Asupan Mikronutrien, Kadar Hemoglobin dan Kesegaran Jasmani Remaja Putri

Micronutrient intake, hemoglobin levels and physical fitness amongst female adolescentsBackground: Female adolescents is a group that is suspectible to anemia. Iron, zinc, copper, folic acid, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 intake are factors among others that influence hemoglobin level. People with anemia would have the low physical fitness. The objective of this study was to understand the association between micronutrient intake (iron, zinc, copper, folic acid, vitamin B6, vitamin B12) with hemoglobin level, and hemoglobin level with physical fitness of female adolescents.Method: The design of this study was a cross sectional and the number of subject were 40 chosen by simple random sampling from 10th and 11th grade students that fulfill the inclusion criteria. Data on nutrients intake were obtained using semi quantitative food frequencies. The hemoglobin level was measured by cyanmethaemoglobin method, whereas physical fitness level was measured byharvard step test.Results: There were 32 subjects (80%) categorized as having very low and low from physical fitness. There were 10 subjects (25%) anemic. Eight subjects had low from physical fitness. There were significant associations between iron, zinc, copper, folic acid and vitamin B6 intake with hemoglobin level. There were no significant association between vitamin B12 with hemoglobin level.Regression analysis showed that iron intake contributed 67.7% variant to hemoglobin level. There were no significant association between hemoglobin level with physical fitness after controlled by nutritional status and physical activity.Conclusion: Intake of Fe, Zn, Cu, folic acid and B6 are associated with hemoglobin level, but hemoglobin level is not associated with physical fitness

Insights into the strong in-vitro anticancer effects for bis(triphenylphosphane)iminium compounds having perchlorate, tetrafluoridoborate and bis(chlorido)argentate anions

Three new compounds containing the bis(triphenylphosphane)iminium cation (PPN+) with ClO4−, BF4− and [AgCl2]− as counter anions have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The two derivatives with ClO4− and BF4− were found to be isostructural by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, the three compounds show extremely potent antiproliferative effects against the human cancer cell line SKOV3. To gain insights into the possible mechanisms of biological action, several intracellular targets have been considered. Thus, DNA binding has been evaluated, as well as the effects of the compounds on the mitochondrial function. Furthermore, the compounds have been tested as possible inhibitors of the seleno-enzyme thioredoxin reductase

Use of the Alaskan Beaufort Sea by Bowhead Whales (Balaena mysticetus) Tagged with Satellite Transmitters, 2006 – 18

We used satellite telemetry to examine bowhead whale movement behavior, residence times, and dive behavior in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea, 2006 – 18. We explored the timing and duration of use of three subregions (western, central, eastern) within the Alaskan Beaufort Sea and applied a two-state switching state-space model to infer bowhead whale behavior state as either transiting or lingering. Transiting whales made direct movements whereas lingering whales changed direction frequently and were presumably feeding. In spring, whales migrated across the Alaskan Beaufort Sea in 7.17 ± 0.41 days, primarily off the continental shelf over deep water. During the autumn migration, whales spent over twice as much time crossing the Alaskan Beaufort Sea than in spring, averaging 18.66 ± 2.30 days, spending 10.05 ± 1.22 days in the western subregion near Point Barrow. Most whales remained on the shelf during the autumn migration and frequently dove to the seafloor, where they spent 45% of their time regardless of behavioral state. Consistent dive behavior in autumn suggests that the whales were looking for food while migrating, and the identification of lingering locations likely reflects feeding. The lack of lingering locations in the eastern and central subregions suggests that prey densities are rarely sufficient to warrant whales pausing their migration for multiple days, unlike in the western subregion near Point Barrow, where bowhead whales regularly lingered for long periods of time.À l’aide de la télémétrie satellitaire, nous avons examiné les comportements de déplacement des baleines boréales, leurs temps de séjour et leurs comportements de plongée dans les eaux alaskiennes de la mer de Beaufort entre 2006 et 2018. Nous avons exploré le moment et la durée d’utilisation de trois sous-régions (ouest, centre et est) des eaux alaskiennes de la mer de Beaufort et appliqué un modèle à changement binaire espace-état afin de déduire l’état du comportement des baleines boréales comme étant soit en mode transit, soit en mode flânerie. Les baleines en mode transit se déplaçaient de manière directe, tandis que celles en mode flânerie changeaient souvent de direction et étaient probablement en train de se nourrir. Au printemps, les baleines migraient dans les eaux alaskiennes de la mer de Beaufort en 7,17 ± 0,41 jours, principalement au large du plateau continental, dans les profondeurs. Durant la migration automnale, les baleines passaient plus de deux fois plus de temps à traverser les eaux alaskiennes de la mer de Beaufort qu’au printemps, en moyenne 18,66 ± 2,30 jours, passant 10,05 ± 1,22 jours dans la sous-région de l’ouest, près de Point Barrow. Pendant la migration automnale, la plupart des baleines restaient dans le plateau continental et plongeaient souvent jusqu’au plancher océanique, où elles passaient 45 % de leur temps, peu importe leur état de comportement. À l’automne, le comportement de plongée régulier suggère que les baleines étaient à la recherche de nourriture pendant leur migration, et les lieux où elles flânaient étaient vraisemblablement indicateurs d’un mode d’alimentation. L’absence de lieux de flânerie dans les sous-régions de l’est et du centre suggère que la densité des proies est rarement suffisante pour que les baleines justifient d’interrompre leur migration pendant plusieurs jours, contrairement à la sous-région de l’ouest, près de Point Barrow, où les baleines boréales flânaient régulièrement pendant de longues périodes

