182 research outputs found
A Conceptualist View in the Metaphysics of Species
The species concept is one of the central concepts in biological science. Although modern systematics speculates about the existence of a complex hierarchy of nested taxa, biological species are considered particularly important for the active role they play in evolution. However, neither theoretical biologists nor philosophers of biology have come to an agreement about what a species is. In this chapter, we address two questions pertaining to biological species: (1) are they individuals or universals? and (2) are they bona fide or fiat entities? In section The Species-as-Individuals View, we illustrate the reasons that have led many scholars to support the view that species are individuals. In the next two sections, we show that the relational concepts of species – on which the species-as-individuals view is based –
provide neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for species membership. This seriously undermines the species-as-individuals view. In the section A Conceptualist Model for the Metaphysics of Species, we advance the proposal that species are fiat concepts (and thus, universal entities partially dependent on the human mind) carved in a multi-dimensional space representing the properties that the biological organisms possess. The final section concludes
A note on eternity
The timeless solution to the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom has many advantages. Still, the relationship between a timeless God and temporal beings is problematic in a number of ways. In this paper, we focus on the specific problems the timeless view has to deal with when certain assumptions on the metaphysics of time are taken on board. It is shown that on static conception of time God’s omniscience is easily accounted for, but human freedom is threatened, while a dynamic conception has no problems with human freedom, but, on this view, some truths seem not to be knowable by a timeless God. We propose Fragmentalism as a metaphysics of time in which the divine timeless knowledge of temporal events and human freedom can be reconciled
Refining OntoClean. Identity Criteria and Grounding
In this paper we introduce some logical and philosophical refinements
to OntoClean, first by developing some formal constraints on identity criteria, secondly
by specifying a kind of identity criteria, two level identity criteria, whose
role is to explain an identity among some entities referring to some other, more basic,
entities. Using such refinement we add a formal constraint to the stock of OntoClean
meta-constraints (OC+). We, then, observe that two level identity criteria
have an intuitive reading in terms of dependence of a kind of entities on some other
entities, possibly specified in terms of a grounding relation. Are identity criteria
grounding principles? In the second part of the paper we discuss this option
How to Say 'Yes' or 'No': Logical Approaches to Modes of Assertion and Denial
How to Say 'Yes' or 'No':
Logical Approaches to Modes of Assertion and Denial. Book of Abstracts
From thin objects to thin concepts?
In this short paper we consider Linnebo's thin/thick dichotomy: first, we show that it does not overlap with the very common one between abstract/concrete objects; second, on the basis of some difficulties with the distinction, we propose, as a possible way out, to move from thin/thick objects to thin/thick concepts
On assertion and denial in the logic for pragmatics
The aim of this paper is twofold: First, we present and develop a system of logic for pragmatics including the act of denial. Second, we analyse in our framework the so-called paradox of assertability. We show that it is possible to yield sentences that are not assertable. Moreover, under certain conditions, a symmetric result can be obtained: There is a specular paradox of deniability. However, this paradox is based on the problematic principle of classical denial equivalence
From thin objects to thin concepts?
International audienceIn this short paper we consider Linnebo's thin / thick dichotomy: first, we show that it does not overlap to the very common one between abstract / concrete objects; second, on the base on some difficulties of the distinction, we propose, as a possible way out, to move from thin / thick objects to thin / thick concepts
Fragmenting Modal Logic
Fragmentalism allows incompatible facts to constitute reality in an absolute manner, provided that they fail to obtain together. In recent years, the view has been extensively discussed, with a focus on its formalisation in model-theoretic terms. This paper focuses on three formalisations: Lipman’s approach, the subvaluationist interpretation, and a novel view that has been so far overlooked. The aim of the paper is to explore the application of these formalisations to the alethic modal case. This logical exploration will allow us to study (i) cases of metaphysical incompatibility between modal facts and (ii) cases of modal dialetheias. In turn, this will enrich our understanding of the role of impossibility in the fragmentalist framework
Fragmenting Modal Logic
Fragmentalism allows incompatible facts to constitute reality in an absolute
manner, provided that they fail to obtain together. In recent years, the view
has been extensively discussed, with a focus on its formalisation in modeltheoretic
terms. This paper focuses on three formalisations: Lipman’s
approach, the subvaluationist interpretation, and a novel view that has been
so far overlooked. The aim of the paper is to explore the application of these
formalisations to the alethic modal case. This logical exploration will allow us
to study (i) cases of metaphysical incompatibility between modal facts and
(ii) cases of modal dialetheias. In turn, this will enrich our understanding of
the role of impossibility in the fragmentalist framework
- …