Should vascular wall F-18-FDG uptake be adjusted for the extent of atherosclerotic burden?

Vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake is often used as a surrogate marker of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. A potential caveat is that vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake is higher simply because more atherosclerosis is present. To determine if the degree of inflammation is high or low relative to the extent of atherosclerosis, vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake may require statistical adjustment for a non-inflammatory marker reflecting the extent of atherosclerosis, e.g. calcification. Adjustments is probably needed if (1) vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake correlates sufficiently strongly with arterial calcification and (2) adjustment for extent of calcification affects determinants of vascular 18F-FDG uptake. This study addresses these questions. 18F-FDG PET/low-dose-CT scans of 99 patients were used. Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed and PET/CT scans were analysed for standardized 18F-FDG uptake values and calcification. ANOVA was used to establish the association between vascular 18F-FDG uptake and calcification. Multiple linear regression (with and without calcification as independent variable) was used to show whether determinants of vascular 18F-FDG uptake were affected by the degree of calcification. 18F-FDG uptake was related to increased calcification in the aortic arch, descending and abdominal aorta. However, 18F-FDG uptake showed considerable overlap between categories of calcification. Age and body mass index were main determinants of vascular 18F-FDG uptake. In multiple regression analyses, most standardized beta coefficients of these determinants were not affected by adjustment for the degree of calcification. Although vascular 18F-FDG uptake is related to total atherosclerotic burden, as reflected by vascular calcification, the association is weak and unlikely to affect the identification of determinants of atherosclerotic inflammation implicating no need for adjustment in future studies

Observer Variation of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography in Mediastinal Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer as a Function of Experience, and its Potential Clinical Impact

Purpose: To test the extent of variation among nuclear medicine physicians with respect to staging non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography (PET). Procedures: Two groups of nuclear medicine physicians with different levels of PET experience reviewed 30 PET scans. They were requested to identify and localize suspicious mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) using standardized algorithms. Results were compared between the two groups, between individuals, and with expert reading. Results: Overall we found good interobserver agreement (kappa 0.65). Experience with PET translated into a better ability to localize MLN stations (68 % vs. 51%, respectively), and experienced readers appeared to be more familiar with translating PET readings into clinically useful statements. Conclusions: Although our results suggest that clinical experience with PET increases observers _ ability to read and interpret results from PET adequately, there is room for improvement. Experience with PET does not necessarily improve the accuracy of image interpretation

FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out, interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations, but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information

Reduced parahippocampal and lateral temporal GABA(A)-[C-11]flumazenil binding in major depression: preliminary results

Purpose: Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been related to both a dysfunctional γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) system and to hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). Although GABA has been suggested to inhibit HPA axis activity, their relationship has never been studied at the level of the central GAB

Nieuwe beeldvormende technieken bij de diagnostiek van het prostaatcarcinoom

In this article imaging techniques are discussed in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and future developments are highlighted. The nowadays preferred new imaging techniques (prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) detect metastases that would have remained unnoticed with traditional techniques (bone scan and computed tomography (CT)). This leads to practical dilemma’s in clinical practice, because scientific insights so far are based on the results of studies using old imaging techniques for staging. This dilemma is not solved until the diagnostic accuracy of the new imaging techniques and the consequences of the early detection of metastases are clear

The performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in small solitary pulmonary nodules

Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN, intraparenchymal lung mass <3 cm) is often a diagnostic challenge. This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in radiologically indeterminate SPN ≤10 mm on spiral CT. Between August 1997 and March 2001, we identified all patients with radiologically indeterminate SPNs ≤10 mm who were referred for FDG PET imaging at the VU University Medical Centre. All PET scans were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. PET was considered positive in cases with at least moderately enhanced focal uptake, and otherwise as negative. Lesions were considered benign on the basis of histology, no growth during 1.5 years or disappearance within at least 6 months. Thirty-five patients with 36 SPNs ≤10 mm in diameter at clinical presentation were identified (one patient had two metachronous lesions). In 13 of 14 malignant nodules and in two of 22 benign nodules, diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Prevalence of malignancy was 39%. PET imaging correctly identified 30 of 36 small lesions. One lesion proved to be false negative on PET (CT: 10 mm), and in five lesions, PET scans proved to be false positive. Specificity was 77% (17/22; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92), sensitivity 93% (13/14; 95% CI: 0.66-1.0), positive predictive value 72% (13/18; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90) and negative predictive value 94% (17/18; 95% CI: 0.73-1.0). This retrospective study suggests that FDG PET imaging could be a useful tool in differentiating benign from malignant SPNs ≤10 mm in diameter at clinical presentation. Such results may help in the design of larger prospective trials with structured clinical work-up

Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules: Validation and added value of18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

Background: The added value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning as a function of pretest risk assessment in indeterminate pulmonary nodules is still unclear. Objective: To obtain an external validation of the prediction model according to Swensen and colleagues, and to quantify the potential added value of FDC-PET scanning as a function of its operating characteristics in relation to this prediction model, in a population of patients with radiologically indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Design, setting, and patients: Between August 1997 and March 2001, all patients with an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule who had been referred for FDG-PET scanning were retrospectively identified from the database of the PET center at the VU University Medical Center. Results: One hundred six patients were eligible for the study, and 61 patients (57%) proved to have malignant nodules. The goodness-of-fit statistic for the model (according to Swensen) indicated that the observed proportion of malignancies did not differ from the predicted proportion (p = 0.46). PET scan results, which were classified using the 4-point intensity scale reading, yielded an area under the evaluated receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.91). The estimated difference of 0.095 (95% CI, -0.003 to 0.193) between the PET scan results classified using the 4-point intensity scale reading and the area under the curve (AUC) from the Swensen prediction was not significant (p = 0.058). The PET scan results, when added to the predicted probability calculated by the Swensen model, improves the AUC by 13.6% (95% CI, 6 to 21; p = 0.0003). Conclusion: The clinical prediction model of Swensen et al was proven to have external validity. However, especially in the lower range of its estimates, the model may underestimate the actual probability of malignancy. The combination of visually read FDG-PET scans and pretest factors appears to yield the best accuracy