Ecological characteristics of core-use areas used by Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort (BCB) bowhead whales, 2006–2012

© The Author(s), 2014]. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Progress in Oceanography 136 (2015): 201-222, doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2014.08.012.The Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort (BCB) population of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) ranges across the seasonally ice-covered waters of the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas. We used locations from 54 bowhead whales, obtained by satellite telemetry between 2006 and 2012, to define areas of concentrated use, termed “core-use areas”. We identified six primary core-use areas and describe the timing of use and physical characteristics (oceanography, sea ice, and winds) associated with these areas. In spring, most whales migrated from wintering grounds in the Bering Sea to the Cape Bathurst polynya, Canada (Area 1), and spent the most time in the vicinity of the halocline at depths <75 m, which are within the euphotic zone, where calanoid copepods ascend following winter diapause. Peak use of the polynya occurred between 7 May and 5 July; whales generally left in July, when copepods are expected to descend to deeper depths. Between 12 July and 25 September, most tagged whales were located in shallow shelf waters adjacent to the Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula, Canada (Area 2), where wind-driven upwelling promotes the concentration of calanoid copepods. Between 22 August and 2 November, whales also congregated near Point Barrow, Alaska (Area 3), where east winds promote upwelling that moves zooplankton onto the Beaufort shelf, and subsequent relaxation of these winds promoted zooplankton aggregations. Between 27 October and 8 January, whales congregated along the northern shore of Chukotka, Russia (Area 4), where zooplankton likely concentrated along a coastal front between the southeastward-flowing Siberian Coastal Current and northward-flowing Bering Sea waters. The two remaining core-use areas occurred in the Bering Sea: Anadyr Strait (Area 5), where peak use occurred between 29 November and 20 April, and the Gulf of Anadyr (Area 6), where peak use occurred between 4 December and 1 April; both areas exhibited highly fractured sea ice. Whales near the Gulf of Anadyr spent almost half of their time at depths between 75 and 100 m, usually near the seafloor, where a subsurface front between cold Anadyr Water and warmer Bering Shelf Water presumably aggregates zooplankton. The amount of time whales spent near the seafloor in the Gulf of Anadyr, where copepods (in diapause) and, possibly, euphausiids are expected to aggregate provides strong evidence that bowhead whales are feeding in winter. The timing of bowhead spring migration corresponds with when zooplankton are expected to begin their spring ascent in April. The core-use areas we identified are also generally known from other studies to have high densities of whales and we are confident these areas represent the majority of important feeding areas during the study (2006–2012). Other feeding areas, that we did not detect, likely existed during the study and we expect core-use area boundaries to shift in response to changing hydrographic conditions.This study is part of the Synthesis of Arctic Research (SOAR) and was funded in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program through Interagency Agreement No. M11PG00034 with the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL). Funding for this research was mainly provided by U.S. Minerals Management Service (now Bureau of Ocean Energy Management) under contracts M12PC00005, M10PS00192, and 01-05-CT39268, with the support and assistance from Charles Monnett and Jeffery Denton, and under Interagency Agreement No. M08PG20021 with NOAA-NMFS and Contract No. M10PC00085 with ADF&G. Work in Canada was also funded by the Fisheries Joint Management Committee, Ecosystem Research Initiative (DFO), and Panel for Energy Research and Development