30 research outputs found

    Early antibody response in healthcare professionals after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2)

    Get PDF
    Data on the immune response after two doses of BNT162b2 are so far limited. Previously infected individuals were excluded from pivotal clinical trials and the optimal dose regimen in this population has not been clearly studied. The CRO-VAX HCP study aims at investigate the early antibody response in a population of healthcare professionals having received two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The CRO-VAX HCP study is a multicenter, prospective, interventional study conducted in several sites in Belgium. The study included 231 healthcare professional volunteers who received the two-dose regimen of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 73 were previously infected by SARS-CoV-2 and 158 were uninfected and seronegative. In the first group, blood samples were collected at baseline and after 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days. In the second group, samples were obtained at baseline and after 14 and 28 days. Antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and the receptor binding domain of the S1 subunit of the spike protein were measured in all individuals at different time points. In uninfected individuals, 95.5% (95% CI 91.0-98.2%) developed anti-spike antibodies after 14 days and a 24.9-fold rise (95% CI 21.4-28.9%) in antibody titer was observed after the second dose. In previously infected individuals, peak antibody response was reached after 7 days (i.e. 6,347 U/mL) and the second dose did not lead to significantly higher antibody titers (i.e. 8,856 to 11,911 U/mL). Antibody titers were higher in previously infected individuals. This study supports the concept that a single dose of BNT162b2 would be sufficient in previously infected individuals

    Peri-infection titers of neutralizing and binding antibodies as a predictor of COVID-19 breakthrough infections in vaccinated healthcare professionals:importance of the timing

    Get PDF
    The BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine is highly effective in reducing COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death. However, many subjects developed a breakthrough infection despite a full vaccination scheme. Since the waned efficacy of mRNA vaccines is correlated with the decrease of antibodies occurring over time, we aimed at evaluating whether lower levels of antibodies were associated with an increased risk of breakthrough infection in a cohort of breakthrough subjects that received three vaccine doses. Total binding antibodies against the RBD of the S1 subunit (Roche Diagnostics, Machelen, Belgium) and neutralizing antibodies using the Omicron B.1.1.529 variant pseudovirus were measured. Based on individual kinetic curves, the antibody titer of each subject was interpolated just before the breakthrough infection and compared to a matched-control group that did not develop a breakthrough infection. Lower levels of total binding and neutralizing antibodies were observed compared to the control group (6.900 [95% CI; 5.101-9.470] vs. 11.395 BAU/mL [8.627-15.050] [p=0.0301] and 26.6 [18.0-39.3] vs. 59.5 dilution titer [32.3-110] [p=0.0042], respectively). The difference between breakthrough and control subjects was mostly observed for neutralizing antibodies before three months after the homologous booster administration (46.5 [18.2-119] vs. 381 [285-509] [p=0.0156]). Considering the measurement of total binding antibodies before 3 months, there was no significant difference (p=0.4375). In conclusion, our results showed that subjects that developed a breakthrough infection had lower levels of neutralizing and total binding antibodies compared to controls. The difference was mostly noticeable considering neutralizing antibodies, especially for infections occurring before 3 months after the booster administration

    Stability of Concentrated Solution of Vancomycin Hydrochloride in Syringes for Intensive Care Units

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Vancomycin is increasingly administrated by continuous infusion. But the treatment of patient in intensive care need restricted volume to prevent fluid overload. The aim of the study was to evaluate the physical and chemical stability of solutions of a high concentration of vancomycin hydrochloride in 5 % glucose or 0.9 % NaCl. Methods Eight syringes of 50 mL, containing 41.66 mg/mL of vancomycin hydrochloride four syringes in 5 % glucose and four in 0.9 % NaCl were prepared and stored at ambient temperature during 48 h. Immediately after preparation and during 48 h, vancomycin hydrochloride concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Spectrophotometric absorbance at different wavelengths, pH measurement and microscopic observations were also performed. Results All solutions were physico-chemically stable during the whole period storage at ambient temperature: no color change, turbidity, precipitation or opacity, no significant pH variations or optic densities were observed in the solutions. Any crystals were seen by microscopic analysis. Solutions are considered chemically stable as the lower limit of the 95 % unilateral confidence interval on the mean remained above 90 % of the initial concentration for at least 48 h. Conclusions Solutions of vancomycin hydrochloride 41.66 mg/mL in syringe of 5 % glucose or 0.9 % NaCl are physically and chemically stable for at least 48 h when stored in syringes at ambient temperature. </jats:sec

    Factitious hypoglycemia : "a never-ending story"?

    No full text
    Our team of diabetologist is challenged by the case of a 41 year-old woman with recurrent hypoglycaemic episodes. Her clinical background was complex with, among others, a neuroendocrine tumor, a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and an adrenal insufficiency; these conditions require the exploration of several potential causes. After excluding an endogenous etiology, a factitious hypoglycemia was quicky suspected by clinicians. However, several venous samples showed normal insulinemia and a moderately decreased C-peptide. After multidisciplinary team discussion and facing a strong clinical suspicion, samples were sent to another laboratory to confirm the insulin results. Substantially supratherapeutics insulin concentrations were highlighted. This confirms the previous suspicion of surreptitious insulin administration with a recombinant form unrecognized by our routinely used analyzer. This observation leads us to briefly discuss the lack of cross-reactivities observed with many different insulin assays

    Microwave Freeze-thaw Technique for Injectable Drugs: A Review Updated from 1980 to 2021.

