Effects of dishwashing detergents residues on redox status and cell proliferation in mice liver and kidney

Background: Commonly known for their cleaning and disinfecting properties, dishwashing detergents containing anionic surfactants can be potentially toxic due to misuse. This study aims to investigate the possible harmful effects of detergents residues persisting on utensils after dishwashing.Methods: Residues were collected after cleaning the utensils in 100 mL of water from 100 households in Beirut, Lebanon. After anionic surfactant determination, water with detergent residues (WDR) was added to drinking water of white mice versus tap water as control: G1 (TW for 2 months), G2 (WDR for 2 months), G3 (TW for 3 months) and G4 (WDR for 3 months), N=6 for each group. Animals were then sacrificed. Biopsies from liver and kidneys were taken for histological examination or preserved at -80°C for biochemical analysis of lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase activity, and expression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway proteins by western blotting.Results: Our results showed no significant difference in body weight or histological alteration in groups given WDR versus TW groups. An increase of LP (30%) and a decrease of SOD activity (25%) were noted in the liver tissue of G2 and G4 versus G1 and G3 respectively (p<0.05). In addition, p-AKT and p-mTOR proteins expression regulating cell proliferation were significantly increased in the liver of G4 versus G3 (p<0.05).Conclusions: We concluded that traces of detergents on utensils do not cause an acute pathology, but they could cause oxidative stress to the liver and an over-expression of cancer pathway over a relative long period of time

Feasibility and Safety of Uninterrupted Rivaroxaban for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Results From a Multicenter Prospective Registry

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.BackgroundOptimal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy is essential for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications during and after AF ablation. The safety and efficacy of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, observational, prospective study of a registry of patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 centers in North America. Patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural rivaroxaban were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients taking uninterrupted warfarin therapy who were undergoing AF ablation during the same period.ResultsA total of 642 patients were included in the study, with 321 in each group. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years, with 442 (69%) males and 328 (51%) patients with paroxysmal AF equally distributed between the 2 groups. Patients in the warfarin group had a slightly higher mean HAS- BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score (1.70 ± 1.0 vs. 1.47 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.032). Bleeding and embolic complications occurred in 47 (7.3%) and 2 (0.3%) patients (both had transient ischemic attacks) respectively. There were no differences in the number of major bleeding complications (5 [1.6%] vs. 7 [1.9%], respectively; p = 0.772), minor bleeding complications (16 [5.0%] vs. 19 [5.9%], respectively; p = 0.602), or embolic complications (1 [0.3%] vs. 1 [0.3%], respectively; p = 1.0) between the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups in the first 30 days.ConclusionsUninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy appears to be as safe and efficacious in preventing bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing AF ablation as uninterrupted warfarin therapy

Periprocedural anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing Micra leadless pacemaker implantation

Over the past decade, there has been significant improvement in the treatment cardiac diseases and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias with the development of leadless pacemaker systems. The Micra transcatheter pacemaker system has been shown to mitigate a lot of the complications associated with traditional pacing systems, which are notably skin pocket and lead-related complications. Numerous studies have shown the low complication rates associated with Micra procedure; however, there have been no specific guidelines or recommendations surrounding periprocedural anticoagulant therapy. This is important because a significant percentage of patients requiring pacemaker therapy have an indication for anticoagulation therapy as well. Multiple studies have shown the safety of uninterrupted anticoagulation during Micra implant, however, there is insufficient high-quality data to recommend periprocedural systemic use of anticoagulation. In this paper, we review the available data surrounding anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing Micra implantation and the potential bleeding risks associated with this procedure. Keywords: Leadless pacemaker; Micra; Periprocedural anticoagulation

Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker for the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is largely a benign condition focused on patient education, lifestyle modification, and avoidance of triggers. However, a subset of patients may benefit from permanent pacemaker placement. Commonly, patients with VVS are younger and those requiring pacing have symptoms associated with severe cardioinhibitory syncope. With the advent of leadless pacemaker systems, a lot of the risks associated with traditional transvenous pacemaker systems are mitigated. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of the data available for the treatment of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope using leadless pacemaker systems

