Expert United Kingdom consensus on the preservation of joint health in people with moderate and severe haemophilia A: A modified Delphi panel

Aim: For people with haemophilia A (PwHA), bleeding in the joints leads to joint damage and haemophilia-related arthropathy, impacting range of motion and life expectancy. Existing guidelines for managing haemophilia A support healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwHA in their efforts to preserve joint health. However, such guidance should be reviewed, considering emerging evidence and consensus as presented in this manuscript. Methods: Fifteen HCPs experienced in the management of PwHA in the UK participated in a three-round Delphi panel. Consensus was defined at ≥70% of panellists agreeing or disagreeing for Likert-scale questions, and ≥70% selecting the same option for multiple- or single-choice questions. Questions not reaching consensus were revised for the next round. Results: 26.8% (11/41), 44.8% (13/29) and 93.3% (14/15) of statements reached consensus in Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. HCPs agreed that prophylaxis should be offered to patients with a baseline factor VIII (FVIII) level of ≤5 IU/dL and that, where there is no treatment burden, the aim of prophylaxis should be to achieve a trough FVIII level ≥15 IU/dL and maintain a longer period with FVIII levels of ≥20-30 IU/dL to provide better bleed protection. The aspirational goal for PwHA is to prevent all joint bleeds, which may be achieved by maintaining normalised (50-150 IU/dL) FVIII levels. Conclusion: The panel of experts were largely aligned on approaches to preserving joint health in PwHA, and this consensus may help guide HCPs

Expert United Kingdom consensus on the preservation of joint health in people with moderate and severe haemophilia A: A modified Delphi panel

\ua9 2024 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Aim: For people with haemophilia A (PwHA), bleeding in the joints leads to joint damage and haemophilia-related arthropathy, impacting range of motion and life expectancy. Existing guidelines for managing haemophilia A support healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwHA in their efforts to preserve joint health. However, such guidance should be reviewed, considering emerging evidence and consensus as presented in this manuscript. Methods: Fifteen HCPs experienced in the management of PwHA in the UK participated in a three-round Delphi panel. Consensus was defined at ≥70% of panellists agreeing or disagreeing for Likert-scale questions, and ≥70% selecting the same option for multiple- or single-choice questions. Questions not reaching consensus were revised for the next round. Results: 26.8% (11/41), 44.8% (13/29) and 93.3% (14/15) of statements reached consensus in Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. HCPs agreed that prophylaxis should be offered to patients with a baseline factor VIII (FVIII) level of ≤5 IU/dL and that, where there is no treatment burden, the aim of prophylaxis should be to achieve a trough FVIII level ≥15 IU/dL and maintain a longer period with FVIII levels of ≥20–30 IU/dL to provide better bleed protection. The aspirational goal for PwHA is to prevent all joint bleeds, which may be achieved by maintaining normalised (50–150 IU/dL) FVIII levels. Conclusion: The panel of experts were largely aligned on approaches to preserving joint health in PwHA, and this consensus may help guide HCPs

Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action

Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neurovascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular safety. In the past, α-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic treatments of migraine include 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, Ca2+ channel blockers, and β-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused. In this review, we have discussed pharmacological targets in migraine, with special emphasis on compounds acting on 5-HT (5-HT1-7), adrenergic (α1, α2, and β), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP 1 and CGRP2), adenosine (A1, A2, and A3), glutamate (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptors. In addition, we have considered some other targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched upon

Obituary: Alexander Donald Abbot Russwurm 1904-2001

Volume: 15Start Page: 193End Page: 20

Occipital afferent activation of second order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex in rat

Stimulation of the greater occipital nerve produces excitation of second order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex. Given that neck pain is very common in primary headache disorders, this convergent excitation may play a role in pain referral from cervical structures. While previous studies have demonstrated a physiological model for this convergence, this study sought an anatomical approach to examine the distribution of second order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex receiving greater occipital nerve input. In addition, the role of glutamatergic NMDA receptor activation within the trigeminocervical complex in response to cervical afferents was studied. Noxious stimulation of the occipital muscle in rat using mustard oil and mineral oil produced significantly altered Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex compared with the surgical control (H-4 = 31.3, P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis). Baseline expression was 11 (median, range 4, 17) fos positive cells in the trigeminocervical complex, occipital muscle treated with mustard oil produced 23 (17, 33) and mineral oil a smaller effect of 19 (15, 25) fos positive cells, respectively (P = 0.046). The effects of both mustard and mineral oil were reversed by the NMDA-receptor antagonist MK801. This study introduces a model for examining trigeminocervical complex activity after occipital afferent stimulation in the rat that has good anatomical resolution and demonstrates involvement of glutamatergic NMDA receptors at this important synapse. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study

BACKGROUND: The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed and validated to detect arthropathy in children. Additional evidence is required to show validity in adults. We studied the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the HJHS version 2.1(HJHSv2.1) in adults with hemophilia. A secondary aim was to define age-related normative adult HJHSv2.1 reference values. METHODS: We studied 192 adults with hemophilia, and 120 healthy adults in four age-matched groups-18 to 29, 30 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50 years-at nine centers. Trained physiotherapists scored the HJHS and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) joint score. Health history, the Functional Independence Scale of Hemophilia (FISH), Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were also collected. RESULTS: The median age was 35.0 years. Of participants with hemophilia, 68% had severe, 14% moderate, and 18% mild disease. The HJHS correlated strongly with WFH score (Spearman's rho [rs ] = .95, P < .001). Moderate correlations were seen between the FISH (rs = .50, P < .001) and SF-MPQ Present Pain Intensity (rs = .50, P < .001), while a modest correlation was found with the HAL (rs = -.37, P < .001). The HJHS significantly differentiated between age groups (Kruskal-Wallis T = 35.02, P < .001) and disease severity in participants with hemophilia. The HJHS had high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .88). We identified duration of swelling as a redundant item in the HJHS. CONCLUSIONS: The HJHS shows evidence of strong convergent and discriminant construct validity to detect arthropathy in adults with hemophilia and is well suited for use in this population