    No full text
    The objective of this review was to collect information and results about the method of the microwave freeze-thaw treatment of injectable drugs and whether the method can support the development of Centralized Intravenous Admixtures Services. A systematic review of the scientific literature about injectable drug stability studies was performed. The data are presented in a table, which describes the name of the drug, producer, final concentration, temperature and time of freezing storage, type of microwave oven, thawing power, method of dosage, and the results after treatment or final long-term storage at 5°C ± 3°C. From 1980 to 2021, 60 drugs were studied by the microwave freeze-thaw treatment, and the results were presented in 49 publications. Forty papers were presented by 8 teams (2 to 18 by team). The temperatures of freezing storage varied from -70°C to -10°C, the time storage from 4 hours to 12 months, and the thaw from low to full power. Drug concentrations were mainly determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Most of the 59 drugs were stable during and after treatment. Only three teams tested the long-term stability after the microwave freeze-thaw treatment, the first for ganciclovir after 7 days, the second for ceftizoxime after 30 days, and the third for 20 drugs after 11 to 70 days. This review can help Centralized Intravenous Additive Services take charge of the productions of ready-to-use injectable drugs

    Long-Term Stability Comparison between an Original and a Generic Version of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Dextrose 5% Infusion Polyolefin Bags at 5 ± 3 °C after Microwave Freeze-Thaw Treatment

    No full text
    Background: Piperacillin-Tazobactam is frequently infused in hospitals. The use of a generic version was considered after the out of stock of the brand name Tazocin®. The stability of 4 g of Tazocin® in 120mL of dextrose 5% (D5)was demonstrated during 35 days at 5 °C ± 3 °C after freezing (−20 °C) and microwave thawing (FMT). The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Tazocin® and a generic product in the same conditions. Methods: Five polyolefin bags of 4 g of Piperacillin/Tazobactam® Sandoz and 5 bags of 4 g of Tazocin® were prepared under aseptic conditions in 120mL of D5 and stored 3 months at 20 °C then thawed and stored 58 days at 5 ± 3 °C. Spectrophotometric absorbance at different wavelengths, pH measurement, visual and microscopic observations were also performed. The concentrations were measured by HPLC, at 211nm for tazobactam and 230nm for piperacilline. Results: No significant change in pH values or optic densities, no crystals were detected. The lower confidence limit at 95% of the concentration for the solutions remains superior to 90% of the initial concentration until 58 days of storage at 5 ± 3 °C

    Long-Term Stability Comparison between an Original and a Generic Version of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Dextrose 5 % Infusion Polyolefin Bags at 5 ± 3 °C after Microwave Freeze-Thaw Treatment

    No full text
    Piperacillin-Tazobactam is frequently infused in hospitals. The use of a generic version was considered after the out of stock of the brand name Tazocin®. The stability of 4 g of Tazocin® in 120 mL of dextrose 5 % (D5) was demonstrated during 35 days at 5 °C ± 3 °C after freezing (−20 °C) and microwave thawing (FMT). The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Tazocin® and a generic product in the same conditions

    Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review

    No full text
    Healthcare expenses are increasing, as is the utilization of laboratory resources. Despite this, between 20% and 40% of requested tests are deemed inappropriate. Improper use of laboratory resources leads to unwanted consequences such as hospital-acquired anemia, infections, increased costs, staff workload and patient stress and discomfort. The most unfavorable consequences result from unnecessary follow-up tests and treatments (overuse) and missed or delayed diagnoses (underuse). In this context, several interventions have been carried out to improve the appropriateness of laboratory testing. To date, there have been few published assessments of interventions specific to the intensive care unit. We reviewed the literature for interventions implemented in the ICU to improve the appropriateness of laboratory testing. We searched literature from 2008 to 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases between April and June 2023. Five intervention categories were identified: education and guidance (E&amp;G), audit and feedback, gatekeeping, computerized physician order entry (including reshaping of ordering panels), and multifaceted interventions (MFI). We included a sixth category exploring the potential role of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-based assisting tools in such interventions. E&amp;G-based interventions and MFI are the most frequently used approaches. MFI is the most effective type of intervention, and shows the strongest persistence of effect over time. AI/ML-based tools may offer valuable assistance to the improvement of appropriate laboratory testing in the near future. Patient safety outcomes are not impaired by interventions to reduce inappropriate testing. The literature focuses mainly on reducing overuse of laboratory tests, with only one intervention mentioning underuse. We highlight an overall poor quality of methodological design and reporting and argue for standardization of intervention methods. Collaboration between clinicians and laboratory staff is key to improve appropriate laboratory utilization. This article offers practical guidance for optimizing the effectiveness of an intervention protocol designed to limit inappropriate use of laboratory resources
    corecore