [n = 13] and 7-8 year olds [n = 19]), and [2] the large print group (4-6 year olds [n = 12] and 7-8 year olds [n = 14]). At baseline, single and crowded Landolt C acuity were measured at 40 cm without magnification. Crowded near vision was measured again with magnification. A 90 mm diameter dome magnifier was chosen to avoid measuring the confounding effect of navigational skills. The magnifier provided 1.7x magnification and the large print provided 1.8x magnification. Performance measures: [1] NVA without magnification at 40 cm, [2] near vision with magnification, and [3] response time. Working distance was monitored.</p><p>There was no difference in performance between the two types of magnification for the 4-6 year olds and the 7-8 year olds (p's = .291 and .246, respectively). Average NVA in the 4-6 year old group was 0.95 logMAR without and 0.42 logMAR with magnification (p <.001). Average NVA in the 7-8 year was 0.71 logMAR without and 0.01 logMAR with magnification (p <.001). Stronger crowding effects predicted larger improvements of near vision with magnification (p = .021).</p><p>A magnifier is equally effective as large print in improving the performance of young children with a range of visual acuities on a crowded near vision task. Visually impaired children with stronger crowding effects showed larger improvements when working with magnification.</p>