Stroke Ready: a multi-level program that combines implementation science and community-based participatory research approaches to increase acute stroke treatment: protocol for a stepped wedge trial

Abstract Background Post-stroke disability is common, costly, and projected to increase. Acute stroke treatments can substantially reduce post-stroke disability, but few patients take advantage of these cost-effective treatments. Practical, cost-efficient, and sustainable interventions to address underutilized acute stroke treatments are currently lacking. In this context, we present the Stroke Ready project, a stepped wedge design, multi-level intervention that combines implementation science and community-based participatory research approaches to increase acute stroke treatments in the predominately African American community of Flint, Michigan, USA. Methods Guided by the Tailored Implementation of Chronic Disease (TICD) framework, we begin with optimization of acute stroke care in emergency departments, with particular attention given to our safety-net hospital partners. Then, we move to a community-wide, multi-faceted, stroke preparedness intervention, with workshops led by peer educators, over 2 years. Measures of engagement of the safety-net hospital and the feasibility and sustainability of the implementation strategy as well as community intervention reach, dose delivered, and satisfaction will be collected. The primary outcome is acute stroke treatment rates, which includes both intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, and endovascular treatment. The co-secondary outcomes are intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment rates and the proportion of stroke patients who arrive by ambulance. Discussion If successful, Stroke Ready will increase acute stroke treatment rates through emergency department and community level interventions. The stepped wedge design and process evaluation will provide insight into how Stroke Ready works and where it might work best. By exploring the relative effectiveness of the emergency department optimization and the community intervention, we will inform hospitals and communities as they determine how best to use their resources to optimize acute stroke care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Identifier NCT03645590 .https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148211/1/13012_2019_Article_869.pd

Extending Advance Care Planning to Black Americans in the Community: A Pilot Study of the PREPARE Program

ContextAdvance care planning (ACP) is underutilized, especially among Black Americans. Yet, no ACP interventions have been tested at the community level.ObjectivesWithin an established academic and community partnership, we sought to determine whether ACP is a community-identified need and if so, to conduct a pilot study of an evidence-based ACP program, PREPARE (PrepareForYourCare.org).MethodsWe conducted open discussions and in-depth interviews to determine the relevance of ACP to the community. We then conducted a pre- to 3-week postpilot study of a virtual peer facilitated brief session to introduce ACP and encourage participants to engage with PREPARE. We conducted thematic content analysis for qualitative data and used paired t-tests to assess within-participant changes in the validated ACP Engagement Survey measured on a 1-5 scale (5 = greatest engagement).ResultWe conducted two discussion groups with community leaders (n = 12) and key informant interviews (n = 6), including leaders in aging, public health, health care and faith. We concluded that ACP is a community priority. In the pilot study, we enrolled 13 Black Americans; 85% were women and the mean age was 59.7 years (SD 15.1). There was a trend toward increased ACP engagement after the peer facilitated PREPARE (mean 3.2 (SD 0.6) pre vs. 3.5 (SD 0.6) post, paired t-test P = 0.06). All participants found the intervention to be acceptable and were satisfied with it.ConclusionCommunity members identified ACP as important for their community. Peer facilitated PREPARE program is a promising community-based strategy to increase engagement in ACP and may promote health equity

A step toward understanding the mechanism of action of audit and feedback: a qualitative study of implementation strategies

Abstract Background Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy. Understanding mechanisms of action of A&F increases the likelihood that the strategy will lead to implementation of an evidence-based practice. We therefore sought to understand one hospital’s experience selecting and implementing an A&F intervention, to determine the implementation strategies that were used by staff and to specify the mechanism of action of those implementation strategies using causal pathway models, with the ultimate goal of improving acute stroke treatment practices. Methods We selected an A&F strategy in a hospital, initially based on implementation determinants and staff consideration of their performance on acute stroke treatment measures. After 7 months of A&F, we conducted semi-structured interviews of hospital providers and administrative staff to understand how it contributed to implementing guideline-concordant acute stroke treatment (medication named tissue plasminogen activator). We coded the interviews to identify the implementation strategies that staff used following A&F and to assess their mechanisms of action. Results We identified five implementation strategies that staff used following the feedback intervention. These included (1) creating folders containing the acute stroke treatment protocol for the emergency department, (2) educating providers about the protocol for acute stroke, (3) obtaining computed tomography imaging of stroke patients immediately upon emergency department arrival, (4) increasing access to acute stroke medical treatment in the emergency department, and (5) providing additional staff support for implementation of the protocol in the emergency department. We identified enablement, training, and environmental restructuring as mechanisms of action through which the implementation strategies acted to improve guideline-concordant and timely acute stroke treatment. Conclusions A&F of a hospital’s acute stroke treatment practices generated additional implementation strategies that acted through various mechanisms of action. Future studies should focus on how initial implementation strategies can be amplified through internal mechanisms.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173845/1/13012_2021_Article_1102.pd