Variation of Legionella spp. with Lake Depth and Season in Two Norwegian Drinking Water Sources

In Norway, placement of the water treatment plant intake within the lake hypolimnion is considered a hygienic barrier against pathogens of fecal origin. It is unclear, however, whether this practice provides a barrier against opportunistic pathogens such as Legionella. In this study, water samples were collected at 10 m depth intervals near the drinking water intakes of two lakes. Legionella and one of their common hosts, Acanthamoeba spp., were quantified using culture-based assays (Legionella pneumophila only) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). L. pneumophila and Acanthamoeba spp. were never detected by qPCR; Legionella spp., however, were present in all samples at concentrations ranging from 2.33 to 4.14 log10[copies/L] in lake A and from 2.69 to 4.27 log10[copies/L] in lake B. For most sampling months in both lakes, there was no significant difference between total bacteria and Legionella spp. concentrations at the intake depth versus those on the lake surface. The results of this limited investigation of two Norwegian water supplies suggest that placement of water treatment plant intakes within the hypolimnion may not afford a sufficient hygienic barrier against Legionella.publishedVersio

The benefits of flushing for mitigating Legionella spp. in non-chlorinated building plumbing systems

Flushing is a common corrective action recommended by Legionella management guidelines to remove stagnant water and replenish disinfectant. Due to water age and different local regulations, buildings may receive water with low or no residual disinfectant. In such situations, the evidence for flushing efficacy is often anecdotal, and the benefits are poorly quantified. Using a pilot-scale premise plumbing system, flushed shower outlets were evaluated against non-flushed outlets during simulated periods of both active and low water demand. Water and biofilm concentrations of total bacteria, Legionella spp., and Vermamoeba vermiformis were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR. Even after all outlets returned to active water demand, flushed shower outlets continued to have lower quantities of Legionella compared to non-flushed outlets for several days, but the decrease was of little practical benefit (<0.5 log10[copies/L]). During prolonged periods of low water demand, however, there was no apparent benefit to flushing. Total bacteria grew to stationary phase within 3 ± 1 days, while Legionella spp. took 12 ± 6 days, regardless of whether the pipes had recently been flushed or not. Flushing with hot or cold water had little to no effect on the concentrations of total bacteria and Legionella in pipe wall biofilms. Flushing with cold water (9.6 and 13.2°C) decreased total bacteria concentrations in the water by 0.96 and 1.00 log10[copies/L], respectively and by 1.27 and 1.74 log10[copies/L] with hot water (49 and 60°C, respectively) but the difference in Legionella spp. concentrations between flushing with cold (1.55 log10[copies/L] for both) and hot water (1.32 to 1.88 log10[copies/L], respectively) was negligible. This suggests that hot water flushing, even at 60°C, provides little or no added benefit for managing Legionella in non-chlorinated building plumbing systems versus cold water flushing. Finally, the immediate benefits of flushing in terms of reductions in total bacteria and Legionella in the water were comparable as well as the rates at which those populations recovered during post-flush or post-shower stagnation

Practical actions to strengthen capacity for deep-water research in Africa

While Africa's deep marine biodiversity offers economic prospects it also supports crucial ecosystem services and sustainable development is dependent on knowledge of these systems. Building understanding of deep-water ecosystems is key, but there are substantial discrepancies in countries' abilities to achieve this. Coinciding with the 2024 Ocean Decade Conference, the Challenger 150 African Network of Deep-water Researchers is pleased to release a report on “Practical Actions to Strengthen Capacity for Deep-water Research in Africa”. Through a series of online workshops, the ANDR brought together 98 individuals from 19 African nations to discuss challenges for deep-water research in Africa, identify solutions to overcome these and propose practical actions going forward

Variation of Legionella spp. with Lake Depth and Season in Two Norwegian Drinking Water Sources

In Norway, placement of the water treatment plant intake within the lake hypolimnion is considered a hygienic barrier against pathogens of fecal origin. It is unclear, however, whether this practice provides a barrier against opportunistic pathogens such as Legionella. In this study, water samples were collected at 10 m depth intervals near the drinking water intakes of two lakes. Legionella and one of their common hosts, Acanthamoeba spp., were quantified using culture-based assays (Legionella pneumophila only) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). L. pneumophila and Acanthamoeba spp. were never detected by qPCR; Legionella spp., however, were present in all samples at concentrations ranging from 2.33 to 4.14 log10[copies/L] in lake A and from 2.69 to 4.27 log10[copies/L] in lake B. For most sampling months in both lakes, there was no significant difference between total bacteria and Legionella spp. concentrations at the intake depth versus those on the lake surface. The results of this limited investigation of two Norwegian water supplies suggest that placement of water treatment plant intakes within the hypolimnion may not afford a sufficient hygienic barrier against Legionella

Data_Sheet_1_The benefits of flushing for mitigating Legionella spp. in non-chlorinated building plumbing systems.pdf

Flushing is a common corrective action recommended by Legionella management guidelines to remove stagnant water and replenish disinfectant. Due to water age and different local regulations, buildings may receive water with low or no residual disinfectant. In such situations, the evidence for flushing efficacy is often anecdotal, and the benefits are poorly quantified. Using a pilot-scale premise plumbing system, flushed shower outlets were evaluated against non-flushed outlets during simulated periods of both active and low water demand. Water and biofilm concentrations of total bacteria, Legionella spp., and Vermamoeba vermiformis were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR. Even after all outlets returned to active water demand, flushed shower outlets continued to have lower quantities of Legionella compared to non-flushed outlets for several days, but the decrease was of little practical benefit (10[copies/L]). During prolonged periods of low water demand, however, there was no apparent benefit to flushing. Total bacteria grew to stationary phase within 3 ± 1 days, while Legionella spp. took 12 ± 6 days, regardless of whether the pipes had recently been flushed or not. Flushing with hot or cold water had little to no effect on the concentrations of total bacteria and Legionella in pipe wall biofilms. Flushing with cold water (9.6 and 13.2°C) decreased total bacteria concentrations in the water by 0.96 and 1.00 log10[copies/L], respectively and by 1.27 and 1.74 log10[copies/L] with hot water (49 and 60°C, respectively) but the difference in Legionella spp. concentrations between flushing with cold (1.55 log10[copies/L] for both) and hot water (1.32 to 1.88 log10[copies/L], respectively) was negligible. This suggests that hot water flushing, even at 60°C, provides little or no added benefit for managing Legionella in non-chlorinated building plumbing systems versus cold water flushing. Finally, the immediate benefits of flushing in terms of reductions in total bacteria and Legionella in the water were comparable as well as the rates at which those populations recovered during post-flush or post-shower stagnation.</p