Impact of medication regimen simplification on medication incidents in residential aged care: Simpler randomized controlled trial

In the SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm care Residents (SIMPLER) cluster-randomized controlled trial, we investigated the impact of a structured medication regimen simplification intervention on medication incidents in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) over a 12-month follow-up. A clinical pharmacist applied the validated 5-step Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) for 96 of the 99 participating residents in the four intervention RACFs. The 143 participating residents in the comparison RACFs received usual care. Over 12 months, medication incident rates were 95 and 66 per 100 resident-years in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively (adjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–2.38). The 12-month pre/post incident rate almost halved among participants in the intervention group (adjusted IRR 0.56; 95%CI 0.38–0.80). A significant reduction in 12-month pre/post incident rate was also observed in the comparison group (adjusted IRR 0.67, 95%CI 0.50–0.90). Medication incidents over 12 months were often minor in severity. Declines in 12-month pre/post incident rates were observed in both study arms; however, rates were not significantly different among residents who received and did not receive a one-off structured medication regimen simplification intervention

Developing a dementia-specific preference-­based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol

Introduction: Generic instruments for assessing health-related quality of life may lack the sensitivity to detect changes in health specific to certain conditions, such as dementia. The QOL-AD is a widely used and well validated condition-specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life for people living with dementia, but it does not enable the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), the basis of cost utility analysis. This study will generate a preference-based scoring algorithm for a health state classification system (the AD-5D) derived from the QOL-AD. Methods and analysis: Discrete choice experiments with duration (DCETTO) and best-worst scaling (BWS) health state valuation tasks will be administered to a representative sample of 2,000 members of the Australian general population via an online survey and to 250 dementia dyads (250 people with dementia and their carers) via face-to-face interview. A multinomial (conditional) logistic framework will be used to analyse responses and produce the utility algorithm for the AD-5D. Ethics and dissemination: The algorithms developed will enable prospective and retrospective economic evaluation of any treatment or intervention targeting people with dementia where the QOL-AD has been administered and will be available online. Results will be disseminated through journals that publish health economics articles and through professional conferences. The study has ethical approval

The risk of fall-related hospitalisations at entry into permanent residential aged care

Background: Entering permanent residential aged care (PRAC) is a vulnerable time for individuals. While falls risk assessment tools exist, these have not leveraged routinely collected and integrated information from the Australian aged and health care sectors. Our study examined individual, system, medication, and health care related factors at PRAC entry that are predictors of fall-related hospitalisations and developed a risk assessment tool using integrated aged and health care data. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on N=32,316 individuals ≥65 years old who entered a PRAC facility (01/01/2009-31/12/2016). Fall-related hospitalisations within 90 or 365days were the outcomes of interest. Individual, system, medication, and health care-related factors were examined as predictors. Risk prediction models were developed using elastic nets penalised regression and Fine and Gray models. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) assessed model discrimination. Results: 64.2% (N =20,757) of the cohort were women and the median age was 85 years old (interquartile range 80-89). After PRAC entry, 3.7% (N =1209) had a fall-related hospitalisation within 90days and 9.8% (N =3156) within 365days. Twenty variables contributed to fall-related hospitalisation prediction within 90days and the strongest predictors included fracture history (sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR)=1.87, 95% confdence interval (CI) 1.63-2.15), falls history (sHR=1.41, 95%CI 1.21-2.15), and dementia (sHR=1.39, 95%CI 1.22-1.57). Twenty-seven predictors of fallrelated hospitalisation within 365days were identifed, the strongest predictors included dementia (sHR=1.36, 95%CI 1.24-1.50), history of falls (sHR=1.30, 95%CI 1.20-1.42) and fractures (sHR=1.28, 95%CI 1.15-1.41). The risk prediction models had an AUC of 0.71 (95%CI 0.68-0.74) for fall-related hospitalisations within 90days and 0.64 (95%CI 0.62-0.67) for within 365days. Conclusion: Routinely collected aged and health care data, when integrated at a clear point of action such as entry into PRAC, can identify residents at risk of fall-related hospitalisations, providing an opportunity for better targeting risk mitigation strategies.Maria C. Inacio, Max Moldovan, Craig Whitehead, Janet K. Sluggett, Maria Crotty, Megan Corlis, Renuka Visvanathan, Steve Wesselingh, and Gillian E. Caughe

Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA): framework and plan

First published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026319 on 19 June 2019INTRODUCTION:Australia's ageing population puts significant demands on the aged care and healthcare sectors. To monitor the provision of aged care and healthcare services to older people, each government body has an individual data collection system. Together these systems can be the basis for creating the evidence necessary to support future allocation of resources for our ageing community. The Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA) is a cross-sector multidisciplinary (ie, aged care and healthcare) platform built to address the challenges of monitoring people in aged care settings. This protocol describes the ROSA's framework and plans. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:A registry to capture 16 000 South Australians/year undergoing an aged care eligibility assessment was designed. ROSA will contain information captured by the Commonwealth and South Australian state Health Authority, linked by two data integrating authorities, and housed on a secured data platform. ROSA will contain information on the sociodemographic, health, function, psychological, social, home and safety assessment and concerns characteristics, aged care services, general health services, and mortality of people receiving aged care services. Registered participants will be prospectively monitored until their death and yearly updates of their aged care and healthcare services information will be added to the registry. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:ROSA will longitudinally monitor the services provided to a population that puts costly demands on the state healthcare and aged care systems, identify unwanted variation, and underpin future research. ROSA's expected outputs include an annual report, a research agenda that focuses on high burden conditions and potentially economically impactful questions, educational materials, and risk profiling tools. ROSA was approved by the South Australian Department for Health and Ageing HREC (HREC/17/SAH/125) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare HREC (EO2018/2/429).Maria C Inacio, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth Bray, Craig Whitehead, Megan Corlis, Renuka Visvanathan, Keith Evans, Elizabeth C Griffith, Steve L Wesseling

Health status and healthcare trends of individuals accessing Australian aged care programmes over a decade: the Registry of Senior Australians historical cohort

BACKGROUND:Understanding the health profile, service, and medicine use of Australians in the aged care sector will help inform appropriate service provision for our ageing population. AIMS:To examine the 2006-2015 trends in (1) co-morbidities and frailty of individuals accessing aged care and (2) health services, medicine use, and mortality after entry into long term care. METHODS:A cross-sectional and population-based trend analysis were conducted using the Registry of Senior Australians. RESULTS:From 2006-2015, 509,944 individuals accessed permanent residential care, 206,394 home care, 283,014 respite, and 124,943 transition care. Over this time, the proportion of individuals accessing permanent residential care with high frailty scores (≥0.3) increased (19.7% to 49.7%), as did the proportion with 5-9 co-morbidities (46.4% to 54.5%), with similar trends observed for those accessing other services. The median number of medicines dispensed in the year after entering permanent residential care increased from 9 (interquartile range (IQR) 6-12) to 10 (IQR 7-14), while remaining stable in home care (2006:9 IQR 5-12, 2015:9, IQR 6-13). Short-term (within 100 days) mortality in those accessing permanent care was higher in 2006 (15.6%, 95%CI 15.2-16.0%) than 2015 (14.6%, 95%CI 14.3-14.9%), while longer term (101-1095 days, 2006: 44.3%, 95%CI 43.7-45.0%, 2015: 46.4%, 95%CI 45.8-46.9%) mortality was higher. Mortality in individuals accessing home care did not change. CONCLUSION:The health of older Australians accessing aged care programs has declined while frailty increased, with an increasing use of medicine and worse long-term mortality in some. Funding and care models need to adapt to this changing profile.Maria C. Inacio, Catherine Lang, Sarah C. E. Bray, Renuka Visvanathan, Craig Whitehead, Elizabeth C. Griffith, Keith Evans, Megan Corlis and Steve Wesseling

Development and validation of the medication regimen simplification guide for residential aged CarE (MRS GRACE)

