R0, as a function of the field size for power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Hermiston 2002 experiment.

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Hermiston 2002 experiment. 1st column distance [m]; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 120x120 gridpoints, except for last 3 points with 180x180 grid. Plotted as points on solid red curve in Fig. 3. The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

R0, as a function of the field size for power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Madras 2002 experiment

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Madras 2002 experiment. 1st column distance [m]; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 120x120 gridpoints. Plotted as points on the dashed blue curve in Fig. 3. The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

Hermiston 2002 stripe rust disease gradient

This file contains the disease gradient data from Hermiston 2002 experiment for stripe rust on wheat. The experiments were reported in [Sackett, K. E., and C. C. Mundt. 2005. Primary disease gradients of wheat stripe rust in large field plots. Phytopathology 95:983–91.] 1st column: distance from the source of infection in feet. 2nd column: distance from the source of infection in meters. 3rd, 4th, 5th columns disease severity (percentage of leaf area infected) measurements in three replicate plots. This disease gradient is plotted in Figure 2(a)

R0 as a function of the field size for exponential dispersal kernel

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for exponential dispersal kernel. 1st column distance [m]; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 60x60 gridpoints. Plotted as solid curve in Fig. 1 (up to values of d of about 193 m). The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

Madras 2002 stripe rust disease gradient

This file contains the disease gradient data from Madras experiment for stripe rust on wheat. The experiments were reported in [Sackett, K. E., and C. C. Mundt. 2005. Primary disease gradients of wheat stripe rust in large field plots. Phytopathology 95:983–91.] 1st column: distance from the source of infection in feet. 2nd column: distance from the source of infection in meters. 3rd, 4th, 5th columns disease severity (percentage of leaf area infected) measurements in three replicate plots. This disease gradient is plotted in Figure 2(b)

Dose response dependence for stripe rust controlled by epoxiconazole

Dose response dependence for stripe rust controlled by the fungicide epoxiconazole (Opus). The data was reported in the Home Grown Cereal Authority (HGCA) report n. 488 "Fungicide performance on winter wheat" (Ref. Bounds et al 2012 in the manuscript), Figure 15. The first column represents the fungicide dose as a proportion of the full label rate. The second column represents severity of stripe rust as percentage of the total leaf area. The results are averages over the two consecutive seasons, 2008 and 2009. This data is plotted in Fig. 5(a) of the manuscript

basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for modified power law 2 dispersal kernel.

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for exponential dispersal kernel. 1st column distance [m]; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 120x120 gridpoints (d from 0 m to 100 m) 150x150 gridpoints (d from 110 m to 250 m). Plotted as dashed curve in Fig. 1. The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

R0 as a function of the field size for exponential dispersal kernel, large field sizes and higher spatial resolution

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field size for exponential dispersal kernel. 1st column distance [m]; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 150x150 gridpoints. Plotted as solid curve in Fig. 1 (up to values of d of about 193 m). The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

R0, as a function of the field aspect ratio for 4 ha field area, power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Hermiston 2002 experiment.

The file represents the basic reproductive number, R0, as a function of the field aspect ratio for 4 ha field area, power law 2 dispersal kernel, parameters for Hermiston 2002 experiment. 1st column field aspect ratio; 2nd column R0. Spatial grid 150x150 gridpoints. Plotted as points on the solid yellow curve in Fig.4(a). The data was generated by numerical solution of Eq. (6) in the manuscript

Appendix A. Positions and sizes of artificially inoculated foci and observation points for estimating disease prevalence in host patches of differing size.

Positions and sizes of artificially inoculated foci and observation points for estimating disease prevalence in host patches of differing size