Efficacy of acupuncture and electroacupuncture in patients with nonspecific low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract\ud \ud Background\ud Previous studies have shown that acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA) are effective in the treatment of patients with low back pain. However, there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of acupuncture and electroacupuncture in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.\ud \ud \ud Methods/design\ud The study design is a randomized controlled trial. Patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain of more than three months duration are recruited at Rehabilitation Center of Taboao da Serra - SP (Brazil). After examination, sixty-six patients will be randomized into one of two groups: acupuncture group (AG) (n = 33) and electroacupuncture group (EG) (n = 33). Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 6 weeks. The primary clinical outcomes will be pain intensity as measured and functional disability. Secondary outcomes: quality of pain, quality of life. perception of the overall effect, depressive state, flexibility and kinesiophobia. All the outcomes will be assessed will be assessed at baseline, at treatment end, and three months after treatment end. Significance level will be determined at the 5 % level. Results of this trial will help clarify the value of acupuncture and electroacupuncture as a treatment for chronic low back pain and if they are different.\ud \ud \ud Discussion\ud Results of this trial will help clarify the value of acupuncture needling and electroacupuncture stimulation of specific points on the body as a treatment for chronic low back pain.\ud \ud \ud Trial Registration\ud Clinicaltrials.gov: \ud NCT02039037\ud \ud . Register October 30, 2013.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-(CAPES

Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

BackgroundDisorders affecting the nervous system are diverse and include neurodevelopmental disorders, late-life neurodegeneration, and newly emergent conditions, such as cognitive impairment following COVID-19. Previous publications from the Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor Study estimated the burden of 15 neurological conditions in 2015 and 2016, but these analyses did not include neurodevelopmental disorders, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, or a subset of cases of congenital, neonatal, and infectious conditions that cause neurological damage. Here, we estimate nervous system health loss caused by 37 unique conditions and their associated risk factors globally, regionally, and nationally from 1990 to 2021.MethodsWe estimated mortality, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), years of life lost (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), with corresponding 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs), by age and sex in 204 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2021. We included morbidity and deaths due to neurological conditions, for which health loss is directly due to damage to the CNS or peripheral nervous system. We also isolated neurological health loss from conditions for which nervous system morbidity is a consequence, but not the primary feature, including a subset of congenital conditions (ie, chromosomal anomalies and congenital birth defects), neonatal conditions (ie, jaundice, preterm birth, and sepsis), infectious diseases (ie, COVID-19, cystic echinococcosis, malaria, syphilis, and Zika virus disease), and diabetic neuropathy. By conducting a sequela-level analysis of the health outcomes for these conditions, only cases where nervous system damage occurred were included, and YLDs were recalculated to isolate the non-fatal burden directly attributable to nervous system health loss. A comorbidity correction was used to calculate total prevalence of all conditions that affect the nervous system combined.FindingsGlobally, the 37 conditions affecting the nervous system were collectively ranked as the leading group cause of DALYs in 2021 (443 million, 95% UI 378–521), affecting 3·40 billion (3·20–3·62) individuals (43·1%, 40·5–45·9 of the global population); global DALY counts attributed to these conditions increased by 18·2% (8·7–26·7) between 1990 and 2021. Age-standardised rates of deaths per 100 000 people attributed to these conditions decreased from 1990 to 2021 by 33·6% (27·6–38·8), and age-standardised rates of DALYs attributed to these conditions decreased by 27·0% (21·5–32·4). Age-standardised prevalence was almost stable, with a change of 1·5% (0·7–2·4). The ten conditions with the highest age-standardised DALYs in 2021 were stroke, neonatal encephalopathy, migraine, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, diabetic neuropathy, meningitis, epilepsy, neurological complications due to preterm birth, autism spectrum disorder, and nervous system cancer.InterpretationAs the leading cause of overall disease burden in the world, with increasing global DALY counts, effective prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation strategies for disorders affecting the nervous system are needed