Same-Day Discharge After Left Bundle Area Pacing

Background: Left bundle area pacing (LBAP) has emerged as an area that appears to be an attractive alternative to other forms of physiological pacing owing to its ease and favorable pacing parameters. Same-day discharge after conventional pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and more recently leadless pacemakers have become routine, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. With the advent of LBAP, the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge remain unclear. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational case series of consecutive, sequential patients undergoing LBAP at Baystate Medical Center, an academic teaching hospital. We included all patients who underwent LBAP and were discharged on the same day of procedure completion. Safety parameters included any procedure-related complications including pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, septal perforation, and lead dislodgement. Pacemaker parameters included pacing threshold, R-wave amplitude, and lead impedance pre-discharge the following day of implantation and up to 6 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 11 patients were included in our analysis, the average age was 70.3 ± 6.74 years. The most common indication for pacemaker insertion was AV block (73%). No complications were seen in any of the patients. The average time between the procedure and discharge was 5.6 hours. Pacemaker and lead parameters were stable after 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: In this case series, we find that same-day discharge after LBAP for any indication is a safe and feasible option. As this mode of pacing becomes increasingly more common, larger prospective studies evaluating the safety and feasibility of early discharge after LBAP will be needed

The Natural History of Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis on Screening Colonoscopy

Background. The natural history of colonic diverticulosis is unclear. Methods. Patients with incidental diverticulosis identified in a previous prospective cross-sectional screening colonoscopy study were evaluated retrospectively for clinic or hospital visit(s) for diverticular disease (DD= acute diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding) using review of electronic health records and patient phone interview. Results. 826 patients were included in the screening colonoscopy study. Three were excluded for prior DD. In all, 224 patients (27.2%; mean age 62.3 ± 8.2) had incidental diverticulosis distributed in the left colon (67.4%), right colon (5.8%), or both (22.8%). Up-to-date information was available on 194 patients. Of those, 144 (74.2%) could be reached for detailed interview and constituted the study population. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 1.7 years, DD developed in 6 out of 144 patients (4.2%) (4 acute cases of diverticulitis, 1 probable case of diverticular bleeding, and 1 acute case of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding). Two patients were hospitalized, and none required surgery. The time to event was 5.1 ± 1.6 years and the incidence rate was 5.9 per 1000 patient-years. On multivariate analysis, none of the variables collected at baseline colonoscopy including age, gender, obesity, exercise, fiber intake, alcohol use, constipation, or use of NSAIDs were associated with DD. Conclusion. The natural history of incidental diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy was highly favorable in this well-defined prospectively identified cohort. The common scenario of incidental diverticulosis at screening colonoscopy makes this information clinically relevant and valuable to physicians and patients alike

Abstract 150: Multicenter Validation of SPOT, an Artificial Intelligence Based Tool, to Optimize Selection of Elderly Stroke Patients for Mechanical Thrombectomy - Insights From the STAR Collaboration

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the current standard of care based on level 1 evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials. Recently, real-world indications for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has extended beyond the inclusion criteria used in the majority of trials including elderly patients. We have recently developed a machine-learning based tool, SPOT, to optimize selection of elderly patients for MT based on single-center data. Here, we use a large cohort of international multicenter patients who underwent MT for AIS to externally validate SPOT. Methods: Patients who underwent MT for AIS at 12 comprehensive stroke centers in the US and Europe between 01/2013 and 12/2018 were reviewed. Patients age 80 years or older were included for validation of SPOT. SPOT is designed based on a combination of decision trees and linear regression models to provide binary output of predicted good (mRS 0-2) or poor outcome (mRS 3-6) after MT. SPOT uses admission variables: age, gender, comorbidities, admission NIHSS, baseline mRS score, ASPECT score and whether IV-tPA was administered. Predicted outcome was compared to actual outcome recorded at 90-days after treatment. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of SPOT, and the negative predictive value was computed. The rate of post-procedural hemorrhage and mortality were compared between patients predicted by SPOT to have good versus poor outcome. Results: A total of 3,228 patients underwent MT for AIS during the study duration, of which 647 patients were at least 80 years of age or older and were included in the study. The average age was 85±5 years, and 65% were females. The median mRS score at 90 days was 4, and 21.3% had a good outcome (mRS 0-2). Of patients predicted by SPOT to have a poor outcome, 90% had a poor outcome. The area under the ROC curve was 0.7. The mortality rate in patients predicted by SPOT to have poor outcome had twice higher mortality than those predicted to have good outcome (55% vs 27%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Based on multicenter validation, SPOT presents a clinical decision in aid in assisting for exclusion of elderly patients unlikely to benefit from MT for AIS with a 90% negative predictive value