Low-cost gel-filled microwell array device for screening marine microbial consortium

In order to exploit the microbes present in the environment for their beneficial resources, effective selection and isolation of microbes from environmental samples is essential. In this study, we fabricated a gel-filled microwell array device using resin for microbial culture. The device has an integrated sealing mechanism that enables high-density isolation based on the culture of microorganisms; the device is easily manageable, facilitating observation using bright-field microscopy. This low-cost device made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)/polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has 900 microwells (600 μm × 600 μm × 700 μm) filled with a microbial culture gel medium in glass slide-sized plates. It also has grooves for maintaining the moisture content in the micro-gel. The partition wall between the wells has a highly hydrophobic coating to inhibit microbial migration to neighboring wells and to prevent exchange of liquid substances. After being hermetically sealed, the device can maintain moisture in the agarose gels for 7 days. In the bacterial culture experiment using this device, environmental bacteria were isolated and cultured in individual wells after 3 days. Moreover, the isolated bacteria were then picked up from wells and re-cultured. This device is effective for the first screening of microorganisms from marine environmental samples

Conjugative Selectivity of Plasmids Is Affected by Coexisting Recipient Candidates

Most previous studies on plasmid conjugal transfer employed experimental setups with two strains: one as a donor and the other as a recipient. However, the results obtained sometimes failed to agree with observations obtained under natural environmental conditions or in a model microcosm using natural soil and water samples. Therefore, we consider that there is a “gap” in our understanding of plasmid behavior in the context of bacterial consortia that exist under the actual environmental conditions. In this study, we clearly showed that the conjugation selectivity of a plasmid can be affected by the recipient candidates existing around the donor strain by the use of a simplified experimental setup with one strain as the donor and two strains as recipients. These phenomena could not be explained by factors known to affect plasmid transfer as suggested by previous studies. Therefore, we suggest the presence of novel elements regulating plasmid transfer within consortia.Understanding the mechanisms underlying plasmid behavior under conditions of various environments is important to predict the fate of plasmids in nature. Most previous studies on plasmid transfer employed two strains: one as a donor and the other as a recipient. However, in natural environments, there are usually different recipient cells available to which plasmid can be transferred. In this study, to reveal the underlying mechanisms, we assessed the transferability of plasmids from one donor strain to either of two recipient candidates as the most simplified model. We used Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Pseudomonas resinovorans CA10dm4 as model hosts and pCAR1 (IncP-7), NAH7 (IncP-9), pB10 (IncP-1β), and R388 (IncW) as model plasmids. As expected, in most cases these plasmids were generally transferred more frequently to a recipient of the same species than to a recipient of a different one under conditions of liquid and filter mating, although NAH7 was transferred from P. resinovorans more frequently to P. putida than to P. resinovorans during filter mating. With the exception of pCAR1, which was less affected, the coexistence of other recipients enhanced the preferences of conjugative transfer to the same species. In particular, preferences corresponding to transfer from P. putida to a different recipient (P. resinovorans) were reduced by the presence of a coexisting same recipient (P. putida) during transfer of NAH7 in liquid and transfer of R388 in filter mating. We determined that large cell aggregates and substances secreted into culture supernatant were not responsible for this phenomenon. Overall, the results of this study suggest the existence of unknown factors determining optimal plasmid transfer to native recipients

MOESM1 of Thermophilic bacteria are potential sources of novel Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases

Additional file 1. Additional tables

Growth phase-dependent expression profiles of three vital H-NS family proteins encoded on the chromosome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and on the pCAR1 plasmid

Abstract Background H-NS family proteins are nucleoid-associated proteins that form oligomers on DNA and function as global regulators. They are found in both bacterial chromosomes and plasmids, and were suggested to be candidate effectors of the interaction between them. TurA and TurB are the predominantly expressed H-NS family proteins encoded on the chromosome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440, while Pmr is encoded on the carbazole-degradative incompatibility group P-7 plasmid pCAR1. Previous transcriptome analyses suggested that they function cooperatively, but play different roles in the global transcriptional network. In addition to differences in protein interaction and DNA-binding functions, cell expression levels are important in clarifying the detailed underlying mechanisms. Here, we determined the precise protein amounts of TurA, TurB, and Pmr in KT2440 in the presence and absence of pCAR1. Results The intracellular amounts of TurA and TurB in KT2440 and KT2440(pCAR1) were determined by quantitative western blot analysis using specific antibodies. The amount of TurA decreased from the log phase (~80,000 monomers per cell) to the stationary phase (~20,000 monomers per cell), while TurB was only detectable upon entry into the stationary phase (maximum 6000 monomers per cell). Protein amounts were not affected by pCAR1 carriage. KT2440(pCAR1pmrHis), where histidine-tagged Pmr is expressed under its original promotor, was used to determine the intracellular amount of Pmr, which was constant (~30,000 monomers per cell) during cell growth. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR demonstrated that the transcriptional levels of turA and turB were consistent with protein expression, though the transcriptional and translational profiles of Pmr differed. Conclusion The amount of TurB increases as TurA decreases, and the amount of Pmr does not affect the amounts of TurA and TurB. This is consistent with our previous observation that TurA and TurB play complementary roles, whereas Pmr works relatively independently. This study provides insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying reconstitution of the transcriptional network in KT2440 by pCAR1 carriage