Background: Residents of aged care facilities use increasingly complex medication regimens. Reducing unnecessary medication regimen complexity (eg, by consolidating the number of administration times or using alternative formulations) may benefit residents and staff. Objective: To develop and validate an implicit tool to facilitate medication regimen simplification in aged care facilities. Method: A purposively selected multidisciplinary expert panel used modified nominal group technique to identify and prioritize factors important in determining whether a medication regimen can be simplified. The five prioritized factors were formulated as questions, pilot-tested using non-identifiable medication charts and refined by panel members. The final tool was validated by two clinical pharmacists who independently applied the tool to a random sample of 50 residents of aged care facilities to identify opportunities for medication regimen simplification. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa. Results: The Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) was developed as an implicit tool comprising of five questions about 1) the resident; 2) regulatory and safety requirements; 3) drug interactions; 4) formulation; and 5) facility and follow-up considerations. Using MRS GRACE, two pharmacists independently simplified medication regimens for 29/50 and 30/50 residents (Cohen’s kappa=0.38, 95% CI 0.12–0.64), respectively. Simplification was possible for all residents with five or more administration times. Changing an administration time comprised 75% of the two pharmacists’ recommendations. Conclusions: Using MRS GRACE, two clinical pharmacists independently simplified over half of residents’ medication regimens with fair agreement. MRS GRACE is a promising new tool to guide medication regimen simplification in aged care.Esa YH Chen, Janet K Sluggett, Jenni Ilomäki, Sarah N Hilmer, Megan Corlis, Leonie J Picton, Laura Dean, Christopher P Alderman, Nicholas Farinola, Joy Gailer, Jane Grigson, Andrew R Kellie, Peter JC Putsey, Solomon Yu, J Simon Bel

Variation in Provision of Collaborative Medication Reviews on Entry to Long-Term Care Facilities

Objectives: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are comprehensive medication reviews conducted by clinical pharmacists and general medical practitioners. RMMRs are the primary government-funded service to optimize medication management in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and are recommended for all new residents. This study investigated resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision within 90 days of RACF entry and national intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Design: National retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: Individuals aged ≥65 years who first entered permanent residential aged care in Australia between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, received at least 1 medication in the previous year, and were alive at 90 days post-RACF entry. Methods: Resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Crude and risk-adjusted funnel plots were used to examine intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Results: Of the 143,676 residents from 2799 RACFs included, 30,883 (21.5%) received an RMMR within 90 days. Resident characteristics associated with timely provision included dementia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.08), primary language other than English (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), number of unique prescriptions dispensed in the previous year (aOR [per additional 5 prescriptions] 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), need for medication administration assistance (aORs ranged from 1.35 to 1.42, compared with residents self-managing) and facility remoteness (aORs ranged from 0.67 to 0.75 for residents outside major cities). The proportion of new residents receiving a timely RMMR ranged from 0% (n = 303 RACFs) to 100% (n = 4 RACFs). There were 174 RACFs (6.2%) in which ≥50% of new residents received a timely RMMR. Conclusions and implications: Although there was some evidence that RMMRs are targeted to individuals with a greater burden of medication use and those living with dementia, considerable variation in provision exists nationally. This flagship medication review service is generally underutilized among residents of Australian RACFs.Janet K. Sluggett, J. Simon Bell, Catherine Lang, Megan Corlis, Craig Whitehead, Steve L. Wesselingh, Maria C. Inaci

Residential medication management reviews in Australian residential aged care facilities

Abstract not availableJanet K Sluggett, J Simon Bell, Catherine Lang, Megan Corlis, Craig Whitehead, Steven L Wesselingh, Maria C Inaci

Introducing consumer directed care in residential care settings for older people in Australia: Views of a citizens’ jury

Objectives: Health services worldwide are increasingly adopting consumer directed care approaches. Traditionally, consumer directed care models have been implemented in home care services and there is little guidance as to how to implement them in residential care. This study used a citizens’ jury to elicit views of members of the public regarding consumer directed care in residential care. Methods: A citizens’ jury involving 12 members of the public was held over two days in July 2016, exploring the question: For people with dementia living in residential care facilities, how do we enable increased personal decision making to ensure that care is based on their needs and preferences? Jury members were recruited through a market research company and selected to be broadly representative of the general public. Results: The jury believed that person-centred care should be the foundation of care for all older people. They recommended that each person’s funding be split between core services (to ensure basic health, nutrition and hygiene needs are met) and discretionary services. Systems needed to be put into place to enable the transition to consumer directed care including care coordinators to assist in eliciting resident preferences, supports for proxy decision makers, and accreditation processes and risk management strategies to ensure that residents with significant cognitive impairment are not taken advantage of by goods and service providers. Transparency should be increased (perhaps using technologies) so that both the resident and nominated family members can be sure that the person is receiving what they have paid for. Conclusions: The views of the jury (as representatives of the public) were that people in residential care should have more say regarding the way in which their care is provided and that a model of consumer directed care should be introduced. Policy makers should consider implementation of consumer directed care models that are economically viable and are associated with high levels of satisfaction among users.Kate Laver, Emmanuel Gnanamanickam, Craig Whitehead, Susan Kurrle, Megan Corlis, Julie Ratcliffe, Wendy Shulver and Maria Crott