Patient Perceptions of Effectiveness in Treatments for Menière's Disease: a National Survey in Italy

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate current treatment practices and self-reported effectiveness in Menière's disease. Materials and Methods: Members of two Italian Menière's disease support (n=170) with ≥6-month history of Menière's disease were administered an online survey about recent treatments. Vertigo episode count, work absenteeism, and limitations in family life, social life,work or travel, as included in the Social Life and Work Impact of Dizziness (SWID) Questionnaire before and after recent treatments were queried. Results: Twenty-four different treatments were reported for Menière's disease, with dietary modifications (55%), diuretics (47%), and betahistine (41%) being most common. The majority (71%) received multiple simultaneous treatments. Prior to the most recent treatments 78-89% of respondents indicated limitations in family or social life, work or traveling. After their most recent treatment, respondents reported improvements in mean vertigo episode counts (5.7±7.6 vs. 2.6 ±4.6, p<0.001), days off work per month (10.1 ±9.2 vs. 4.2 ±6.7, p<0.001), and proportions indicating limitations in any functional measure assessed (p<0.05). These findings were consistent regardless of treatment approach (all p<0.05). Intratympanic gentamicin provided the greatest reductions in vertigo count, functional limitations, and work absenteeism (all p<0.01) as well as the fewest respondents reporting post-treatment functional limitations (16-37%). Conclusions: Despite numerous treatment approaches targeting different proposed pathophysiology for Menière's disease in this cross-sectional survey, all treatments are reported as effective by patients. These findings support a prominent placebo effect in Menière's disease and highlight challenges in studying treatment outcomes; there is a critical need to better understand Menière's disease

Responsiveness to sensory cues using the Timed Up and Go test in patients with Parkinson's disease: a prospective cohort study.

Objective: To test the effectiveness of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test to define responsiveness to auditory and visual cues in patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods: Consecutive patients > 50 years old were enrolled if they were classified as stage 1–3 of the Hoehn and Yahr scale; scored ≤ 45 on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; > 23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination; and were able to perform the TUG test without assistance. Within-subject analysis identified positive-responders, negative-responders and non-responders. TUG times with and without sensory cues were studied among all patients, and among responders only using the Friedman Test. Results: Twenty-two patients (16 men, 6 women), mean age 72.4 years (standard deviation (SD) 8.7 years) were included. Basal mean TUG time was 12.3 (SD 4.0). TUG times after visual cues (11.7 (SD 4.8)) were lower than in basal conditions (p = 0.006), whereas TUG times after auditory cues were not (p > 0.05). In the 16 patients who were positive-responders, mean TUG times after visual (11.0 (SD 3.1)) and auditory (11.3 (SD 3.6)) cues were lower than in basal conditions (12.5 (SD 3.8)) (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: The TUG test may be used to tailor the rehabilitation programme in patients with Parkinson's disease, identifying those who respond to visual and auditory cueing

The psychological impact of prolonged disorders of consciousness on caregivers:a systematic review of quantitative studies

Objective: Systematic review of the nature, frequency and severity of psychological experiences of people who have a close relationship with a person with a prolonged disorder of consciousness. Data sources: Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase®, MEDLINE®, Allied and Complementary Medicine™, were searched from inceptions until December 2016 with additional hand searching of reference lists of included articles. Review methods: Studies were included that used quantitative methodologies and psychological measures to investigate experiences. The PRISMA statement was followed with inclusion criteria set a priori. A data synthesis summarized psychological constructs studied. Results: A total of 18 studies (ranging between n = 16–487 participants) met the inclusion criteria with 15 of 18 studies focused on the primary caregiver. A total of 23 standardized psychological measures were identified to assess four primary psychological constructs: Loss and grief, psychological wellbeing changes, burden and use of coping strategies. Conclusions: Small sample sizes, limited variables and reliance on observational methods affected quality. Caregivers do find ways to manage independently, but some exhibit clinically significant psychological distress that does not change over time alone and may get worse

Stress ossidativo nei pazienti con diagnosi di sindrome delle apnee ostruttive notturne

La Sindrome delle Apnee Ostruttive Notturne (OSAS) è una patologia caratterizzata da alterazioni metaboliche e da un elevato rischio di sviluppo di patologie cardiovascolari. Lo scopo dello studio è stato quello di identificare dei markers precoci predittivi di rischio cardiovascolare con la valutazione dello stress ossidativo misurato attraverso esami di laboratorio in soggetti normali e pazienti con diagnosi di sindrome delle apnee ostruttive notturne. È stato effettuato uno studio prospettico per confrontare i risultati di laboratorio ottenuti dalla valutazione dei biomarkers dello stress ossidativo in 20 pazienti adulti con OSAS e 20 soggetti sani. Le tecniche di analisi utilizzate avevano l’obiettivo di identificare e quantificare i danni dei radicali liberi attraverso la misurazione di anti-ossidanti e pro-ossidanti in modo da valutare l’equilibrio ossidativo presente nei due gruppi di studio. I due gruppi di pazienti sono risultati omogeni per sesso, età ed indice di massa corporea (p < 0,05). Una differenza statisticamente significativa è stata individuata tra i livelli di indice di apnea-ipopnea valutata alla polisonnografia e di isoprostani, produzione di proteine di ossidazione e proteine non legate al ferro nei due gruppi in esame. Nessuna differenza significativa è stata trovata nel livello dei tioli tra i soggetti sani e i pazienti con sindrome delle apnee ostruttive. I tioli, a differenza degli altri markers, sono molecole anti-ossidanti, i restanti sono invece espressione di danno ossidativo. I risultati dello studio indicano che i biomarkers potrebbero essere utilizzati come indici di ostruzione delle vie aeree superiori (VAS) e come marcatori precoci di ipossiemia causando processi flogistici ricorrenti e danno locale da radicali liberi a carico delle VAS

p 207clinico pathological and molecular characterization of braf mutant metastatic colorectal cancer mcrc are all mutations created equal

n/

Systemic Treatment of Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Outbreak : COVID-19-adapted Recommendations of the National Cancer Institute of Milan

The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak poses a major challenge in the treatment decision-making of patients with cancer, who may be at higher risk of developing a severe and deadly SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population. The health care emergency is forcing the reshaping of the daily assessment between risks and benefits expected from the administration of immune-suppressive and potentially toxic treatments. To guide our clinical decisions at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Lombardy region, the epicenter of the outbreak in Italy), we formulated Coronavirus-adapted institutional recommendations for the systemic treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Here, we describe how our daily clinical practice has changed due to the pandemic outbreak, with the aim of providing useful suggestions for physicians that are facing the same challenges worldwide

Systemic Treatment of Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Outbreak: COVID-19-adapted Recommendations of the National Cancer Institute of Milan

The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak poses a major challenge in the treatment decision-making of patients with cancer, who may be at higher risk of developing a severe and deadly SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population. The health care emergency is forcing the reshaping of the daily assessment between risks and benefits expected from the administration of immune-suppressive and potentially toxic treatments. To guide our clinical decisions at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Lombardy region, the epicenter of the outbreak in Italy), we formulated Coronavirus-adapted institutional recommendations for the systemic treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Here, we describe how our daily clinical practice has changed due to the pandemic outbreak, with the aim of providing useful suggestions for physicians that are facing the same challenges worldwide

lba22negative hyper selection of ras wild type wt metastatic colorectal cancer mcrc patients randomized to first line folfox plus panitumumab pan followed by maintenance therapy with either 5fu lv plus pan or single agent pan translational analyses of the valentino study

n/