Selective Self-Stereotyping and Women’s Self-Esteem Maintenance

The process and implications of gender-based self-stereotyping are examined in this paper. Women displayed a tendency to selectively self-stereotype for personality and physical traits such that they endorsed positive stereotypic traits and denied negative traits as descriptive of the self and closest women friends. However, negative traits were endorsed as descriptive of women in general. Cognitive stereotypes were endorsed as more descriptive of all women than of the general university student. The tendency to selectively self-stereotype on physical traits was positively associated with appearance, social, and performance self-esteem. The results are discussed for their theoretical and practical implications

Perceptions of Blame in Intimate Partner Violence: The Role of the Perpetrator\u27s Ability to Arouse Fear of Injury in the Victim

Men are more likely to be blamed more for intimate partner violence (IPV) than are women who commit the same offense. However, because men are typically stronger and perceived as more physically aggressive than women are, perpetrator sex is confounded with masculinity and the ability to arouse fear in the victim. This study disentangled the construct of gender in understanding bystanders’ attributions of blame in IPV. Participants (N = 639) read a scenario in which the perpetrator’s sex (male/female) and gender identity (masculine/feminine), and the victim’s sex (male/female) were manipulated and rated how much they blamed the perpetrator and the perpetrator’s ability to arouse fear of injury in the victim. Results showed that male perpetrators (regardless of gender identity) who assaulted a female victim were attributed the most blame and were perceived as having the greatest ability to arouse victim fear. In contrast, feminine female perpetrators were attributed the least blame and perceived as arousing the least victim fear regardless of the victim’s gender. Furthermore, controlling for the perpetrator’s ability to arouse fear in the victim resulted in the elimination of the interaction effects for blame. This finding suggests that perpetrators’ ability to arouse fear is an underlying factor in bystanders’ attributions of blame

Divergent Roles of p75NTR and Trk Receptors in BDNF's Effects on Dendritic Spine Density and Morphology

Activation of TrkB receptors by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) followed by MAPK/ERK signaling increases dendritic spine density and the proportion of mature spines in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Considering the opposing actions of p75NTR and Trk receptors in several BDNF actions on CNS neurons, we tested whether these receptors also have divergent actions on dendritic spine density and morphology. A function-blocking anti-p75NTR antibody (REX) did not affect spine density by itself but it prevented BDNF's effect on spine density. Intriguingly, REX by itself increased the proportion of immature spines and prevented BDNF's effect on spine morphology. In contrast, the Trk receptor inhibitor k-252a increased spine density by itself, and prevented BDNF from further increasing spine density. However, most of the spines in k-252a-treated slices were of the immature type. These effects of k-252a on spine density and morphology required neuronal activity because they were prevented by TTX. These divergent BDNF actions on spine density and morphology are reminiscent of opposing functional signaling by p75NTR and Trk receptors and reveal an unexpected level of complexity in the consequences of BDNF signaling on dendritic morphology

Amplitude de mouvement du coude, développement d’une méthode de mesure radiographique et identification des facteurs influents

L’instrument le plus fréquemment utilisé pour la mesure de l’amplitude de mouvement du coude est le goniomètre universel. Or celui-ci ne fait pas l’unanimité : plusieurs auteurs remettent en question sa fiabilité et validité. Cette étude détaille donc, en trois étapes, une alternative beaucoup plus précise et exacte : une méthode radiographique de mesure. Une étude de modélisation a d’abord permis de repérer les sources d’erreur potentielles de cette méthode radiographique, à ce jour jamais utilisée pour le coude. La méthode a ensuite servi à évaluer la validité du goniomètre. À cette fin, 51 volontaires ont participé à une étude clinique où les deux méthodes ont été confrontées. Finalement, la mesure radiographique a permis de lever le voile sur l’influence que peuvent avoir différents facteurs démographiques sur l’amplitude de mouvement du coude. La méthode radiographique s’est montrée robuste et certaines sources d’erreurs facilement évitables ont été identifiées. En ce qui concerne l’étude clinique, l’erreur de mesure attribuable au goniomètre était de ±10,3° lors de la mesure du coude en extension et de ±7,0° en flexion. L’étude a également révélé une association entre l’amplitude de mouvement et différents facteurs, dont les plus importants sont l’âge, le sexe, l’IMC et la circonférence du bras et de l’avant-bras. En conclusion, l’erreur du goniomètre peut être tolérée en clinique, mais son utilisation est cependant déconseillée en recherche, où une erreur de mesure de l’ordre de 10° est inacceptable. La méthode radiographique, étant plus précise et exacte, représente alors une bien meilleure alternative.The most commonly used instrument for elbow range of motion measurement is the universal goniometer. However great controversy remains regarding its reliability and validity. Hence this study presents an accurate and precise alternative: a radiographic method of measurement. The limits of the radiographic method and potential sources of error were first evaluated through a biomechanical study. Fifty-one volunteers then participated in a clinical study in which this radiographic method was compared to the goniometer for elbow range of motion measurement. Finally, the great precision of radiographic measurements allowed us to study the potential influence of various demographic and anthropometric factors on elbow range of motion in the last part of this work. Regarding the clinical study, the goniometric and radiographic methods differ but they correlate. The goniometer’s measurement error was ±10.3° during extension measurement and ±7.0 ° for flexion. Secondly, the radiographic method provides consistent results despite malpositioning of the upper limb during radiographic image acquisition and easily preventable sources of error were identified. The study finally found an association between the range of motion and various factors, including age, sex, BMI, and the arm and forearm circumferences. In conclusion, error associated with the use of the goniometer could be tolerated in a clinical setting, the instrument being both inexpensive and simple to use. However, its use is discouraged in the research context, where a measurement error of 10° is unacceptable. The radiographic method, being more precise and accurate, represents a much better alternative