Effectiveness of electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Introdução: A dor lombar crônica inespecífica é um importante problema de saúde e de ordem socioeconômica responsável por alto índice de absenteísmo no trabalho e redução do desempenho funcional. A utilização da acupuntura manual como terapia alternativa no tratamento de dor lombar e a eletroacupuntura para potencializar o tratamento, tem se mostrado eficaz, entretanto, com poucas evidências sobre sua efetividade. Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade da eletroacupuntura versus acupuntura manual no tratamento da dor e incapacidade funcional em pacientes com dor lombar crônica inespecífica Método: Sessenta e seis pacientes com dor lombar crônica inespecífica foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: Grupo eletroacupuntura (GE n=33) e grupo acupuntura (GA n=33). Os desfechos clínicos primários foram dor, avaliada com a escala numérica de dor e incapacidade funcional pelo questionário de Incapacidade Roland Morris e os desfechos secundários foram: qualidade da dor medida com o questionário McGill de dor, percepção global com escala da percepção do efeito global, qualidade de vida por meio do Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), depressão com o inventário Beck de Depressão, e cinesiofobia com a Escala Tampa de Cinesiofobia. Os grupos foram tratados duas vezes por semana com duração de 40 minutos, durante seis semanas, totalizando 12 sessões. Foram realizadas três avaliações: inicial, final e follow-up de três meses. O nível de significância foi de alfa < 0,05. Resultados: Ambos os grupos relataram melhora na intensidade da dor e incapacidade funcional, sem diferença entre os grupos. Na intensidade e incapacidade escores de dor entre os grupos foram -0,4 (95% intervalo de confiança [IC] = -1,7 a -0,8) e -2,5 pontos (IC 95% = -5,6 a 0,6), respectivamente. Nos desfechos secundários, observamos uma diferença entre grupos apenas para cinesiofobia (diferença = -4.1 pontos, IC95% = -7,0 a -1,1) no grupo acupuntura manual. Conclusão: A eletroacupuntura e a acupuntura manual são eficazes na melhora da dor e incapacidade funcional em pacientes com dor lombar crônica inespecíficaIntroduction: Chronic nonspecific low back pain is significant problem of health and socioeconomic order responsible for high rate of absenteeism at work and reduced functional performance. The use of manual acupuncture as an alternative therapy in the treatment of low back pain and electroacupuncture to enhance the treatment has been proven effective, however, with little evidence of effectiveness. Objective: Compare the effectiveness of electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods: Sixty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain were divided into: electroacupuncture (n=33) and acupuncture group (n=33). The primary clinical outcomes were pain, assessed with the numerical Scale of Pain and functional disability by questionnaire Disability Roland Morris and secondary outcomes were quality of pain measure with the McGill Pain Questionnaire, global perception with the perception of the Global Scale Effect, quality of life through the Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF- 36), depression with the Beck depression inventory, and kinesiophobia with Tampa Scale kinesiophobia. The groups were treated twice a week lasting 40 minutes for six weeks, 12 sessions. Were three evaluations: baseline, post treatment and follow-up of three months. The level of significance was alfa < 0.05. Results: Both groups reported improvements in pain intensity and disability with no difference between groups. Differences in intensity and disability scores of pain between groups were -0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.7 to - 0.8) and -2.5 points (95% CI = -5 6 to 0.6), respectively. Regarding secondary outcomes, we observed a difference between-groups for kinesiophobia (difference= -4.1 points, 95% CI - 7.0 -1.1) in acupuncture group. Conclusion: Electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture have similar efficacy in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pai

Desempenho anaeróbio e características antropométricas de jogadores de futebol americano de uma equipe Brasileira / Anaerobic performance and anthropometric characteristics of American Football Players of a Brazilian Team

O presente estudo teve como objetivos: a) analisar indicadores anaeróbios e antropométricos em jogadores amadores de futebol americano (FA) e, b) comparar os indicadores anaeróbios e antropométricos entre as posições de ataque e defesa. Foram avaliados 44 jogadores amadores de FA. Os jogadores foram divididos em dois grupos: Ataque (GA: n= 21) e Defesa (GD: n= 23). Foram realizadas medidas de estatura, peso, índice de massa corporal (IMC) e percentual de gordura (%G) estimada por bioimpedância. Foram medidos parâmetros anaeróbios pelo teste de RAST (potência máxima: Pmax; potência média: PM; índice de fadiga: IF), salto vertical e corrida de 20m. Foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre as posições para peso, IMC e %G. Observou-se que o GA é mais pesado do que o GD (p<0,05). Foram encontradas diferenças para PM absoluta e IF entre os grupos GD e GA. Houve diferença no desempenho de 20m, sendo os jogadores que ocupam a posição wide receiver mais rápidos em relação aos outros jogadores. Conclui-se que existe diferença em parâmetros anaeróbios e antropométricos entre as posições dos jogadores de FA. Anaerobic performance and anthropometric characteristics of American Football Players of a Brazilian Team This study aimed to: a) analyze anaerobic and anthropometric indicators in amateur American football players (AF), and b) to compare the anaerobic and anthropometric indicators between the positions of attack and defense. Forty four (44) amateur players in AF were evaluated. The players were divided into two groups: Attack (AG: n=2) and Defense (DG: n = 23) . Measures of height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat (% BF) estimated by bioimpedance were performed. Anaerobic parameters were measured by RAST test (maximum power: Pmax, mean power: MP; fatigue index: IF), vertical jump and 20-m running. Significant differences were found between positions for weight, BMI and % BF It was observed that AG is heavier than DG (p < 0.05). Absolute differences between the IF and MP DG and AG groups were found. Differences in performance of 20-m, with players occupying the Wide Receiver position being faster compared to other players. We may conclude that there are differences in anaerobic and anthropometric parameters between the positions of the AF players

Effect of a telerehabilitation exercise program versus a digital booklet with self-care for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up

Abstract Background Neck pain is the fourth worldwide leading cause of disability and represents 22% of musculoskeletal disorders. Conservative intervention has been strongly recommended to treat chronic neck pain and Telerehabilitation is the alternative for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. There is a lack of high-quality research on the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with neck pain and functional disability. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of a telerehabilitation exercise program versus a digital booklet only with self-care information in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain. Methods This is a prospectively registered, assessor-blinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing a telerehabilitation exercise program versus a digital booklet with self-care information. Seventy patients will be recruited with non-specific chronic neck pain. Follow-ups will be conducted post-treatment, 6 weeks, and 3 months after randomization. The primary outcome will be disability at post-treatment (6 weeks) measured using neck pain disability. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity levels, global perceived effect, self-efficacy, quality of life, kinesiophobia, and adherence to treatment. In our hypothesis, patients allocated to the intervention group experience outcomes that are similar to those of those assigned to the self-care digital booklet. Our hypothesis can then be approved or disapproved based on the results of the study. Discussion This randomized clinical trial will provide reliable information on the use of telerehabilitation to treat patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (number: RBR-10h7khvk). Registered on 16 September 2022

Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Introduction Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP.Methods and analysis We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019138074